Jump to content

Hannibal: Discussion Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I have never noticed that outrage before, but neither of them are, really. They are simply what they are. Any character on any popular show has its fanatical apologists, but fortunately the TV showrunners (unlike the people who made some of the later Anthony Hopkins sequels) know what Lecter is, and he is not an antihero or a vigilante. They have said he is simply evil.

I never knew much about Dancy before the show but he gives an incredible performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I think one of the producers went off on Twitter because some Mads fans kept accusing the show of ignoring his accomplishments and being biased against him/Hannibal.

They catered so heavily to "Hannigram" and all that, but a lot of those fans ended up becoming a constant headache in season 2.

I do pity them having to deal with crazies. But that's what happens when you pander so heavily to them and coo over their stupid flower crowns and "murder family" and all that crap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, the show is all about Hannibal (he's the title!) so I don't know what more some crazies would want. But you always have those people in a fandom.

They do have an active social media presence and they do enjoy their active fanbase, which I think is fine, and fun in moderation. Leveraging those fans got them their renewals on a network that is frankly a mess, and now with their international deal they are likely secure to continue elsewhere even if NBC was to cancel the show (I think they had offers from Amazon and FX). But engaging your audience offscreen is not the same thing as pandering onscreen or being led by fan opinion. The show itself doesn't cater to them and never has. The show is on its own weird trip and it's the closest thing to art that I've seen on network television since David Lynch, AFAIC.

And as for Hannibal and Will Graham - well, the show has always been explicitly about that relationship first and foremost, even before any fans latched onto it. It's not really a show built on a group dynamic, or crimebusters or anything like some CBS procedural. They are the two primary leads, everyone else is compelling but ultimately supporting. It's hunter and hunted, killer and prey, etc. That relationship, and the tangled web, the twisted sympathy mixed with the hatred, the homoeroticism, has been there since the original book as well as Michael Mann's Manhunter. It was specifically built on that before they had any audience. Like, say, The X-Files with Mulder and Scully, or to cite yet another Gillian Anderson example, The Fall with her and Jamie Dornan, the entire show is built on that principal connection and double act. Without that there is not a show. They're not going to suspend that or back away from the central dynamic of the show just because it has garnered an audience, some of whom are idiots, nor should they.

They have talked about weaving in Clarice Starling or a Clarice-esque character in later seasons while giving Will a back seat and then bringing him back in - much like the books - and that would work, because Clarice and Lecter had a similar relationship. I think they may end up using Anna Chlumsky's great character if they can't get the rights to Clarice from the studio. After Red Dragon Will ended his career a lonely, crippled, mutilated drunk, which is how he is referred to in SOTL. I expect that to happen to him now that they are bringing in Molly and her son as his future family (which he lost at the end of the book), but I think they intend to bring him back for one final round as Lecter in a future season. I hope they'll give him some sort of peace, but on this show peace has been pretty momentary so far (the arc with Laurence Fishburne's Jack Crawford and his dying wife, played by Gina Torres, is just heartbreaking - I know she died in the books but I keep hoping for the best).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But that's always been the show's nature. It's not fan pandering - it's been the show's narrative thrust, as well as their aesthetic, since the very beginning. Lecter and Will are friends, they are enemies, they are in-between. And while Will deeply cares for Alana Bloom, for example, his twisted understanding with Lecter is the deeper, darker heart of the show. It's always been that way.

Lecter recognized what he felt was a kindred spirit in Graham and tried to mold him into being a sort of homosocial partner in life - gaslighting him, manipulating his illness, trying to isolate him, tear him down psychologically and rearrange his life according to what Lecter thought would bring Graham's 'ultimate self' out (i.e., a psychopath, like Lecter). He's done that to other people, that's his M.O.; there are a string of them throughout his history, some of whom are shown in the story. Anything he can't turn into something like him he destroys. And so that, as well as the weird sexual component, and the undercurrents of the different strands of their relationship, from (mostly platonic) love to hate, and the mindfuck visual concepts, are really deeply embedded in the central DNA of the show. They always were, since the very beginning of the pilot with the blood spatter on the walls of the first crime scene. It's not something they brought out to tease people. It's the central concept.

Anyway, I don't want to bicker about it and I don't know how far you've gotten into the show so I will leave it at that. I hope if you haven't seen it that you will watch it sometime and judge for yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Carl I swear you pay way too much attention to the fans of everything you watch. Wouldn't you enjoy watching some of these shows more if you didn't pay attention to crazy fans?

I'm super pumped about season 3 though. Season 2's finale was one of the most intense finales I've ever seen and I'm very curious to see where everyone is at the start of 3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Members

Hannibal and Psychiatrist Gillian Anderson are just fabulous together. No wonder they get so many scenes. I love that, clearly, she knows... something but we can't tell what the extent of it is or what she's covering etc. I just don't want to see her dead.

Will remembering Hannibal feeding him the ear. I can't.

The poor guy having to literally tear his skin off to escape the human body circle the killer put him in. Only to jump off and get killed. I can't. I CAN'T.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Thanks!   Was anyone watching during this time? Wondering how Peggy’s rape played out onscreen. It just seems cruel to subject the Brooks family to this trauma a 2nd time.   Feels like the writers have already given up on the character of Jennifer, even though she sticks around another year-plus. She should be a passionate and fierce protective mother, but instead she seems just reactionary (and not even mentioned in this recap) This was also the case in ‘73 when Chris was raped. The writers are definitely more invested Stuart as the Brooks parent.
    • BTG got another SNL reference at 00:50  CONTEXT (so it isn't misconstrued) in this joke swap segment, Michael Che frequently makes his white cohost Colin Jost read racist jokes written by Che.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • It's obvious that Israel's presence is a major divisive issue, and this is something that the EBU needs to deal with. According to the now published results Israel got 13 out of a possible 19 max points in the semi-final, and while their song isn't bad there's no way they would get those numbers without some kind of manipulation/political voting. They are clearly using this contest as a way of improving their somewhat tarnished reputation. I know that some people are comparing this to the massive sympathy votes that Ukraine gets and which propelled them to victory in 2022, but I feel that that was a more genuine show of support than this concerted effort from Israel to influence the televoting. I even had an ad on Youtube from Israel in Swedish(!) asking for votes! It might not be against any rules, but it feels a bit icky nonetheless.
    • Yeah, as you wrote, an Israeli win would have been a political disaster. Congratulations to Austria. 0 points from the televoting to Switzerland was a disgrace. Other than that, I really enjoyed the show ... but I'm also glad that Eurovision season is over 

      Please register in order to view this content

      Full results: Recap of the Grand Final:

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Hahaha Sorry if I was too negative, I just started typing and typing once I got going hahaha
    • @dc11786 Thanks for taking time to answer my various questions, along with giving your thoughts on the different writing teams. I wonder why they didn't just have Ryder and TR leave together if Jane was going anyway. The discussions over the last few pages have made me more interested in watching these episodes than I have been over the years - without the extra details and analyses provided, these years can be difficult to decipher (not helped by how often Jo seems like a side character).
    • I didn't think this was very good (I've never yet seen a good episode of this revival), but you do get a lot of Michael Stroka. And if you are a Donna Reed Show fan, you also get Paul Petersen.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • A very rare, fascinating look at camera blocking in a 1980 episode. Very loose, almost startlingly so (who expects to see Will Vernon with a cig dangling out of his mouth?). @vetsoapfan There's some Jacquie Courtney content in the back half of the video.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Barbara Stock shares memories of her time on Dallas, including that Ken Kercheval was the only cast member she knew outside of the show and that she did not actually realize she was being written out. https://www.remindmagazine.com/article/29593/barbara-stock-spenser-for-hire-dallas-chips-spinoff-doing-know/
    • Thanks @Paul Raven  I concur that this isn't the most interesting material, but I do wish I could see how JoBeth Williams played those trial moments.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy