Jump to content

Under the Dome: Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 38
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Episode 2 was awesome as well.

I really love that characters walk in and out of each other's scenes, giving all the separate stories a sense of co-existing in the same universe. TRUE BLOOD should take some notes. I really hope they keep this up, I am loving it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

10 p.m.

CBS:
"Under the Dome" (10.6 million, 6.5/11)
ABC: "Mistresses" (4 million, 2.8/5)
NBC: "Siberia" (2.7 million, 1.6/3)

18-49 leader: "Under the Dome" (2.7)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

10 p.m.

CBS:
"Under the Dome" (11.4 million, 7.0/12)
ABC: "Mistresses" (4.1 million, 2.9/5)
NBC: Special - "The Little Prince" (3.05 million, 2.0/3)

18-49 leader: "Under the Dome" (2.8)

The show was up from last week in demos and viewers and rating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Haven't watched yesterday's episode yet but I like this show! It's the only primetime show on CBS I watch. The premiere episode was very very strong and lured me in. I hope it continues to entertain. Now that they've renewed it, guess they'll be stuck in there for a long ass time :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

Caught up with last week's. The use of the song "Wait" was perfect. One of those moments were the scene and the music fuse to make a magic result (Caroline and Alice dancing). Also really liking Joe and Norrie together, discovering the second dome with the egg. Things are getting really, really good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I'm hoping that it doesn't happen. If the show keeps putting out good performance and story it will be hard to shut it out. Daphnee, Trisha, Ambyr and Colby are earning nominations without question.
    • Speaking of correcting dates, since you mentioned it above, why don't you go back to your Saturday post and edit it and replace your wording of "DAYS Ruth Buzzi 11-2-83"  with "DAYS Ruth Buzzi 11-1-83" and add a note that the video has the wrong date of 11/2/83 on it, and that the video is actually 11/1/83. 
    • If the show ever chooses to show any flashbacks of major Ted scenes, the Ted/Eva, Ted/Kat, and Ted/Nicole scenes would need to be re-filmed with nuTed. Since there have been hardly any Ted/Martin scenes with the CurrentTed, they have avoided the difficulty of doing recreated flashbacks with nuTed for scenes with Martin.  The only one would be Martin punching Ted after the anniversary reveal (unless there's something in the next few episodes). I agree with other posters that the fact that we barely saw CurrentTed and Martin interact, makes it less impactful to viewers to see Martin's outrage at the reveal. 
    • This makes me think of that famous quote from COOL HAND LUKE,  "What we've got here is failure to communicate." I did not bring up "apparently" to try to get across either truth or validity, but doubt. If I had been sure, I would have said something entirely different. But, I'm not trying to argue, I hear you & I will comply. Besides that, I will endeavor to word things differently. I am never against trying to improve. 
    • That’s been my main issue with his response. It didn’t feel that earned by what came before. Definitely needed to see more of the Richardsons as a full family unit prior to all of this.
    • Bingo! I thought the exact same thing. Martin's anger feels so out of place, because we've hardly seen him interact with his parents. Vernon and him have more of a father/son relationship and we've seen their dynamic more fully play out. While obviously Ted and Marton are father and son, it felt a bit empty because we haven't really seen them bond or truly connect in any scenes.
    • Leslie inferred over 20 years ago, so Eva and Kat are over 20 at least 
    • As it happens, 40 years ago this week, ABC and CBS revealed their 1985-86 fall schedules. NBC revealed theirs the week before. ABC's would end up changing. The original plan for Tuesdays was to have Diff'rent Strokes lead the night, with He's the Mayor at 8:30, followed by Who's the Boss at 9, Growing Pains at 9:30, and Moonlighting at 10. There was some surprise over MacGruder & Loud not getting renewed, but it was considered part of Aaron Spelling's declining influence at the network. Yes, Dynasty was still a hit (for a while longer), but Aaron's shows steadily took up less and less of the schedule. Fall 1984: Seven hours, five of which were new programming (Dynasty, Hotel, Glitter, Matt Houston, T.J. Hooker, The Love Boat, Finder of Lost Loves; MacGruder & Loud aired at midseason, by which time Glitter was gone.). Fall 1985: Five hours, two of which were new programming (Dynasty, Hotel, The Colbys, Hollywood Beat, The Love Boat). Fall 1986: Three-and-a-half hours, a half-hour of which was new programming (Dynasty, Hotel, The Colbys, Life With Lucy). Fall 1987: Two hours, none of which was new programming (Dynasty and Hotel; HeartBeat premiered at midseason). Fall-winter 1988: Two hours, none of which was new programming (Dynasty and HeartBeat). This led to Variety's infamous shady headline in spring 1989: "Aaron's Dynasty Over"
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy