Jump to content

May 26-30, 2014: Y&R Hits New Low in Women 18-49 Demo


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I have never believed it was Frons' purpose or mission to get rid of soaps. I think his vision was flawed, but he genuinely believed he was doing what needed to be done to transform soaps, transition them into a new age and save the genre. He was wrong. But he wasn't evil the way some people try to make him out to be. And Ron and Frank think they're returning GH to the golden age type of show that epitomizes soaps' glory years. They too are wrong. That's not what they're doing. They're just capitalizing on the worst that soaps ever were and completely ignoring the bond viewers build with characters over years of viewing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 38
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Ron and Frank didn't do much to help OLTL either. I think it was better than GH is now, but not by much. They had the same problems there that they do on GH. They're just not very good.

Ron and Frank didn't do much to help OLTL either. I think it was better than GH is now, but not by much. They had the same problems there that they do on GH. They're just not very good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

While I agree that their departures aren't the sole reasons for the ratings drop, I do think they are a factor. Part of the reason Y&R doesn't feel like Y&R anymore is because of the amount of actors no longer with the show in such a short period of time. Of course the writing plays a huge part as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think this sentence makes sense. They have higher ratings than they did a year ago, therefore their ratings are up. You could look at week to week comparisons to find a way to say ratings are down, but the weekly whims of the audience makes that a bad way to judge. Wasn't it a few weeks ago the subtitie to this thread was GH attracts largest sweeps audience in 7 years?

It's only the worst it has ever been if you do not think the era of Sonny, Carly and Jason on the show seven days a week was the worst it has ever been. If you miss the day of the drabs then it is the worst it has ever been.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Please! You may not have liked who was featured, but at least stories were told and we were not subjected to Connect The Plots! Nothing is worse than consistent OFFSCREEN storytelling! We won't even discuss the weekly retcons because that could take all day.

I loved the mob, but I agree that no 3 characters should dominate a soap opera. But again, nothing is worse than the severely polluted disjointed mess going on now!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You loved the mob but feel no three characters should dominate a soap. How can that be? The very definition of the mob on GH was three characters dominating the soap. So if you loved the mob you therefore loved Sonny, Carly and Jason dominating the soap every day. They no longer do so and consequently this is worse than what you loved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I hope this played better than it sounds, because I'm imagining two separate scenes (the attack by Arnie, and later Charles getting shot). In my mind, it should have been a fluid single sequence. I wonder if or how often "bastard" was uttered in this scene. Fare thee well, Christopher Reeve. I've said it before, but pop culture's gain was daytime's definite loss. Imagine seeing HIM day after day, year after year, decade after decade, conceivably until they stopped producing soaps in NYC.   Well, that answers my "bastard" question. Good lord, the roads of Rosehill are packed with high-strung drivers and/or pedestrians. More sequences that I hope played better than they sound.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think Ben had already left while under Marland and only returned briefly to reconcile with Eve. The whole thing confuses me as I thought for a long time that Eve left the show to go be with him and that was when they reconciled, but it seems like he returned, they got back together, then he left and maybe they were still together until she left to join him? I have no idea.  It does seem like the interim writers were using some characters like Justin and Helena who were quickly dumped under Kobe/Long, which is a shame. Helena is one of those characters who likely always had a shelf life but Rose Alaio was such a vibrant screen presence, if Kobe/Long had just been patient, she likely would have fit in well in the Reva era.
    • Also, the lawsuit story was not the right story to bring Naomi and Bill into a court battle since those types of lawsuits are usually resolved via settlements.
    • I know that Sara did eventually become Carrie's therapist, but I was curious if the show had her make comments regarding Carrie's stunts of making it seem as though Justin was cheating on Jackie.  Given that Justin cheated on Sara with both Jackie and Brandy, I wondered if it was wise of her to counsel Carrie given the conflict of interest involved. @DRW50I think once Adam/Sara end up married.. Marland didn't see any reason to explore Sara's personal life after the actor playing Adam was released.  I know that Sara lasts until at least Christmas 1982 on the show.. but I don't think she ended up staying on for very long into 1983. The period between Marland quitting and Pam Long starting was the perfect time to clean house on characters that had outgrown their usefulness  (i.e. Ben, Evie, Sara, Jennifer, Morgan).. and tying up stories started by Marland that were too complex (Mona Enright, Mark/Jennifer/Amanda triangle).
    • Unpopular opinion:  The focus on the soap opera tropes over the mysteries and crimes was partly what did the show in.  Also, featuring characters not involved in the legal, police, and criminal elements also hurt the show and took away what made it unique. Featuring characters like Jody, Raven, Sky, etc hurt the show long term.  The show ABCified starting in 1976/1977 and then went through a youthification period starting in 1981.  
    • I feel like the lawsuit storyline was resolved quickly because the show didn’t want to spring for more sets.
    • It's been a while, but we have seen the foyer to Bill and Hayley's house as well as the exterior entrance to their house. The foyer was first seen in the premiere episode when Hayley met Vanessa at the house.
    • There's still a year or two before Larkin arrives. Joel is there already. EON does noticeably youthify, although I think they carry it off. Admittedly I haven't seen most of the Jody stories, which from what people here have said aren't great.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy