Members alexisfan07 Posted August 18, 2013 Members Share Posted August 18, 2013 To me, that would be a scream of someone discovering their dad killed himself (or tried to). I'm not sure. I hope we get to see whatever she's seeing though and that's not the cliffhanger. Jen Pepperman said she doesn't like bringing people back from the dead, insisting Cole, Hope and Victor (the baby) are dead. So if it's Mitch, that would be so incredibly lame. But I think he's the only person that she would react like that to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members John Posted August 18, 2013 Members Share Posted August 18, 2013 Please register in order to view this content Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members CBRVA83 Posted August 18, 2013 Members Share Posted August 18, 2013 I think that it's Allison (maybe trying to kill Clint) that Natalie sees, and ITA with you about JP and PP going by their word about not bringing people back from the dead! And who is that women on the left in your avi pic with that guy from "The Killing"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members marceline Posted August 19, 2013 Members Share Posted August 19, 2013 To me that's the scream of someone seeing a lot of blood. I mean, strapped to Dexter Morgan's table, Grey's Anatomy hospital shooting, Eric Northman drinking Clint's blood level stuff. I just hope that whatever she sees is truly worth of that reaction. That's the type of thing that brings viewers back for another season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members alexisfan07 Posted August 19, 2013 Members Share Posted August 19, 2013 Yeah that's possible! It's Mireille Enos, who plays Linden Yeah I didn't think of the blood angle, that's a good suggestion too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members cassadine1991 Posted August 19, 2013 Author Members Share Posted August 19, 2013 it does go under blood-curdling scream/screaming "bloody" murder... could we get getting a slasher s/l or it's someone else?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members marceline Posted August 19, 2013 Members Share Posted August 19, 2013 I doubt about a slasher story. Soaps generally only use serial killers as a way to get rid of characters and reset the canvas. I see no reason for OLTL to do that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members cassadine1991 Posted August 19, 2013 Author Members Share Posted August 19, 2013 I figured as much it's something else, but I can think of two other soaps who need a serial killer or two Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Vee Posted August 19, 2013 Members Share Posted August 19, 2013 I can think of a good serial killer story to do - something like Bo investigating an old, old case from his past that reopens, a la the Zodiac Killer. But that's an arc you could play out fairly slowly for several seasons, in the background at first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members cassadine1991 Posted August 19, 2013 Author Members Share Posted August 19, 2013 I remember seeing some specials on Investigation Discovery.. And then reading about him, that'd be perfect if they did a storyline like that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members CBRVA83 Posted August 19, 2013 Members Share Posted August 19, 2013 Thanks alexisfan07! I didn't recognize her with all that makeup on and that blonde hair! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members alexisfan07 Posted August 19, 2013 Members Share Posted August 19, 2013 No problem! Mireille has had noticeably blonder hair this season, it's just hard to tell because it's always pulled back. Here's the photo. I just photoshopped the images together. http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2013/07/28/magazine/28talk/28talk-articleInline-v2.png Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.