Jump to content

BTG: March 2025 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

To be honest, I think the main issue is that 90% of the scenes so far has been about propping up Ashley one way or another, but particularly with them continuously telling us what a great nice nurse-person she is rather than showing us. And it's not like it would be hard to show her being caring, compassionate etc. They've done a great job with showing us that Nicole is level-headed, caring and compassionate so I'm not sure why they feel the need to hit us over the head with Ashley.

Just give her more scenes with other characters where the scene isn't about the other characters telling us how great she is. I'll never get why writers sometimes insist on doing this sort of insane propping up since it never works and is always awkward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

I wonder if the scripts for this week were written at a point when the show's premier date was assumed to be the first week of January, 2025. Or was that just speculation on the board's part? I can't remember. I also feel like someone made a brief reference to "the holidays" in one of the week 1 or 2 scripts. If so, the third week would have started with the inaugration, which would have been a preemption so Thursday's episode would have been the Friday episode. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

MOOD - When you've just aced your psychological evaluation, but know deep down you're cray-cray.  

Please register in order to view this content

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ashley and Derek are like sipping tap water in good quality liquor (rest of the show). They are not needed at all. Sorry, but not sorry. I'm giving it more time...  But so far they've been incredibly one note. It's like watching another show that has nothing to do with BTG. Show I wouldn't watch. And please don't force feed me Andre and Ashley. And speaking of Andre - he needs some photography lessons... Because seeing the photos he takes - Yikes. Bad photography.

Please register in order to view this content

It's a mode I get into when I see my mother in law.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

They need to show us how she can book herself a ticket out of town and sashay away. 

Derek can stay. I have plans for him.

Please register in order to view this content

He won't have a lot of lines... But I have plans.

Edited by Maxim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

One of my recruits said immediately, that was it, she made a motion of washing her hands of them, she said I'm FFing Derek & Ashley, no discussion, that's it. 

I fell over laughing!!! 

Such a genuine authentic immediate reaction!!!

That's it. No discussion. Derek & Ashley, this is what they provoke.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • That was my point really. These anniversary party scenes are the first ones, and now they won't be able to use them (meaning these actual scenes, as aired, with OG Ted). They can recreate them but I doubt they will spring for all the extras to come back and film and recreate everything, so it will be more like tight closed in shots of Ted with one or two other actors, or snippets of Leslie's original speech where Ted wasn't visible. It would be hard to recapture the original energy of the scenes are as they were filmed in their full context. I just think that's too bad, but maybe they will prove me wrong. I never really saw what was so off in his portrayal to warrant a recast, anyway, so that colors my perception as well.
    • Yeah, and quite honestly, are there really that many scenes that are flashback-worthy at this point in the run?
    • I know at one point they were on Hulu & i-Tunes. I just checked it on JustWatch.com & it indicates 1 season on Prime Video & on AppleTV. Have fun!
    • That era is so weird...they made a big deal out of all three of those characters and then they just..disappeared! Not that I am complaining. We talk about the bad out of character writing for Alex under JFP..but this was one example that may have led them to write her being so obsessive with Nick.  WHY would Alex accept Flock of Seagulls guy as her brother? They had her in one scene (setting up the Alan return) complain that Alan abandoned her...she blackmailed him into leaving town and she had been angry at him for helping Brandon with Lujack and also using Spaulding for that dumb dreaming death thing. Endless scenes of her with Simon, I can't believe Bev wasn't bored to death! I would also add Pam writing the scene where she lets Ms. Sally die in front of her to protect Alan and  the writing for Alex could be screwy even before JFP.
    • On this day 34 years ago the final episode of Dallas and came in at an astonishing #2 in the ratings after two straight seasons of weak ratings. Interesting Knots was #27 for that week as well:  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Thank you for clearing that up. I wasn't watching GL regularly yet at that point, but seems to me I should have remembered the big wedding after Leslie's death (which I do remember) described in the profile. Is there a web archive of SOD summaries, or are referring to your own personal collection?
    • I was bummed that 2.0 ended because Mcpherson (headwriter) had really set up some interesting stories and we never got to find out where the stories would go once they resumed production on 'season 2'. I remembered the EP (Ginger Smith) and a lot of the stars gave a lot of credit to McPherson being able to come in on very short notice and come up with stories/plots (I think it was a very short turnaround time of a few weeks).  It was nice that she got to redeem herself after her year long Days stint was not well reviewed/liked.
    • Enters                                 Speaks

      Please register in order to view this content

           
    • It seems like a setup for failure to review a single episode of a soap, but Cleveland Amory was a foolish man.  His taste was so predictable, that one wondered why bother reviewing a medium he so clearly disliked. (found on Facebook retro TV group) Another case in point of his misogyny from his review of Dark Shadows (Can you imagine the magazine with the widest circulation in the country insulting its customer in this way today?)

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • They could easily be re-created, or even re-shot in different ways, especially if they were re-shooting scenes at some point, as well.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy