Jump to content

General Hospital: July 2023 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 465
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Can replace is the issue here- just because they can do it doesn’t mean they are not still being scabs.  Or else their WGA contracts would stipulate they could seek a waiver or are covered under strikes differently.

It seems like so many people come at this from the perspective that if the soaps stop production then they end and that’s the worst outcome possible. And it would absolutely be awful for the folks working in that industry and ultimately the fans. But they are hiring scab writers to continue the scripts while actual soap writers are striking. They know their industry is dying. But they are still mostly out on strike and don’t go fi-core because as writers they see the bigger picture and recognize the importance of their union. And if anyone were to be replaced right away by AI scripts it would be soap writers.

People are not out here calling soap actors scabs- they know the score. But the writers certainly are that are still working on the shows. And these striking WGA/SAg-AFTRA can call them scabs anytime they want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes but Fi-Core writers are allowed to write during the strike for non struck work. Daytime soaps are non struck work.

Oh they can call them scabs but FI-Core is an option that the WGA gives

They give up voting, cant hold office

Still pays dues 

Can write during strikes for non struck work. Daytime soaps are non struck work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They are still considered scabs because the WGA is striking. They are not non-struck work for writers. Why would people like Michele Val Jean, who works as a writer in this industry, be on strike right now if writers from daytime were not on strike? Make it make sense.

The issue that seems to be confusing everybody is the actors- they cannot strike, if the production is not shut down they work or are in violation. That is not the same thing as the writers. Those writers are choosing to break the picket line, hence scabs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Also WGA only has one contract. SAG has many. One is the TV/Film/Streaming which is currently on strike

The netcode with covers daytime dramas, Variety, talk, news,  Game and Reality shows expires in July of 2024.

 

What should happen is the Netcode contract and the TV/Film/Streaming contracts be combind or at least have both these contracts start and end at the same time

Edited by John
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You seem really hung up on a term that has nothing to do with allowing anything. It is a status, and pertains to their demarcation within their union. Their status is fi-core, which means they do not support their union but do enjoy their negoatiated terms. The WGA is not the only Union that uses this term. They could be writing a sh!tty Transformers film right now, it doesn’t just mean soaps. It’s still work that violates the terms of a strike.  Again, if it didn’t, why are soap writers striking?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I just want to say that people call WGA writers with Fi-Core status scabs. A scab is one who crosses the picket line to work. When the WGA created Fi-Core status they were just legitimizing what had gone on forever, which is that someone wrote the show. I know that there were feuds between writers over the creation of Fi-Core status. People fell out with each other over it. Wish I knew more about that. Now I may not have said anything new. And I will leave you to it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Just to clarify, Financial Core as a union status was not created by the WGA. It stems from labor disputes involving non-entertainment unions. It began after court cases that were brought about to ensure that workers were not forced to join a union in order to be employed. It was decided that since they benefit from those union contracts and protections, they must pay fees related to bargaining but are not considered Union members. Contracts in the entertainment industry have the most leeway with this because so many people are willing to cross the picket line, and or work on non-union productions. Which weakens collective bargaining for the whole. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I know Passions used this trope with Ethan and Sam to drag out the paternity, but GH seems to speed through certain stories while dragging others.
    • For any other soap, I think I’d agree, but GH, I don’t know

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Agreed, that there was some strange choices in the episode, especially at the end, but overall, that was some great drama that opens up the potential for so much future storyline. Kat vs. Eva having the most potential, especially over Tomas. I have mixed feelings about Martin/BC though. I thought he did pretty well in scenes with Smitty/MM, but the scenes of him confronting Leslie and of him throwing the books were bad lol she acted circles around him.  It’s similar to what Harding Lemay said about George Reinholt at AW; he could be brilliant in one scene, but then mediocre in the next. 
    • I know some of y'all really like Brooke Kerr, and so I've tried to give her a shot, despite her frequent flat line readings and distracted "did I leave the front door unlocked?" facial expressions. But lord, she is so bad at playing a tough-talking badass that I was actually rooting for Brad today to spill the beans to Drew. 
    • Googling does tend to ruin it.  For those of us who were teens in the late 1970s and early 1980s, you can't imagine how much fun it was to watch the show in the afternoons.  (It came on right after school.)  There weren't any "spoilers" at the time.  We would always try to anticipate how each crime and each mystery would be resolved, and we were ALWAYS wrong, because the stories are filled with so many weird twists and turns.   The head writer (Henry Slesar) and his dialogue writer (Steve Lehrman) invariably toss genuine clues directly into your face in the most unlikely ways, but then they provide a host of "red herrings" to completely confuse you and send you off on the wrong path.  Once the story reaches its conclusion, all you can think is Why didn't I figure that out weeks ago?  lol
    • Does the vault have the original scene and not the short flashback?
    • I appreciate that you are using AI with the knowledge of it's limitations. Some posters take everything it produces as fact.
    • And of course Mama Ru herself appeared on All My Children.
    • The Saturday 8pm slot usually had the lowest rating of the NBC 4 sitcom lineup for some reason. NBC let Saturday night fizzle, They used 9.30 pm to launch 227 and Amen, both of which moved to earlier in the evening but they  kept Empty Nest following GG for several seasons.  Empty Nest should have moved to 8pm with their strongest new sitcom at 9.30, anticipating that GG would eventually falter. Instead they left them there and stretching the sitcom pool too thinly on other nights. When Grand talk over at 9.30 Thurs maybe Night Court and Wings could have been used on Saturday.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy