Jump to content

B&B: December 2024 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 321
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

They are just making Brooke look good sorta of... and that she wanted to help pooor Ridge... before catching him kissing Taylor probably, when she'll embrace the revenge mode. It's just Bradley Bell doesn't know how to write and it comes off so incredibly fake and stupid.

But the turn is coming, know that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think what kind of annoys me the most, is that Ridge could have at least told Steffy and Taylor Brooke initially was the one who told him about Carter and Hope taking over, but again heaven forbid Brooke looks good in any light when it comes to them. 
 

sigh….i think I’m gonna be done with this show after the end of the year….

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Carter is a hot mess. He's too dumb to run Forrester.

I have no words for the Brooke and Ridge mess.

Zende who didn't recognize Luna was wasted is smarter than Carter.

Please register in order to view this content

Yes, this soap is a trippin mess!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And how sad for Taylee, it's not Ridge's love for her or her ill chakra that is going to make him go run to her again. It's because he has nowhere to go and feels "betrayed" by Brooke. The same old pathetic excuse and situation. It must be so hard being second best. Any woman with dignity and self-respect will refuse to have anything to do with a man in this situation. Will not believe him if he says he loves her. But we all know that Bradley Bell chooses the lowest of the low for Taylor, so I'm not gonna be surprised when she receives him with open arms. Her 5 minutes with him will begin.

Time is ticking and as soon as Brooke finds them together, kissing, making out, healing Taylee's chakra, whatever, then her empathetic plan to save poor old pig Ridge and bring him his company back will turn into poison and desire for revenge. IF Bradley Bell doesn't fu-ck that up too. It has potential, but I'm not getting overly excited in a show where nothing sticks and nothing matters in 6 months time. 

We'll see. I'm cautiously optimistic that this drivel can rise up to 5/10. 

 

Edited by Maxim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And the way Steffy was acting like Brooke as CEO is soooo wrong. Sweetheart, you were still in you father's testicles when Brooke was ruling Forrester with an iron stiletto. Sit your amateur, spoiled, entitled Marone ass down... and sh-t up. Your contribution, compared to Brooke's in the company is like comparing a little rock you found on the ground... and Jupiter. Sit down and go babysit your idiotic husband who has trouble connecting sentences.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So Ridge is in bed with Taylor a little more than 24 hours after storming out of Brooke's house. How predictable. And Taylor told him to Love her. Ew, you waited years for THIS, Taylor? Where did your dignity go... Or yes... I forgot... You haven't had pride and self-respect in decades. Can these two be even more pathetic. A man on the rebound and a second-best woman, begging for scraps. Yikes. As I predicted, Brooke is about to get a huge wakeup call when she finds them naked in the bedroom.  

Haha.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Why are these two seemingly intelligent women continuing to do this to themselves? It makes both of them look absolutely pathetic. And Ridge comes off like a disgusting pig.  I have to wonder if Brad Bell actually thinks this is good writing? If he does he's completely delusional and should seriously consider seeking some professional help. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What bothers me is that in 2024 Bold still doesn't have a leading gay character... when it's a show based in LA and... about fashion. Let me correct myself. DOESN'T HAVE A LEADING GAY CHARACTER. PERIOD. LA and Fashion are just adding to the absurdity of this fact.

Gay characters/people are all around the world. Not just in Fashion or LA. We are everywhere. And we deserve to be seen, heard, represented... and for the audience to watch people like us on their screens. Not to mention how many gay people are fans of this show and promoting it by just keeping the conversation about it online - alive. I really don't know... a straight person who watches Bold, actually. And the irony is that... we don't even have 1 character like us... on the show.

Back to the fashion aspect of it... it is ludicrous. In what reality is the fashion world in LA anything close to this chauvinist cis straight male-oriented rich boy club that it is on BOLD? I mean... just look at the greats... Look at Christian Dior... Look at John Galliano, look at Alexander McQueen, look at Yves Saint Laurent. Look at Mugler even... I can go on and on and on. ALL OF THEM WERE gay. No! In Bradley Bell's reality we have RIDGE AND ERIC. That's all. 

And in BOLD world... these chauvinist pigs are still acting like women are second-best to men... they judge them by another set of standards and morals. Just the other week... a cis straight man... calling Hope a worthless slut and nasty little bitch...  because she is not acting like he wants her to act and not bowing down to him. And...  THESE were words spoken by the show's leading male. Not the antagonist or some recurring character. (Not that that would not make me cringe too) No. This is what Bradley is making his lead male say. 

 ... 

I have nothing else do add. People can do their math and combine 2 and 2. What this is.  

Edited by Maxim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I'm screaming at those clips and gifs.  THIS IS PURE GOLD.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That's always been my thought. I can't imagine that the show would play up the unseen AD so far in advance without them casting a *star*. After today's episode, I wonder if he'll somehow be connected with Diane. It was strange that Diane mentioned her very distant family today. I can't recall Diane ever talking about her backstory. Maybe he's her much younger brother?  It's also possible he's connected to Diane during her time in LA. Sally's already said she crossed paths with him. OC, I think Dumas is Mariah's mistake.... As a side note, it was good to see some mixing it up - Adam with Clare/Kyle and Sharon with Tessa.
    • Here's the place to share some memorable criticism. You don't have to agree with it, of course (that's often where the fun starts). Like I mentioned to @DRW50, Sally Field was a favorite punching bag in the late '80s and early '90s.   Punchline (the 1988 movie where she and Tom Hanks are stand ups): "It's impossible to tell the difference between Miss Field's routines that are supposed to be awful, and the awful ones that are supposed to be funny." -- Vincent Canby, New York Times. "It's not merely that Field is miscast; she's miscast in a role that leaves no other resource available to her except her lovability. And (David) Seltzer's script forces her to peddle it shamelessly." -- Hal Hinson, Washington Post. "As a woman who can't tell a joke, Sally Field is certainly convincing. ... Field has become an unendurable performer ... She seems to be begging the audience not to punch her. Which, of course, is the worst kind of bullying from an actor. ... She's certainly nothing like the great housewife-comedian Roseanne Barr, who is a tough, uninhibited performer. Sally Field's pandering kind of 'heart' couldn't be further from the spirit of comedy." -- David Denby, New York   Steel Magnolias: The leading ladies: Dolly Parton: "She is one of the sunniest and most natural of actresses," Roger Ebert wrote. Imagining that she probably saw Truvy as an against-type role, Hinson concluded it's still well within her wheelhouse. "She's just wearing fewer rhinestones." Sally Field: "Field, as always, is a lead ball in the middle of the movie," according to Denby . M'Lynn giving her kidney to Shelby brought out David's bitchy side. "I can think of a lot more Sally Field organs that could be sacrificed." Shirley MacLaine: "(She) attacks her part with the ferociousness of a pit bull," Hinson wrote. "The performance is so manic that you think she must be taking off-camera slugs of Jolt." (I agree. If there was anyone playing to the cheap seats in this movie, it's Shirley.) Olympia Dukakis: "Excruciating, sitting on her southern accent as if each obvious sarcasm was dazzlingly witty," Denby wrote. Daryl Hannah: "Miss Hannah's performance is difficult to judge," according to Canby, which seems to suggest he took a genuine "if you can't say something nice ..." approach. Julia Roberts: "(She acts) with the kind of mega-intensity the camera cannot always absorb," Canby wrote. That comment is so fascinating in light of the nearly 40 years Julia has spent as a Movie Star. She is big. It's the audience who had to play catch up. And on that drag-ish note ... The movie itself: "You feel as if you have been airlifted onto some horrible planet of female impersonators," Hinson wrote. Canby: "Is one supposed to laugh at these women, or with them? It's difficult to tell." Every review I read acknowledged the less than naturalistic dialogue in ways both complimentary (Ebert loved the way the women talked) and cutting (Harling wrote too much exposition, repeating himself like a teenager telling a story, Denby wrote). Harling wrote with sincerity and passion, Canby acknowledged, but it's still a work of "bitchiness and greeting card truisms." The ending was less likely to inspire feeling good as it was feeling relieved, according to Denby. "(It's) as if a group of overbearing, self-absorbed, but impeccable mediocre people at last exit from the house."
    • I tend to have two minds about Tawny (Kathy Najimy) fainting during Soapdish's big reveal. You're the costume designer, if anything, you should have known the whole time. I guess it's an application of what TV Tropes calls the "Rule of Funny." Every time I watch Delirious, I always want the genuine romance in John and Mariel's reunion at the deli counter to last longer. Film critics had their knives out for Sally in this period. I'll start a separate thread on the movies page.
    • I don't think so, but I wouldn't be surprised if he was Dumas this whole time.
    • Tamara Tunie was serving up grand dame diva fierceness.
    • Nick told Victoria that he and Sharon had married in England.  Victoria was shocked.  Then she realized he was kidding.  He confirmed it was a joke and they're platonic. I don't even know what to say about that.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy