Jump to content

A video history of actors who were dubbed in musicals from 3'0s till now


EricMontreal22

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 15
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I an STUNNED that they would dub Debbie Reynolds and of all people, Harry Belafonte? What were they thinking? And I never realized that Kathe Green was dubbed in in Oliver. I have her 1970 album, and the tracks are really quite lovely. she onhly released 2 albums that I know of. she also had one on Motown in 1975, I think

Please register in order to view this content

One they didn't include that was one of my favorites, Lynn Carey for Dolly Read in "Beyond The Valley Of the Dolls"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xr5rzu7nbs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Debbie Reynolds being dubbed in Singing In The Rain is the most famous dubbing of all because it was a movie about dubbing. I am shocked at Drew Barrymore in Everyone Says I Love You because that was a movie built on starring actors who did not star in musicals. I really thought this practice stopped, but I see not. It's a shame because a lot of these movies you can see there was a Broadway star who created the role wondering "WTF??"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Drew surprised me for the same reason--I mean why didn't they dub Julia or someone as well then?

Yeah to be fair back then they always felt they had to have a movie star over lesser Broadway stars (ie Rita Moreno--who I love--instead of Chita Rivera in West Side Story)... and that hasn't changed except now it is largely a badge of pride to have the celebs do their own singing, no matter how awful they are (Pierce in Mamma Mia, etc). So I'm kinda of two minds of it. I'm not sure it rally shows a movie star to be brave the way many seem to think it does to do their own singing. But dubbing more often than not feels fake (sometimes it does feel legit, but...)--and it's too bad they just don't give the role to someone less famous who can pull it off. I mean Nine was a terrible movie version of a great Broadway show, but then they give its best song to Nicole Kidman who has a decent VERY SMALL RANGE voice, and so have to change the song so much, lowering it's keys, ropping high notes, etc, that it sounds dreadful. It's counterproductive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Maybe the most famous (or infamous) of those decisions was when Audrey Hepburn got the role of Eliza Dolittle in "My Fair Lady" over the Broadway star from the show, Julie Andrews. Of course Julie then went on to make "Mary Poppins" that same year, and won the Oscar for Best Actress, whereas Audrey wasn't even nominated even though "My Fair Lady" got nominated in almost every other category.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I always felt that musicals should pick an actor who can sing in the first place, so they didn't HAVE to be dubbed. That's one reason I think movies like Grease work so well. Sometimes it gets sticky when an actor is portraying a singing star. But other times, like in "Coal Miner's Daughter", it's a total win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That to me is the classic example of bonehead hollywood decisions. In hindsight, how do you choose someone over Julie Andrews? Maybe she wasn't Julie Andrews in all-caps back then but it just sounds crazy. And some of the songs from MFL are her signature songs too. Gypsy is another example. Ethel Merman had starred in movies before, and she was the biggest star on Broadway and a nationally known name, this was her big role, and they go for someone who does not sing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can see why they went with Audrey Hepburn. A part of the appeal is that the simple girl becomes a high society lady - Julie Andrews was very pretty and yet part of her appeal was that she had a certain ordinariness. Audrey Hepburn was seen as the height of elegance and sophistication at that time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah it was, but at the same time it made some weird sense at the time. Julie was VERY much seen as a theatre star with one minor hit (the UK parody musical The Boyfriend--years before the Twiggy monstrosity movie version), and My Fair Lady which did make her a huge name, but still people had no faith that she could bring that charisma to the screen. It is true that often they can't (Gwen Verdon was always passed up for movies because they felt she filmed ugly--even though she was such an attraction on stage that *straight* men would often make a musical she was in a hit as long as she was wearing something racy on the poster--thank God she was kept for Damn Yankees but you can tell she probably looked better in person, Chita Rivera, who doesn't have classic looks by any stretch, is another whose sheer stage presence made her sexy, but that's lost on screen, though she's great in the movie of Sweet Charity). Julie of course had jjust as much warmth on screen as on stage, but I can see George Cukor and all doubting if she could.

Right though in that case it kinda switched. Many critics said that Julie was MUCH better at the early parts, but did grant that in some ways Audrey was better with the latter parts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I LOVED that movie when I was a kid. It made it's TV debut on the ABC movie of the week around the fall of 1978... usually a motion picture took a year and a half or sometimes two to make it's TV debut in those days. She's lip synching to the original version of the song, of course... sung by Kasey Cisyk, which many people consider superior to Debby Boone's version, which became the megahit. Cisyk's version was released as a single, but only reached # 80 on the billboard charts. she wasn't credited as the singer of the song in the film, and she sued the producers because of it and WON.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Original voice

<iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/14200351?title=0&amp;byline=0&amp;portrait=0" width="400" height="300" frameborder="0" webkitAllowFullScreen mozallowfullscreen allowFullScreen></iframe><p><a href="http://vimeo.com/14200351">Show Boat - Ava Gardner 's own voice - Can't Help Lovin' That Man</a> from <a href="http://vimeo.com/user1114463">Mark</a> on <a href="http://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a>.</p>

dubbed voice

<iframe width="480" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/rGOyycNqiWA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Members

Now updated

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCNlpIlRL2k

I still can't believe some of the dubs--the whole point of Plummer's role in Sound of Music is he can't sing and is not a performer - and the song has a range of about four notes - I actually find his original version more touching

<iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/4143597?title=0&amp;byline=0&amp;portrait=0" width=400" height="225" frameborder="0" webkitAllowFullScreen mozallowfullscreen allowFullScreen></iframe><p><a href="http://vimeo.com/user1114463">Mark</a> on <a href="

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    •   LOL.  I realized this week's Lope montage also omitted the Paris remote Lope scenes with Kim Matula. I mean, they repeat stuff over and over and over. I have unintentionally memorized B&B scenes that I barely watched --- because it was repeated in dialogue and immediate flashbacks in following episodes over and over and over.  Yet somehow Brad thinks viewers (even casual views like myself) wouldn't notice the glaring omissions in the montage?  or as dragonflies said, the montage using Lope scenes that happened during the Steam marriage?
    • Well, you wont be happy at all because I think Marcus of all people shows up..you know they have to have a scene were Dahlia is swimming and Marcus joins her..despite the fact that he is a decade older then her. You could tell they were trying to make them the next big thing but then, just dropped it.  The whole wedding was also one of the reason McLaibey was so short term.
    • I would have bought it if Ed/Rick/Michelle were all there, but 1) Ed said he couldn't go because he had to work, to which even someone highlighted that he's chief of staff and could easily go if he wanted; 2) Michelle got on the plane with Rick to go, but J showed up and the Spaulding's kicked him off because why would they want another random teenager to go, so Michelle ran off the plane after him and Rick just let her go (haha, it was kind of dumb); and 3) Rick and A-M have barely said 2 words to each other in the 15 months I've been watching so far, so it was weird he's now just by himself with the Spauldings/Coopers.   But I know now why they're doing this, Rick is clearly there because Phillip has shown up. Very plot-driven, but at least I’m getting old flashbacks of Rick/Phillip during this.  Slight correction - Ed never showed up on the plane, just Rick and Michelle.  Ed had already made the decision he wasn't going. Once 'Slutchelle' (haha!) ran off, I thought it was so weird that Rick either didn't run off after her, or didn't call from the plane to tell Ed. It was only when Blake called Rick, who happened to be with Ed at the hospital, that he happened to tell Ed, in midair, "oh hey, you may want to go find Michelle, she ran off" hahaha. Yeah, I get that being a location shoot, they had to minimize the number of people, but to have Dahlia there over Bridget still irks me. I get it, at this point, Bridget wouldn't have any connections to any of the people there outside of Lucy, just still hurts. ETA: Ugh, and now Marcus shows up!
    • Maybe Brad can turn that day into an entire season. 
    • I didn't get to finish the episode last night. It's been a week and I was not able to keep my eyes open.  I will say that I understand everyone's comments on the new Ted. I think more so than anything is the shock. Where else in modern TV do you get an actor to replace another from one day to the next without a break or some storyline to explain it. However, it's such a soap staple that I can't help but love it when I heard "The role of...is now being played by..."  I think the actor is good. I felt like Kat felt different playing against him. I wonder if it was nerves or just maybe this actor bringing something difgerent out of Colby. I do think Maurice's acting range showed itself to be weak when he got these more emotionally charged scenes to play. I actually clocked him as one of the weaker actors from Day 1, but he definitely wasn't the worst and I didn't think he needed to be replaced. However, I'm open to new Ted. Maybe Maurice can come back as Andre's daddy back from the "dead."  Ashley is really becoming unlikable with her attitude towards living with Derek. Although, she should have shut him down the minute he imposed the idea on her. Also, if I'm living with someone and I have a guest coming over soon which I forgot to mention to that person than they are more than welcome to stay. Especially, if that person is someone we both know. They'll just be made aware that next time I'm going to need them to leave for a few while when I have time with a friend. It was so rude the way she approached it, which makes it even more confusing as to why all the characters around her put her on a pedestal and Andre is obsessed.  I honestly don't see any chemistry between Andre and Ashley. Andre gets on my nerves. I'm sorry yall, but I can't with that man. He always gotta let out a huff in that last syllable when he's saying something emotional. It's like okay now Big Bad Wolf. Also, what is the appeal of Ashley? She's boring. The character is bland. I do feel for the Ashley and Derek actors because what are they even doing there...taking up space.     
    • Liam hasn't had a purpose in years, none of the Spencer's have. The Spencer family should be written off and let Finn adopt Kelly, he's more her dad anyways.  IMO I think SC seen the writing on the wall with Liam. Brad is never going to let the character grow or evolve. Even dying he's being wishy washy and a waffler lol. Scott out there asking for Liam to be a villain and paired with Ivy only for Liam to continue to waffle I'd rather see Scott back at GH as Dillon or Michael Quartermaine   But I dunno I read Scott has issues with Frank that stem from his time on One Life to Live Also all the Lope flashbacks where when Liam was married to Steffy and one of them was when Hope was telling Liam she was pregnant(he was married to Steffy then) lol I need Steffy out of that white blazer, please burn it, it's awful. This day has gone on for like 3 weeks now. ONE DAY
    • Thanks! I never venture back to re-watch that period of the show 
    • I was wondering about Liam wearing that hat for such a long time, as it was supposed to be covering up his surgery wound -- but he wouldn't need a hat for this long a period of time. Then I noticed everyone's wardrobe is the same, too, and realized that it's been the same "Forrester/Logan day" for two weeks of episodes. I guess he just got out of the hospital and all these episodes are discussing what happened?
    • I would have to say FD was the luckiest man in daytime who stayed way past any reason for him to be there, but yes, totally agree that Alan should have died at that point, which would have spared us more years on mustache twirling bombasity.   I know it was a big get to bring Joan Collins on, and I loved her Alex, but it would have been great at that point if they had just brought Amanda back. Phillip is named by Alan and Alex as the successor or head of family and head of the corporation, with the board and investors approval. Amanda (who is back to being Alan's daughter, it was one last "screw you" from Brandon to try to get Alan and Alex at each others throats) gets pissed and comes back to stake her claim and be a thorn in everyone's side. Meanwhile Liv is suddenly REALLY interested in Phillip as he will have a longer self life then Alan. Things unfold much as they did with Amanda coming back to thwart Liv as Alex did..and when the truth comes out Alan really does have a heart attack and kicks (for real, for good, no fake outs, no returns, he's dead..dead.) and then AM comes back (as Taggert originally planned before Weston came to stink up the place.) to make his claim also. Phillip' guilt over Alan's death and having no final reconciliation ( On his death bed Alan could say, "I am proud of you son, you have finally become a real Spaulding," right before he kicks. ) I also agree that Phillip was not always likable, which really I give GA credit for being brave enough to make him that way, which is exactly how Phillip should be.   Ed and Chelle were there, but she ran off the plane to chase J...(I kid you not, that is why we started calling her Slutchelle) and Ed ran after her. The reason they, and no one else was at the wedding was obviously to save money, so it would have made more sense to have it on an existing set then that dumb Universal Studios thing.
    • They probably threw in Rick because he's AM's cousin, Michelle should've been there too. I don't remember if Ed was still on the show at this point 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy