Jump to content

OLTL: Character not returning for ABC finale


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Didn't Max and Luna have twins and one was deaf which Max had a huge issue with or something (art imitating life with he and KDP's son), and then he didn't even raise them once Luna died? I watched sporadically during that period, I remember very little of Gabrielle's return beyond the haircut and the degrading almost Rauch-like cigar stomp death, which I know, is an ironic thing to say.

BTW, JDP is one of the handful of soap stars I've seen while minding my business walking in Manhattan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 24
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Max raised them for a few years (the deaf story happened after Luna died). In late 1997, after they were accidentally kidnapped by RJ (his underling didn't realize they were in the car, or something like that, and they were then presumed dead), Max sent them to live with Luna's family.

Most of what I remember of Gabrielle is her being downtrodden and sad and just kind of out of place. She did have nice chemistry with Bo, but generally she had lost her spark. But then OLTL at that time could only do a very specific type of camp, and she didn't fit into it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ah, thank you for the clarification. I suppose Gabrielle, like Tina, and sometimes I even think Blair, is a tough character to keep the magic going with, let alone trying to recapture that magic after an extended absence. You really have to bring who they were at their height back to the table, even if the "style" is different from the show in its current form. Tina, Gabrielle, at their best, they are timeless. And Tina is SO above David Vickeroshi crap parody, and bless Andrea's heart for her magnificent ability to sell [!@#$%^&*]. But I'm digressing... But real quick, when you watch the eighties stuff, its all so over the top, but it was written and played dead seriously, they weren't poking fun at themselves, laughing at their own jokes, they were just pushing the limits and writing into the stratosphere and the actors, weak and strong, just played the hell out of it like a classically trained actor plays the hell out of seeing the ghost of Hamlet's father or Jupiter descending in Cymbeline. Now, they take a Tina and they try to invoke her eighties greatness by tossing her ditzy lines, but there is so much more to who she is and was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Lau has basically said that the 80s (or even longer maybe, I don't know) were not an easy time for him. I always thought there must be some reason he looked about 500 times better on OLTL than he did on AW, even though a decade had passed. Between that and whatever was going on with Charles Grant at that time I'm not sure what the set was like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I just meant that, like Lau, his appearance changed so much between his early soap years, his AW run, and his last soap run, on B&B. He looked fine on AW but always seemed kind of bloated. When he got to B&B he was just about perfect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Eh, no. Not interested in Max-lite.

James DePaiva is the ONLY Max. Period. If we can't have him back, don't bring Max back at all.

I disagree about Grant. I thought he was SMOKIN on AW and actually looked bloated on B&B. Different strokes.

Anyhow, this is what I can't stand about the current OLTL and the peoiple in charge over there- they pick & choose which characters from the past they want to bring back and use. And they do it like fanboys- it's never based on where the story is most fruitful or who would click with the current cast best. This is (partly) why we never see Renee or Max or Cassie or others I and some other fans would love to see.

Renee is one I especially miss and a reason why I appreciated JFP's tenure so much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I know some of y'all really like Brooke Kerr, and so I've tried to give her a shot, despite her frequent flat line readings and distracted "did I leave the front door unlocked?" facial expressions. But lord, she is so bad at playing a tough-talking badass that I was actually rooting for Brad today to spill the beans to Drew. 
    • Googling does tend to ruin it.  For those of us who were teens in the late 1970s and early 1980s, you can't imagine how much fun it was to watch the show in the afternoons.  (It came on right after school.)  There weren't any "spoilers" at the time.  We would always try to anticipate how each crime and each mystery would be resolved, and we were ALWAYS wrong, because the stories are filled with so many weird twists and turns.   The head writer (Henry Slesar) and his dialogue writer (Steve Lehrman) invariably toss genuine clues directly into your face in the most unlikely ways, but then they provide a host of "red herrings" to completely confuse you and send you off on the wrong path.  Once the story reaches its conclusion, all you can think is Why didn't I figure that out weeks ago?  lol
    • Does the vault have the original scene and not the short flashback?
    • I appreciate that you are using AI with the knowledge of it's limitations. Some posters take everything it produces as fact.
    • And of course Mama Ru herself appeared on All My Children.
    • The Saturday 8pm slot usually had the lowest rating of the NBC 4 sitcom lineup for some reason. NBC let Saturday night fizzle, They used 9.30 pm to launch 227 and Amen, both of which moved to earlier in the evening but they  kept Empty Nest following GG for several seasons.  Empty Nest should have moved to 8pm with their strongest new sitcom at 9.30, anticipating that GG would eventually falter. Instead they left them there and stretching the sitcom pool too thinly on other nights. When Grand talk over at 9.30 Thurs maybe Night Court and Wings could have been used on Saturday.
    • @Maxim Great to see your mini-reviews again. There are a number of clips on Youtube of Janice's slow mental breakdown, especially as we go into January 1980. Christine Jones is just superb. She played the hell out of that role. Something which isn't referenced as much later on is how Mitch pushed Janice's doubts and mental instability for his own ends...until suddenly he didn't want to anymore (I guess he caught on with the audience and the show became wary). I don't want to post a bunch of clips, but this one has a very good confrontation between Rachel and Janice.

      Please register in order to view this content

      This has a good scene around 7 minutes in where you can see Janice struggling internally with her need to identify herself so much by the men around her, all of which helps lead to her crackup.  
    • It really made Oscar the Doorman seem like an imbecile.   I think the show's unusual format & subject manner is what makes EON often seem less "dated" and "old-fashioned" than other shows from that time period.  It never attempted to be especially "trendy" or "modern" -- and its film noir style is pretty timeless.  
    • Dallas, Dynasty, Knots and Falcon Crest all had good runs but by 85 they had seen better days. I think they were a victim of the format. After several seasons seeing the same characters front and center viewers were bored. What was once fascinating grew predictable. JR, Alexis etc had to be front and center and after a while their schemes and shtick grew repetitive. JR remarrying Sue Ellen, Alexis constantly trying to get he better of Blake etc Unlike daytime, there wasn't the flexibility to bring in other stories and characters and maybe let the likes JR go backburner. That same mentality also invaded daytime with characters like  Sonny and Victor still peddling the same stuff after decades. I guess the same could be said for MSW eg every week Jessica encounters a crime and solves it,but I think viewers come to that format with a different mindset.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy