Jump to content

MAX- The Pitt


Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 11
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I am! And I agree, it's VERY realistic. Apparently, real doctors and nurses that watch sing its praises regarding said realism.

Noah Wyle was on Colbert the other night, and based on audience reaction, they like the show, too. But it is definitely not "fluffy" like Grey's Anatomy. Still, if one like a good medical drama with great characterization with a healthy dose of gore? This is the show for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members
Posted (edited)

This show is a very solid, classic episodic medical show - I think some critics realize this while others act like it is a major prestige revelation. It's not. In reality it is more a sort of neo-classical network TV for streaming - a kind of higher-end reversion to old form which I think we've just begun to see emerge (including, in a way, with Beyond the Gates) and will only see more of in TV/streaming going forward. Still, it's very well put together and I'm happy to see so many soap vets featured and doing great work. (Marci Miller is heartbreaking in Hour 8.)

That said: Anyone who claims this is very different from ER is fooling themselves and needing to draw a pretentious distinction that isn't actually there. I am glad the show exists but Michael Crichton's widow is absolutely right to sue them, lol. Not only did they change the name and change Dr. Carter to Dr. Robby when they couldn't get the ER revival off the ground, but all the small talk, banter, side stories with patients, etc. are extremely similar to ER. It's ER with the hour-by-hour premise of 24, looser content restrictions, and that's it. That's why it's what I called neo-classical TV. But I am enjoying it a lot! And I am glad it's apparently making a new generation discover ER on social media.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The ER ripoff is why I am hesitant to watch (I ran hot and cold with the show but it didn't deserve this type of treatment), but I appreciate seeing your review. And I'm not surprised some elitists are trying to do anything to just not say they enjoy the show. Reminds me of the critics who said Everybody Loves Raymond would be remembered as one of the best sitcoms of all time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm sure those are out there, but I see more people trying to dress it up and pretend it is not what it is, which is simply a very well-done classical medical drama (with the real-time 24-style treatment) which really should be paying ER's late creator some royalties. Some folks want to pretend it's some new revolution in medical TV, but while it may prove in time to be as influential as ER was on it and other shows it is almost all the same people behind the scenes and in Wyle's case in front of the camera. They're all doing good work, but it is not changing the paradigm. It's a reversion to the classical paradigm of TV for me.

Anyway, I did finish it and it is very worth a watch. Shawn Hatosy and Fiona Dourif are especially good (her father Brad Dourif cameos), as is the always-excellent Wyle and Katherine LaNasa as the charge nurse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

I get many are hyping this up - maybe even me - but to be fair, there are countless articles and videos from real doctors that do seem to make a distinction between The Pitt and ER.

Mainly that the former does more realistically depict the struggles of the day to day and the mental and physical toll the job takes on them, not to mention interactions with patients from all walks of life and different injuries and such.

Meanwhile, I have seen some mention ER as more of a glorified soap opera, at least in the later seasons. Me, I love both, so I won't quibble.

As for the lawsuit, I go back and forth. Yes, TPTB and Wyle wanted to do a reboot. But it seems Crichton's widow had issues or demands that were not agreed to. So they went and made a new show. I think it depends on how much of those ideas were put forth in the new series. Because on its face, medical dramas have been around since the dawn of TV. And plenty of actors and behind the scenes folks often work on more than one series together.

Since a judge seemed to think the case was not "meritless", I guess we will find out what that evidence is. If indeed the material was influenced by the meetings with Mrs. Crichton, she should be paid. But if it is just the concept, well...

I guess we'll see either way. I do think this will eventually be settled out of court, myself. Time will tell.

Edited by Wendy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Grey's and most medical shows since make ER (its first to middle years, at least) look like Hill Street Blues IMO. The Pitt is certainly closer to ER - in patient and staff banter, style, etc. - than any of them. And I think everything you mention above was also certainly all there in ER. Especially interaction with patients from all walks of life.

My understanding of Crichton's estate demands, at least per press reports, is that they were fairly cut and dried based on the original contract, and Zaslav's WB just didn't want to do it. I think it's tacky. That being said, could I have seen a place in this cast for many ER characters other than John Carter? No. So it really doesn't matter that much to me, other than I wish they'd done the basic due diligence if Crichton's estate was owed that. I think it was silly not to. And I absolutely think the show/Max/WB will settle too. The show is solid and it will go on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought this was incredible. I came in around week 10 and just blew through it. Noah Wyle, Katherine LaNasa, Fiona Dourif, and Taylor Dearden are doing superb work here, along with Shawn Hatosy coming off the bench to kill it in his appearances. I thought Isa Briones started off a little rocky but ended super strongly. Just great stuff all around. A lot of the guest stars were excellent too.

I don't remember enough about ER to judge the similarities. I do think this is clearly a step above stuff like Grey's Anatomy and Chicago Med though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

It was very weird seeing her in this kind of role after her bland Star Trek character(s), lol. I do think she did well though I often wanted to throttle Santos. I've liked Shawn Hatosy since The Faculty aeons ago so I am glad to see myself again vindicated.

Fiona Dourif is stunningly good, and so similar to her father. I think it's criminal she wasn't much known outside those Child's Play DTV sequels until recently, where she played very fun, demented material more in the family wheelhouse; seeing her in a more straight role here was jarring, but she was excellent. I wish she'd had the chance to work with David Lynch like Brad briefly did.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

I don't think there is a weak link in this cast. The one that surprised me at how good he was, even in his sort of manipulative scene when his addiction was discovered, is Patrick Ball as Dr. Langdon. I say this because, apparently, this is his first big TV role. He is apparently much more known as a theater actor, yet he knocked his scenes out of the park.

But, again, I can't think of one weak link. I liked Katherine LaNasa's charge nurse, Dana Evans, too. She is like the harried den mother of the bunch.

Like ER before it (maybe a bad example considering the lawsuit, LOL!), I also like the background nurses, techs, and such. They all add flavor to the mix.

Still, like so many online have said, I would love to see more of Dr. Jack Abbot (Shawn Hatosy) next season! He played the war veteran maverick doctor to the hilt and he is a great counterpart for Noah Wyle's Dr. "Robby". I have seen some wanting a night shift spinoff already with Hatosy's Jack Abbot as the focal point.

Edited by Wendy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I will say I'm glad that Season 2 is confirmed to be returning in January 2026 (and the time line for that season also already planned - the 4th of July).

I hate streaming shows that go years between new seasons. By the time some return, the details of the previous season are long forgotten.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Thank you, Jason. I always thought As the World Turns was the number one soap from 1958 to 1978. I guess that's not true. 
    • Does anyone have a casting choice in mind for Sharon ? I'd totally love to see Anna Maria Horsford 
    • That’s great news!! Thanks so much!!  
    • It would have been interesting to see Sam Groom back in the role of Russ, when the character returned in 1989 (or even in a later return).  David Bailey was acceptable as Russ, but he didn't have much acting range.  And if Russ and Rachel ever reunited, I don't think Bailey would have been the best choice, because Rachel's husband sort of becomes AW's leading man. I don't think Bailey would have risen to that challenge. But Groom could have done that wonderfully.  I would have also been okay with a complete recast -- hopefully with an actor with a good deal of soap opera experience and someone happy with the role long-term.   And to answer a question: I do not believe Russ's return in 1989 was originally meant to be short-term.  With the reveal that Josie was his daughter, and with Olivia on the canvas, there was lots for Russ to do.  I think Lemay's plan was that Russ return permanently, but Donna Swajeski probably didn't think he was exciting enough and lost interest in Russ.  
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • However, let me say this and I don't think it applies in the case of MM and BC. Straight actors shouldn't accept a role if they are unwilling to play intimate scenes that are often required in daytime. Imagine a gay actor accepting a straight role and saying they won't do any intimate scenes or have very limited intimacy with an opposite sex co-star. It wouldn't happen though, because the stigma works one way.  I think the limited intimacy has more to do with trepidation of how soap viewers will take it. The average soap viewer is older and more conservative and soaps aren't exactly drawing in younger eyes, so storylines have tended to lean more safe in the 21st Century especially in terms of sex and sexuality with a few exceptions.    On that note, I have finally caught up this week. I am loving the Anita stuff that is brewing and I'm glad TT is finally getting some meaty story to work on and not just be a mouthpiece to move others' stories along or play narrator. NuTed is not sitting well with me. I am having a hard time understanding the casting change, because the new actor isn't exactly hitting it out of the park and he makes the other characters play and feel different with how he plays opposite them. I'm going to give it time, but there was something more endearing about Ted #1  inspite of some of his acting shortcomings.  I am obsessed with Wig. Our girl is really crazy and I'm not sure they're going to be able to keep her on for long without turning her into a caricature or making the show a big joke, but for now mammaaaa (*Eva's voice*) is providing the dramatics.  I've said this before, but I'm super impressed by how far the actress playing Naomi has come. I wonder what she's been doing, because she's gotten so comfortable and the acting has vastly improved.  I have a feeling that Bill is going to say something about Martin being zesty and Chelsea is going to be there to overhear. I thought it was interesting that she didn't feel comfortable telling her father and the convo between Dani and Chels hinted that maybe he might be a little more old school in thinking. 
    • I disagree. I think Jill going off the rails made perfect sense.  It was a multi season process starting in season 8, climaxing at the season 9 cliffhanger, and continuing into season 10.   It was after Jill's story ended was when Knots Landing really went off the rails because it happened just as Abby was leaving the show.. and the Lathams didn't really have anything interesting to follow both of these events.
    • Thank you for that. I came into the show at a confusing time for Cliff because he just floats from one story to the next and his job appears to change. I like him even though I know I probably shouldn't since he's such a creep at times. I might have to go back and watch some of the previous stories because I'm missing some important pieces of Deborah and Geraldine's backstories.    Thank you for the explanation. I'm not sure I have the patience for that so I think I'll give it a miss. I must have bought it with the idea that it was going to cover her time on the soaps. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy