Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

This was a travesty.  In his defense, I don't think this was ever Hogan Sheffer's plan . . . but Dena Higley (who was the writer to finally do Lumi in 2003!) eventually discarded him and his place on the show has never been properly respected since.  Until Austin Peck returned, Reilly (Round II) had him as a lead and so did Sheffer . . . and I'm not sure he should've ever been portrayed as that kind of romantic lead, but he and Sami should be endgame.  But speaking of, Sami should've never been portrayed as a romantic lead, either.

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members
Posted

I always felt he had romantic lead chemistry--at least with Ali, Nadia, and Ari. But again, Lucas was always second fiddle in all those pairings, so we never got to see him being the desired party. It was always Chloe, Nicole, or Sami yearning for another man. I wish that they would've brought on someone to pair Lucas with and allow him to have that one great love. Again, it just boggles my mind that any scion of Tom/Alice is not leading the show. At this stage, Lucas, Mike, Hope, and Jennifer should be the four pillars of the show with Sarah, Abigail (don't get me started on them stupidly killing her), JJ, Ciara, and Shawn D. driving story constantly. That's just me. The descendants of a legacy family should always be front and center. 

Posted (edited)

This! 

Please register in order to view this content

Personally, I am sorry about people quitting at the outset of Peapack. They had a big learning curve & they had to learn OJT all the way but they got so much better. And so many people came to see what they were doing because they were so excited by the possibilities of reinvention that were being broached. But, I also understand that comfort is an important part of the soap watching experience. 

Edited by Donna L. Bridges
combine 2 posts
  • Members
Posted

Easily the idiotic idea of Peapack! They should have just cancelled GL instead of making it suffer for another year and a half with Wheeler's inept production. It was embarrassing to the soap format to have characters just meet in a field and start talking. Worst idea EVER.

  • Members
Posted (edited)

B&B for a bit between 2020-2022.. i just watched it sporadically.. But I just can’t with this show full time anymore.. I know Fans LOVE their vets but how long can u drag on a love triangle? I mean Brooke-Ridge-Taylor has been done for over THREE decades. Man.. Just give it up Bell… And the Hope-Liam-Stefy triangle was dragged on for a decade.. The Hope-Thomas thing kinda irritates me tbh considering their past storyline of crazy Thomas.

I was about to give up on B&B during 2007 when Stephanie helped that dude to get close to Brooke and then he raped her. This show was lucky enough to keep me coz I loved Phoebe-Rick and Phoebes EX who wasn’t good enough for Ridge and wanted to kill himself. They struggled with the gun and Shane died. Stephanie helped Ridge to cover it up and frame Nick. That got me hooked but Brooke’s rape was too heavy 

I took a break from Days during the time Jack left during the early 90’s episodes and the Alamains and stuff dominated the show. Wasn’t feeling it. And Fake Bo. Nothing against the recast but Peter is the only Bo. And that damn Roman-John mess. 

Passions during my childhood when it became too stupid. That weird rape year and that wird mask stalker thing threw me off as a child. Was it 2004 or 2005? Don’t know but it was too much.

 

 

Edited by AMCOLTLLover
  • Members
Posted

Oh I think he has successfully proven himself to be a romantic lead . . . I guess I should have clarified that I don't agree that he ever should have or should be portrayed as a romantic hero.  Because that's simply not who the character is.  And Lucas is better for it--he's a much more interesting gray character.

I think that for a long time, Hope and Jennifer were not only two of the most important characters on the show, but they had one of the most important relationships on the show, too.  I hated the deification of Daniel Jonas by TomSell, but it firmly kept Jenn as a lead during that period and they wisely positioned her, Abby and JJ as the heart of the show.  When Dena returned, they really shifted the focus from them to Hope/Ciara, which wasn't as successful.  And even Ron C. really, really tried to make Sarah happen from late 2018-2020 . . . but the Hortons have been pretty unfocused, except a couple times when Abby was the show's leading young heroine and the family came together for her drama.  Anyway, I completely agree with you about how Hope and Jenn should be the pillars of the show, and Lucas and Mike should be included for sure.  Abby is the only long-term young female lead the show has enjoyed success with since probably Belle and killing her remains one of the worst decisions RC has made across his three soaps.  And I don't know why they got rid of Casey Moss' JJ--another really successful character.  And I definitely think Shawn should be the A story rn.

  • Members
Posted

I remember people in my country quitting Bold after the 2002 era ended (This was I think 2005 or 2006 in my country). It was the last period when the show was trending and people would talk about it on the benches on the streets.  People talked A LOT about Breacon and Sheila coming back... but then it all just ended. 2003 when I look back now is A COMPLETE fail compared to 2002. So it is sad that 2002 era USA was the last time the show was interesting to the mass public in my country.

  • Members
Posted

Bold and the beautiful:

When Ridge/Taylor/Brooke was basically the only focus starting in the late 90s/early 00s.  And also in the early 2000s, the show seemed to settle into a hamster wheel type of situation (big.events would happen..but no long term fall out.  It was as if the show became like the movie Groundhog Day).

  • Members
Posted

The first real time I just gave up a soap was Y&R, when they spent an entire episode recapping Nina's trial on a Monday, when they verdict had come in on Friday. I know I would at least watch now and then, but I never loved it again the way I had. I even tried going back after ATWT was cancelled, to see Maura. But they killed off her character, violently, in a way that seemed almost gleeful to be rid of her, and I have never turned it on again.

I can't even pinpoint when I gave up on GL. The last five years maybe? I still turned it on, but it was like watching someone die a slow painful death. The show became obsessed with Gus and Jonathan, and those "Inside the LIght" episodes quickly grew horrible. Peapak might have been underwhelming, but the soul had left the body long before that.

B&B---I stuck around much longer than I should have. Maybe the weird Brooke/Ridge tropical wedding, where Ridge was then presumed dead shortly after the ceremony so that Brooke could knock boots with Nick 10 seconds later? At some point I realized B&B was more invested in keeping them apart by any means necessary than writing for them as a couple.

  • Members
Posted

DAYS

I’ve stopped watching multiple times through the years but the two most recent times were:

Abby as Gabby while Stefan was banging her knowing she was mentally ill. I already suffered through this with RC as the writer on OLTL. I had no interest in doing it again.

Also Abby’s murder. It was so short sighted just because they couldn’t lock down either actress. The dumbest reason ever to kill off legacy character when there are recasts walking around town.

  • Members
Posted

There have been several times when I stopped watching a soap due to either a storyline or time period.

GL - Killing Maureen Bauer and keeping weak and selfish Lillian Raines until the very end of the show.   Then later on Nadine getting killed off in a cheap stunt.  My guess is since Reva was back on the show, Nadine was not needed.

OLTL- Having Bo be in a clear case of police brutality with RJ and the show explaining it away as Bo having a "midlife crisis".  Since Antonio was an old enemy of RJ, it kind of made sense when he ignored Bo's treatment, but when Hank even took Bo's side over his own brother, that really turned me off the show.

AMC - I remember turning off AMC for good in 1984 when Jenny was killed off.  Her and Greg had been through so much agony to get together only to have cut short because of a fatal attraction.

Eastenders - After watching Tiffany being disrespected by Grant for almost all of 1998, she finally realized he was never going to change.  She was trying to leave Walford with her daughter only for Grant to catch her and snatch the baby away from her.  She begged for him to give her the child, he knocks her down in the snow.  Then she gets hit by a car, bangs her head on the sidewalk and dies in the first seconds of 1999.  What turned me off the show was that Tiffany never got justice and Grant was still there for another ten months after that.  He left the show with his child.  I could not look at the show until long after he was gone.

 

  • Members
Posted

I have taken a break from GH many times. There have been some truly horrible storyline periods under various writers. DOD was one particularly bad era. The Shiloh stuff. My lord. I took another break during the summer of Carly/Jason's "romance". Yikes. I was so glad when he got buried under rubble that fall. And I hope he doesn't ever return to be honest.

For Days, I have also taken many breaks too and am considering taking another one now lol It's just not very good and I don't see it getting any better with Ron at the helm.

OLTL - The "Todd"/Marty rapemance. That was so awful. Ron and Frank at their worst. What the heck?

Guiding Light - I stopped watching permanently in I think 2007. It just wasn't one storyline that chased me away. It wasn't the same show anymore. Of course, the irony is now I'd give anything to have the show back.

Port Charles - I stopped watching once the supernatural completely took over and they killed off Eve. It wasn't my show anymore and I had loved it so much before.

Posted

I, too, have taken many breaks from both GH & DAYS. I stuck 100% with AW & GL & PC even to the bitterest of bitter ends. AW the killing of Frankie was so hard. PC the killing of Eve was so hard. GL I've noted more than enough ConWest "like to kill me"! 

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Some of those 1988-ish episodes are up. I'm not really sure she did much else. I think I recall something along the lines of she and Rusty had been suspended over the investigation of Nicky, George's supplier. I'm not sure she even gets some kind of goodbye. I think she just disappeared when Pam Long returned.
    • I did not care, just clarifying that was the discussion point. If there are ice cream bars in Statesville I am sure there is a full spa
    • Seeing Peter Bergman (Jack) and Melody Thomas Scott (Nikki) act opposite each other really makes me mad that their short-lived reunion in 2012 was just that... short-lived. I've always loved the Jack/Nikki pairing.
    • No.  I recall there was also a mention about how distracting it was EOB's Gwen wasn't wearing nail polish as well.  That it was someone's pet peeve. And, yes, the fact characters can have a manicure in prison is the wildest continuity issue here.
    • Can anyone remember Mary Ellen Stuart's run as Jenny? I'm trying to fill in the cracks for missing stuff that we overlooked.  Bulletpoints:  * Dated Ross * Rusty's police partner * Directly responsible for Dinah coming forward about George Stewart (Cam's father)
    • But that's not weird... nail polish is allowed in prisons via commissary. Same with general makeup, haircuts, and hair colouring products.
    • This is DAYS, the show that said you could brainwash anyone with simple kitchen appliances.  An actor's nail polish or lack thereof should be the least of our concerns, lol.
    • It was not that she wasn't wearing nail polish, it is that she managed to get a manicure in prison
    • "We're Knot Done Yet": the name of this lovely podcast AND what JVA tells her plastic surgeon at every appointment. In other news, Michele Lee is reminding me more and more of my old music teacher from elementary school, and I couldn't STAND that bitch.
    • I apologize if this has been covered already, but does anyone know whether Douglas Marland was HW'ing by that point?  If he was, then I see what he meant when he said (in so many words) that he had inherited a mess when he started at GH.  Aside from Alan and Monica, none of that material seems very promising.  The story with Mark Dante and the Corbins is the wrong kind of predictable (y'know, the kind where you know what's going to happen, but you just don't give a crap?), the stuff with Scotty and Laura is cute but toothless, I don't know WHAT the hell Gina and Steve Carlson's character are arguing about and Rick Webber has to be the dumbest man alive not to see David Hamilton twirling his invisible moustache over how to make a killing off Lamont Corbin's declining health.  (By the way, "LAMONT CORBIN"?  What is this, "The Shadow"?  And "Corbin Limited" sounds like some jive I'd hear over on Y&R.) In a way, it's kind of like watching today's GH, right down to the dialogue that's serviceable and pushes plot along but says nothing about the characters' inner lives.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy