Jump to content

ALL: Couple vs SUPER Couple?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I knew I had another cite. 

Maloney, M., & Bell, L. P. (2012). The Young and Restless Life 0f William J. Bell. Sourcebooks, Inc. [beginning on pg. 70]


    Bill encouraged Bill and Susan's romance off camera, but he couldn't come up with enough obstacles to keep Doug and Julie apart on screen, not the least of which was having Doug marry Julie's mother, Addie! In fact, Susan Seaforth Hayes suspects that if Bill hadn't left the show after launching Y&R that Doug & Julie's October 1, 1976, marriage would never have taken place.
    "In retrospect, he was right not to marry us," Seaforth Hayes adds. "Only dull things happen to married people on soap operas."
    "Bill never would have married us," her husband concurs.
    The Hayeses are correct about Bill's feelings on wedded bliss and his characters. "I don't like marriages," Bill wrote in his story projection for DAYS in 1967. "That is, in serials," he hastened to clarify. "Too often, it closes doors rather than opens them."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Cliff and Nina weren't a couple or a supercouple.  They were just Agnes Nixon and Wisner Washam messing with our heads for a decade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I love that whole book that Lee Bell had Michael J. Maloney write. My very strong impression from it is that Bill Bell was very confident in his specific ideas about many things & he was not going to be having his mind changed about them. 

For one specific example, which I absolutely object to, Bell is said to have thought the sex between Bill Horton & Laura Spencer that night at the hospital when he went to her, drunk, was consensual. I remember watching Bill rape Laura. I only wish I had access to the episode, although I've said nothing would get me to re-watch it, but, maybe that statement would. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Bill may have stated he didn't like marriages but on DOOL,Y&R and B&B, he married off all the major couples.

Victor,Ashley, Nikki, Jack had several marriages under his tenure.

So I still don't get why Doug and Julie were a special exception. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I see what you're saying, completely. Just have no clue. Pulling an idea out of thin air, what if it was a philosophy he had with them them, early ya know, but abandoned because the pressure to have weddings was just too great? But, that is strictly speculation. Like 'if you can't beat 'em enjoy it'?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't get it either, but in a way, it made sense for Doug and for Julie.  As wonderful as the Hayeses were together - as I've said elsewhere, they're probably the only soap couple who, once they were wed, never should've been split up - I think they must've been PHENOMENAL when they weren't.  SSH's face and eyes were made for the close-up, so seeing the ache and the longing register every time she wanted to be next to Doug but couldn't...?  And all Bill Hayes needed to do in order to express Doug's need for Julie was to sing some song like "The Look of Love," and I'll bet viewers back then ate this [!@#$%^&*] up.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Couldn't also be that people grow and change creatively, and the way Mr. Bell felt about weddings in the 1976, was not the same way that he felt in 1986?

“A foolish adherence to consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds” Ralph Waldo Emerson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But, marriages on the Young and the Restless and the Bold and the Beautiful did not last long.

B&B brakes couples up too fast for anyone to care.

On Y&R for example Victor and Nikki have been a super couple for nearly 45 years but they've only actually been married for less than 20.  Victor started cheating on Nikki just one year into the marriage.

And for characters like Ashley, she got married so frequently most of her pairings I don't care about outside of Victor and maybe Brad.

I think ABC, specifically General Hospital is the best at super couples because they're given years to build momentum on screen.

Edited by Planet Soap
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

We saw in the 1980s and 1990s Ratings threads that Days had a ratings drop in the last year and a half of the supercouple era (Spring 1989 to Fall 1990). Lots of factors in play I think: viewers getting tired of the supercouple and action/adventure trends, head writer change from Leah Laiman to Anne Howard Bailey then Richard J. Allen and Anne Schoettle, lead-in change from Scrabble to Generations, time slot rival Y&R being #1 by a large margin, time slot rival B&B showing growth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Wow, @kalbirthat's a lot of reasons! You might even say multi-layered, also multi-faceted. Given how fans can grow weary of too much of one thing, even if it's a good thing, with all of the rest of that going on, it's no wonder DAYS fell down in the ratings. I will never stop wishing that everyone had taken their half hour shows & tucked them in, rather than make them be the lead-in. That goes for Generations & also The City & PC! Those guys never had a fighting chance. They were doomed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

Couple:  Two people that exist well on their own or together storywise.  And if broken up, can co exist without the whole will they or won't they....and can be paired up with other people in equally popular couplings.

Supercouples: To me, a kiss of death in terms of plot and character development.  They cease to exist as an individual character.  Only way to pair them with others successfully if one of the two leaves the canvas.

Examples of super couples:

 

1) Luke and Laura

2) Greg and Jenny

3) Tad and Dixie

4) Josh and Reva

5) Bo and Hope

 

Examples of couples:

 

1) Adam and Brooke (AMC)

2) Tom and Erica (AMC)

3) Ed and Holly (GL)

4) Lisa and Bob (ATWT)

5) Paul and Lauren (Y & R)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I feel like the show has been like this for the past 15 or more years, IMO. Things happen but there are never or RARELY any long-term impacts. Instead, everything (characters, history) is just reset to what it was before. In a couple of months, Hope will be working at Forrester again. No one will ever mention the takeover. Brooke and Ridge will be back together for the millionth time, etc etc.  It's hard to get invested in a story when you know this is how the show works.
    • Martin and Smitty's kids not being there seemed like a glaring omission. Also, Naomi and Jacob weren't there as well. I know some of this is probably budget, but it seems like there could be a way to still have them all there.
    • Thanks so much for finding this & posting it. This makes me so angry!!!
    • Dani had a flashback of Dani getting ready for an event with Bill. The gown she wore in the flashback was light green and elegant and gorgeous. The light green flashback dress was quite different than the red/orange/lilac swirling print beaded gown that Dani is wearing to Nicole's anniversary party.   But there was clearly the show's intention to have the Dupree women (except for Nicole) wearing shades of red.   I love Anita but the red gown that she's wearing to the anniversary party -- not flattering.
    • I think you can find them here https://www.tumblr.com/tagged/OLTL What's there is recaps from SOD at the times it shows which is usually from way back up till 2003. Most if not all of this is due to Matt Smith who you may recall from his AW playlists on YoutTube. 
    • Party wardrobe color theme: Good Queen Nicole is in a solid gold gown. The other Dupree women (plus Smitty) are wearing shades of red/pink (with purple accents) -- Anita, Dani, Chelsea, Kat, in dresses. -- Smitty in white shirt and maroon jacket. (did not see Naomi?) "The help" Eva and Mona are in black. Antagonist queen Leslie/Dana in a black/gold gown. The men (except for Smitty) are wearing black. Ted - white shirt, black tie, black jacket. (Ted's jacket was shiny with back polka dots on black background) Vernon - black turtleneck, white dress shirt over it, black jacket (no tie). Andre - black T-shirt, gold chain, black jacket. Martin - black shirt, black tie, black jacket. Dr. Carlton Fitzgerald - white shirt, black tie, black jacket. (did not see Jacob?) I didn't see Naomi and Jacob at the party, but perhaps they arrive later? The evening is not over yet.
    • Tate seems to love throwing punches now

      Please register in order to view this content

      I enjoyed his scenes with Johnny. Both of their perspectives make perfect sense to me and are completely relatable. There’s no right or wrong person in this situation and I like that. LH  does pretty well when Tate is angry too, but I also liked the way that he comforted Johnny in the end. Days is finally remembering that they’re cousins. And, Johnny looked hot in the beginning   Btw, Johnny going to work for Xander? That could be interesting. And, also can cause some more animosity between him and EJ.  And again, Marlena/Belle were great. Scenes like theirs really seem to be commonplace under Paula/Jeanne and I couldn’t be happier that they are. It’s helps us get a much better understanding of these characters and why they do the things that they do and feel the way that they feel. Marlena supporting Belle was a bit of surprise, considering her insane reaction when she walked in on EJ and Belle, but I also feel that it’s totally in character for her, both as a psychiatrist and as Belle’s mother.  As for Sophia and Amy… I miss the first Sophia lol but I can’t help but think that Amy suddenly being so nice is foreshadowing of something. Either that, or Paula/Jeanne aren’t biased against her
    • @alwaysAMC Great mini-review as always.  That Gilly story is...certainly one I could not forget... I imagine a number of viewers were shocked with the temporary recast. It was revealed in the soap magazines, as was the news about Frank Beaty's breakdown, I think. I think Wolf had some statements or an interview at the time but very little. I wish someone could interview him. He did a good job under extremely tough circumstances.  For some reason I have a vague memory of him in the Marian getup but that's probably not right.  I'm glad you have appreciated the material with Susan after a shaky start. I always enjoyed her, and she was the only love interest I liked Nick with. 
    • How did this come to be?

      Please register in order to view this content

      Btw, if he’s on again, you should apply to be a contestant
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy