Jump to content

Tony Geary, Jane Elliot, Kin Shriner TV Guide Interview


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 106
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Posted

That was twenty years ago (almost), and I thought you meant the press comments. I think we see how Geary views the writing of our saviors by the way he keeps having Luke drink in spite of scripts claiming Luke is on the wagon.

  • Members
Posted

He doesn't even have to speak to the press, but he does. And when he does, he makes a point of praising Valentini and Carlivati, as in the Variety article quoted in one of SON's news articles today. I'm not aware of this drinking thing since I only just started watching again a couple weeks ago. It might be he's dissatisfied with that particular thing. But to think he wouldn't be happy about the return of characters like Bobbie, Laura, and Anna doesn't make much sense to me.

  • Members
Posted

Thanks, I didn't know when Anna first came on. I knew Luke had been on at the same time as Robert and that Luke and Robert had been friends.

The general point still stands. Why would he not be happy with people with ties to the show returning that also have ties to his character?

  • Members
Posted

Considering his views on Laura, and his work since her return, I don't know if he's that happy at all with some of these stints.

  • Members
Posted

He could offer a kidney to Frank and Ron and you would still think he probably didn't like them, LOL. Also, not sure what you're referring to by "his work since her return." The old chemistry is still clearly there. He's been great in his concern for Lulu and his mixed reaction to Nikolas. That doesn't mean he would support Luke and Laura getting back together, nor would I.

  • Members
Posted

You don't have to be close personally to have a great professional working relationship and for it to be good for your character to have ties to other characters. Luke and Laura definitely still have some kind of draw to them.

Tony Geary is private and not close with many of his costars.

The fact is, Geary is going on record with effusive praise for the regime. The evidence on the other side seems to be largely speculative -- he isn't close to so and so, and his good performances are bad acting.

Anyway, he's not even close to the only one at GH who's said they're happy with Frank Valentini and Ron Carlivati. I couldn't care less what Geary thought if he hated them, since he also hated Culliton.

  • Members
Posted

Tony Geary in recent months went off-script to portray Luke as casually drinking - more than once - when scripts called for him to stay sober (Luke killed his grandson in a drunk driving accident). Carlivati went on Twitter to make sure people knew it was ad-libbed, not a writer choice, because people were so concerned about that image. To me, this isn't respecting or appreciating a writer, but we can agree to disagree.

  • Members
Posted

Ad libbing and rewriting scenes to suit what they think their characters should be doing are why I think Elizabeth Hubbard, Charles Keating, and Geary are overrated. This isn't something Geary only does with Carlivati, and isn't necessarily out of dissatisfaction with the writer or the writing as a whole.

I did read that Luke ran over his grandson. Maybe Geary doesn't think Luke would be able to be sober even after that.

  • Members
Posted

I don't know if there's a way to go back from that. Once I thought having Helena have Jake was the answer, as the character had such future potential, but that's a ways off, I think. I don't know. I do know he has to face it, as well as face up to what he lost when he disdained his history and his family - and be faced with a credible threat for Laura as well, which Scott is not.

Whatever happened to the house Luke and Laura loved so much, the one they fixed up and made their home when they came back in 1993? It was such a beautiful place.

  • Members
Posted

Umm the reason he stopped drinking was due to his drinking causing the accident... Not to sound snotty, but it seems silly to argue these points when you admit to not even knowint he very basic story (OK that does sound snotty, but I've not been a close GH watcher for a decade plus till the past year, but stories like these still got a lot of attention I guess--the Jake thing wasn't long ago.)

Didn't Geary use to often praise Guza to the press too--and now that he's left he's all about RC? I thought that was more the issue...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • Creatively, he probably should have stayed with The Doctors, where he stood out as an antihero lead. Not sure what happened with GH. He didn't have the same impact. Was it bad writing, not clicking with co-stars? Didn't they gave him a boat load of money to join GH in 1976? Was Mark Dante just a toned-down version of Nick Bellini? Were they basically the same character?
    • All I can think of is if a lot of big names were leaving around that time she wanted him back as a stopgap, although I have never seen any real evidence that he was popular with GH viewers.
    • I loved watching Shanice hand Leslie her ass and finally shutting her up. It was so good. I also love Martin & Smitty's family.  Anita has to have some sort of plan giving Leslie the tickets to mail for Winterfest. She has to be setting her up for a fall. It's pretty obvious to me Vernon is not cheating with Sharon. I think Sharon is helping him with his terrible singing voice for Winterfest. I still believe Bill & Dani are endgame but I love Dani & Andre too. I am definitely enjoying this story. And making Hayley a black widow is a nice twist.
    • Sorry for the spam. Wasn't sure where to put this, it's from Tony Geary's husband's IG. Tony watching Genie and Maurice on Mo's show.
    • This show is really trundling along BTW. When is someone going to show up to slit Beastmaster's throat or crack the whip on metrosexual Sidwell? (BTW, openly presenting this cheery bon vivant as casually bisexual would at least be something vaguely diverting.) At least kill Brennan by year's end. I'm bored.
    • She told Vanessa to "DOUBLE her offer" on the Jarvis house.  The Jarvis family accepted the doubled price.  Assuming the house has an appraised value of $2,000,000, she's theoretically paid the Jarvis family $4,000,000 for the house.  The bank would loan Leslie 80% of the appraised value ($1,600,000), and Leslie had to pay the balance with cash at closing --- $2,200,000.  She only had ONE million.  Where the hell did she get the rest?!  And now she's got contractors working on the house all day & half the night.  Who's paying THEM?  I keep thinking all this will crash around her.  Either that or the writers have absolutely no idea the limits of a million dollars.  Sounds like a "lot of money", but it obviously ain't when we look at Leslie's spending since she got that million dollar check in August.     
    • Maree Cheatham     pg. 403

      Please register in order to view this content

            MATLOCK Sister Peggy (1) 2025   Ray Wise    pg. 428 movie THE WOLF IN THE WELL    Roland Carmel    2024 THE NAPA BOYS    Officer Toland   2025   PodCast HAVOC TOWN      Josiah Abbess       2025    
    • Vernon is an idiot. Why would he have Sharon in the same hotel that Leslie is staying at?
    • Yes, that out of the blue return was odd. Maybe GG found a forgotten clause in the contract he signed when he was wooed to ABC and they were forced to take him back! Like George Reinholt he talked about the contract that promised him primetime roles. But it was loaded in the networks favor. I think it was Gloria Loring that re-signed at Days on the promise of primetime opportunities, but that was all it was- she was put up for guest spots and TV movies but not necessarily guaranteed that she get the role.
    • I still am baffled by why Monty brought back stunt hire Gerald Gordon in the early '80s out of nowhere for like a year. I haven't found anyone who can come up with a thing he did in that second stint of note.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy