Jump to content

B&B: December 2024 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 321
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

They are just making Brooke look good sorta of... and that she wanted to help pooor Ridge... before catching him kissing Taylor probably, when she'll embrace the revenge mode. It's just Bradley Bell doesn't know how to write and it comes off so incredibly fake and stupid.

But the turn is coming, know that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think what kind of annoys me the most, is that Ridge could have at least told Steffy and Taylor Brooke initially was the one who told him about Carter and Hope taking over, but again heaven forbid Brooke looks good in any light when it comes to them. 
 

sigh….i think I’m gonna be done with this show after the end of the year….

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Loved seeing the chauvinist pig Ridge squirm. Go Brooke! Show them true Logan Glory.  

Please register in order to view this content

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Carter is a hot mess. He's too dumb to run Forrester.

I have no words for the Brooke and Ridge mess.

Zende who didn't recognize Luna was wasted is smarter than Carter.

Please register in order to view this content

Yes, this soap is a trippin mess!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And how sad for Taylee, it's not Ridge's love for her or her ill chakra that is going to make him go run to her again. It's because he has nowhere to go and feels "betrayed" by Brooke. The same old pathetic excuse and situation. It must be so hard being second best. Any woman with dignity and self-respect will refuse to have anything to do with a man in this situation. Will not believe him if he says he loves her. But we all know that Bradley Bell chooses the lowest of the low for Taylor, so I'm not gonna be surprised when she receives him with open arms. Her 5 minutes with him will begin.

Time is ticking and as soon as Brooke finds them together, kissing, making out, healing Taylee's chakra, whatever, then her empathetic plan to save poor old pig Ridge and bring him his company back will turn into poison and desire for revenge. IF Bradley Bell doesn't fu-ck that up too. It has potential, but I'm not getting overly excited in a show where nothing sticks and nothing matters in 6 months time. 

We'll see. I'm cautiously optimistic that this drivel can rise up to 5/10. 

 

Edited by Maxim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And the way Steffy was acting like Brooke as CEO is soooo wrong. Sweetheart, you were still in you father's testicles when Brooke was ruling Forrester with an iron stiletto. Sit your amateur, spoiled, entitled Marone ass down... and sh-t up. Your contribution, compared to Brooke's in the company is like comparing a little rock you found on the ground... and Jupiter. Sit down and go babysit your idiotic husband who has trouble connecting sentences.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So Ridge is in bed with Taylor a little more than 24 hours after storming out of Brooke's house. How predictable. And Taylor told him to Love her. Ew, you waited years for THIS, Taylor? Where did your dignity go... Or yes... I forgot... You haven't had pride and self-respect in decades. Can these two be even more pathetic. A man on the rebound and a second-best woman, begging for scraps. Yikes. As I predicted, Brooke is about to get a huge wakeup call when she finds them naked in the bedroom.  

Haha.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Why are these two seemingly intelligent women continuing to do this to themselves? It makes both of them look absolutely pathetic. And Ridge comes off like a disgusting pig.  I have to wonder if Brad Bell actually thinks this is good writing? If he does he's completely delusional and should seriously consider seeking some professional help. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What bothers me is that in 2024 Bold still doesn't have a leading gay character... when it's a show based in LA and... about fashion. Let me correct myself. DOESN'T HAVE A LEADING GAY CHARACTER. PERIOD. LA and Fashion are just adding to the absurdity of this fact.

Gay characters/people are all around the world. Not just in Fashion or LA. We are everywhere. And we deserve to be seen, heard, represented... and for the audience to watch people like us on their screens. Not to mention how many gay people are fans of this show and promoting it by just keeping the conversation about it online - alive. I really don't know... a straight person who watches Bold, actually. And the irony is that... we don't even have 1 character like us... on the show.

Back to the fashion aspect of it... it is ludicrous. In what reality is the fashion world in LA anything close to this chauvinist cis straight male-oriented rich boy club that it is on BOLD? I mean... just look at the greats... Look at Christian Dior... Look at John Galliano, look at Alexander McQueen, look at Yves Saint Laurent. Look at Mugler even... I can go on and on and on. ALL OF THEM WERE gay. No! In Bradley Bell's reality we have RIDGE AND ERIC. That's all. 

And in BOLD world... these chauvinist pigs are still acting like women are second-best to men... they judge them by another set of standards and morals. Just the other week... a cis straight man... calling Hope a worthless slut and nasty little bitch...  because she is not acting like he wants her to act and not bowing down to him. And...  THESE were words spoken by the show's leading male. Not the antagonist or some recurring character. (Not that that would not make me cringe too) No. This is what Bradley is making his lead male say. 

 ... 

I have nothing else do add. People can do their math and combine 2 and 2. What this is.  

Edited by Maxim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Lois and Gloria did the right thing I feel knowing it was Camila that raised Gio has BL feeling some jealousy No one is saying that Camila was a bad mother to Gio I believe it will be Gio saying that Camila was great to him, thanking Lois and Gloria to get BL to see truth
    • Its realistic for Dani and  true of how the character thinks and operates. We've known her long enough to by that this would be consistent with her past characterizatioin
    • Random takes: - What was even the point of that jeweler guy? Also—Dani was borderline harassing him. - I know I’m probably in the minority here, but I want Jacob and Kat to happen. I need something messy to completely dismantle the Duprees—and Katomas just isn’t cutting it.  - I officially can’t stand Jacob and his wife. Same goes for Anita and Vernon. - Hayley’s corset was just as ugly as it looked uncomfortable. - I genuinely don’t remember when or how Derek and Ashley reconciled—and I’m someone who didn’t even mind their storyline! LMAO. - Tuesday’s episode was a mess. - Dani finding out about Hayley’s pregnancy and immediately thinking, “She’s faking it”—huh?! What writer thought that was a realistic reaction? I get denial, but that leap was absurd. I agree the ‘Leslie Victorious’ moment was way OTT. But hey, at least I wasn’t yawning. The following episode, where she handed over her daughter’s last few belongings was much better. - I can’t with the constant back-and-forth between Orphey Gene’s and the Country Club. I forgot this was such a soap trope, but even back in my loyal viewer days (late ‘90s, early 2000s), it wasn’t this bad. While GH has a ton of beautiful sets, we’re stuck with the same three—and half of them are ugly. Also: it’s been way too long since we had a party, gala, or any kind of event. I know the Richardsons’ anniversary gala (back in late April) has had a big ripple effect, but I was kinda getting used to those large-scale episodes. Fingers crossed they don’t go with Guza.  
    • The horrific comments execs and writers make when they justify rape storylines or keeping rapists as love interests is just so icky. I remember Ron Carlivati's comments about the reraping of Marty storyline on OLTL. Made my skin crawl.  No matter what you think of her, Susan Lucci could have demanded front burner storylines but she never did. She was happy to be part of an ensemble. I never got that vibe from Zimmer.  For me, Reva was just not a character I cared that much about after a certain point no matter how talented Zimmer is/was. I think Zimmer had a keener eye for what made a good storyline, but she was less willing to take a backseat if it meant someone else got to shine. I'm trying to recall if she ever mentions Michelle Forbes in her book--one of the few times the viewers did not care about Reva in a storyline. My sense is if she did, it was probably some backhanded remark about how she had to show Forbes the ropes.    
    • GH was good? I havent watched since Joss went away to do her traininig and Lulu had just called Brooklyn out for having Dante's baby and not telling him
    • BTG: A-  DAYS: B+  Eastenders: C
    • There was a rumor that Jean will die and that’s probably why she’s back then
    • There has been some confusion about Michael & facial burns. Please see this post: https://bsky.app/profile/shallotpeel.bsky.social/post/3lqkrryu54226 I've chosen to put this here instead of the Classic Thread because it is now with the appearance of recast Michael that this has come up. Different places online, including at least one podcast, remarks have been made about how remarkable it is that he is without facial scarring. Other fans say it was clear from the first that he did not have facial burns. What is included in this post is 2 screengrabs where you can see his face at the hospital & a very quick edit of that day in the hospital. 
    • Put me in the LOVE KMH camp. As a poster alluded to above, her detractors seem to come from people who first experienced the 80s Emily actress. And that's often the case with soaps, myself included. I enjoy the original actor so much that I just never take to the recast. However, KMH played Emily far longer than the original - for almost 20 years - and when she had great material, she was great. I get the sense she didn't like playing the whiny oh-woe-is-me Emily which was all the material she got from about 1996 until she took over the Intruder in late '99/early '00 and got to play a stronger kiss-ass woman who didn't care what anyone thought of her. (Some would call that a bitch but, if a man was in that role, he'd just be called a smart and savvy businessman.) Her relationship with Hal was great. The transformation was done realistically and I thoroughly enjoyed those years the best out of all. Once the writers decided to break up those two, they went back to writing Emily half the time as whiny and pathetic. I preferred when the writers made her stronger.
    • Hahaha - I do. I've always been the type, though, that can't miss anything. I get FOMO, so I'll not skip episodes or fast forward anything. There are only a few TV shows I've dropped because they got so bad vs. sticking it out to the end.  The promise that GL 1997 is better is what keeps me going. I especially want to see the fallout of Blake's lie about her twins and then Annie's descent which I believe won Watros's Emmy.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy