Anyone watching?

I've been watching, I think it's pretty fun.

I called it on Tommy Chong and Terry Bradshaw. I'm also guessing Donny Osmond and Gladys Knight.

Oh, and Margaret Cho.

1 hour ago, SFK said:

I've been watching, I think it's pretty fun.

I called it on Tommy Chong and Terry Bradshaw. I'm also guessing Donny Osmond and Gladys Knight.

Oh, and Margaret Cho.

I got Tommy Chong right and I thought that was Gladys Knight too. Which one is Donny?

Foregone conclusion given the big  ratings.

 

 

Last night it was Rikki Lake. She was the Raven. I didn't know her husband had committed suicide. I miss her talk show. 

On 1/30/2019 at 8:12 PM, Faulkner said:

Foregone conclusion given the big  ratings.

 

 

Glad it was picked up for another season. Their demos are doing very good. 

Just checked and they had the #1 demo for the night....2.2.....

Chris Daughtry has become such a fücking hot daddy.

 

 

https://deadline.com/2020/10/the-masked-dancer-craig-robinson-host-masked-singer-spin-off-fox-1234604904/

 

It is amusing, but how could anyone identify a masked dancer?  Dancers don't have signature moves that would translate to a masked competition.  Call me when they do the Masked Artist and I'll be there in front of my TV.

I knew lips was Wendy Williams.

lol 

 

Even funnier was when Nicole Scherzinger asks, “Is that Robert Duvall?!?!” And Ken says under his breath, “That’s… not Robert Duvall.”

 

All things aside, it’s spectacularly sh!tty they threw one of their hosts under the bus for sensationalism.

Plus, they gambled for a ratings boost and… lost.

 

Edited April 21, 20223 yr by Faulkner

Not to get TOO political in a thread that's not supposed to be about politics, but it strikes me as...well...interesting that the GOP routinely accuses Hollywood of corrupting the rest of the country with its' "loose," liberal values; when, in fact, I would argue that the film, television and media industries have done more to normalize and glamourize Republicans than anyone else.  And Rudy's appearance last night on TMS is merely the latest example of that.

And, of course, here we have someone who has aided and abetted our former leader in a multitude of sins - including the likely irreversible corrosion and perversion of our nation's supposed, core principles - being celebrated like a king on national TV, and who are the ones cheering him on the loudest?  The white, female judges.

Parker Molloy was right: we really have failed as a society.

18 minutes ago, Khan said:

GOP routinely accuses Hollywood of corrupting the rest of the country with its' "loose," liberal values; when, in fact, I would argue that the film, television and media industries have done more to normalize and glamourize Republicans than anyone else. 

It’s also incredibly hypocritical and disingenuous of them to rail against Hollywood when they are more than happy to turn up and play court jester on Hollywood’s platforms. 

Edited April 21, 20223 yr by Faulkner

3 minutes ago, Faulkner said:

It’s also incredibly hypocritical and disingenuous of them to rail around Hollywood when they are more than happy to turn up and play court jester on Hollywood’s platforms. 

Exactly.  Thank you.  ICAM.

GOP'ers want to tsk-tsk Hollywood, but they want Hollywood to give them and their deplorable-ness the mainstream legitimacy they so obviously crave, too.  (Never mind the fact that very few, if anyone, who lives outside of Hollywood or NYC looks to the entertainment industry as any sort of moral or ethical compass.)

Edited April 21, 20223 yr by Khan

I dunno know but, it feels like by paying Giuliani to appear last night, which will go straight to his defense fund, Fox is making an indirect political contribution to a crook who conspired against congress.

It may be in poor taste to employ Sarah Palin, but it borders on supporting illegal activity when they pay someone who is currently under federal indictment.

Just now, j swift said:

It may be in poor taste to employ Sarah Palin, but it borders on supporting illegal activity when they pay someone who is currently under federal indictment.

Yup.  FOX and TMS's producers either underestimated the negative impact that Rudy's appearance would have made or, more likely, they thought the controversy he was BOUND to engender would goose the ratings.

22 minutes ago, j swift said:

I dunno know but, it feels like by paying Giuliani to appear last night, which will go straight to his defense fund, Fox is making an indirect political contribution to a crook who conspired against congress.

It may be in poor taste to employ Sarah Palin, but it borders on supporting illegal activity when they pay someone who is currently under federal indictment.

AGREED!!!