Jump to content

GH: Classic Thread


Max

Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted (edited)

Isn't it so that Mo & Burton would go into Jill's ofc, pitch fits, GET THEIR WAY, and life goes on? I forgot Geary. Him, too, with the fit throwing that worked on Jill.

What is said now is that Frank doesn't give in especially not to fits & so Mo is outta luck & Burton, because of his time at DAYS no longer pulls any of that sh*t. Which when you think about it, is quite remarkable. They say ("they") that he had to work so hard, learn so many lines that it changed him. If that is so, then GH owes DAYS a big thank you.

 

Edited by Contessa Donatella
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 7.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Yes.  There are even actions and words that KMc and Vanessa have talked about Steve and Mo saying to them and Vanessa sort of laughs it off even though I am like...

Please register in order to view this content

.  Hopefully everyone has matured since then.  I just think if you are comfortable taking shots at Tamara and Sarah I can't even imagine how much they mocked the actual unsuccessful love interests. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Your first point about JFP just about sums it all up! When she has strong writing pushing against those instincts (Curlee/Demorest being a great example), she can make an excellent soap. When she has a writer that leans into that favoritism and especially misogyny (Guza), it’s well written but bleak AF and anti-women.

What was so shocking about Melissa was JFP essentially was willing to sabotage a well respected vet, who was always professional and happy to be at work and didn’t complain. What she did to Jackie was just horrible, to try to wedge in Jensen who was no longer the draw she had been.

One of the things the Endgame story presented by Tony supposedly had in it was Luke and Laura were finally going to deal with Helena together and in effect, break the curse. And IIRC, it was going to make Stefan fully dark again, and deal with Nikolas either choosing his Laura side or Stefan. I think it was possible that Geary’s plans were going to cause Stephen Nichols to be essentially fired. I also recall reading something with Tony where he said the stuff with Stavros wasn’t part of that plan, essentially saying that when Luke kills somebody they stay dead. Not was the huge labyrinth below the hospital.

I know Tony was vocal BTS about hating Labine’s Luke being a family man. But resenting Laura didn’t start until after the story where Laura woke up from her catatonic state. Both Tony and Genie thought having that wedding was corny and not earned, just shoehorned in for the anniversary. Genie has even said it wasn’t exactly what was pitched to her, even if that was the plan all along neither one of them was aware at first.

One the one hand, I did get part of where Geary was coming from. The spectre of Laura haunted Luke and he did languish when Genie was on leave or gone from the show. And after that second wedding was kind of forced on them both, it seemed like they both publicly soured on the idea of being paired again in the exact same ways as they always were. Genie wanted to mature Laura, and Tony wanted to regress Luke. I think his instincts were all wrong to try to damage the couple after the fact with affairs and nonsense. With their beginnings and continued volatility there was always enough to play without ruining what we saw onscreen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

I know Amber was put off pretty quickly because Riche was direct and supportive, and JFP is anything but either of those things. Riche was no slouch, but she wasn’t out to cut up other women. And Sarah was rightfully pissed that all of a sudden her input was no longer even listened to, but Maurice was still able to do what he wanted if he felt like something wasn’t working or didn’t suit him.

As others have stated, she just decimated the women within a year of arriving, and it really was Vanessa and Guza/Pratt writing such a tight story around her that saved her. And she repaid that by trying to put Vanessa in her place, and never saw ratings as good again, virtually almost killing the show a slow painful death. Guza helped of course, and Brian Frons too.

She would have started the Vanessa train of signing 1 to 2 year deals only, but she was worth it as Carly. Just like Vanessa was worth her wish for early shooting with a newborn and never more than 3 days a week. When you have a strong show, 3 days a week is more than enough for a lead and actually makes you write for more characters.

I still find it so hysterical that it was Steve’s idea to get Robin back on the show and the first thing she said was she didn’t want to do Jason/Robin again.

Edited by titan1978
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

Which is ironic, because Luke's dream in life was to BE a family man.  Luke wanted the house in the suburbs, with the white picket fence, and the two cars in the driveway, and the 2.4 kids and the dog, just as much as Laura.  Part of what drew Luke to Laura, in fact, was the hope and belief that he could have those things with her, even as he struggled to overcome his past and his feelings that he never could measure up to her.

Seriously, Bill Bell would never have put up with so much interference from his actors.  He would've told someone like Tony Geary to say the g*ddamn lines and STFU.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What kills me is that Laura ended up being the character that was damaged by the family life stuff, not Luke. Not at first, but she was the one who became weaker, was worried about danger all the time and lost some of that spark that made Laura and Luke a good team, beyond just romantic partners. She started to be kind of like saint Laura. By Labine’s last year she’s just a dull, handwringing mess. A lot of characters were coasting then because Labine was so focused on Stone, which was an important story.

Guza’s first (and best) stint corrected a lot of the issues with the Damian story, which set them back up as a pair fighting an obstacle, followed by deeply emotional stories with Lulu’s bone marrow transplant and the turmoil of her secret son, Nikolas. Both of them really do shine in very emotional, grounded material.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can't remember what they did with Stefan at this time. I know Stephen Nichols left after Chloe was murdered. He wanted to leave, right? Was he back for Endgame? I know they had the awful return a few years later that trashed Stefan and killed him. 

I didn't realize Geary and Genie had bad feelings about the mid '00s wedding. To me Tony's hostility toward the pairing started popping up onscreen around '98 or '99, as they started all but saying that Luke was sleeping with prostitutes through the marriage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Also, even watching the show on YouTube Luke was never a traditional dad. His beliefs about his character were never shown onscreen. Luke of 1983-1999 just would not have cheated on Laura. He would have adored any baby he made with Laura. I think the show spent enough time showing that he wasn’t comfortable being back in Port Charles as far as being settled down. But they never stopped his having adventures. Labine said she just wasn’t the writer for a new adventure caper every year, that it had to be more grounded than that for her. And her mob stories with them, Sonny, and Frank Smith actually worked and were plenty of action for that time and that tone with the show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It was in one of those more candid interviews she has given in the last decade. She said it was kind of foisted on them after the deals were done and both of them didn’t feel like it was earned, and they both felt like going anywhere near a big wedding was just a bad idea because it would always be compared to the actual iconic wedding.

I think he was still there when Geary pitched it, and I didn’t really remember him playing a part when it happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Guza and the Brenda return was great writing although it was getting rough towards the end because the show burned through so much material in such a short time.  It was also just the exact right time for her to return-not too long for people to forget about Brenda but long enough for people to want it.  Plus, she was also distracting the audience to make Genie/Laura's exit seem not as bad as it actually was.

SJB was worth a one year deal and I believe when they hired TB the intention was to kill Carly off entirely, so why not work with Sarah?

I will never get over how much they worked Vanessa in those six months.  I can't even tell you a non Brenda story in those months because the entire show revolved around her (which I was totally fine with).  I also would completely accept Brenda being on 2 or 3 times a week and find it insane JFP couldn't capitulate to reasonable demands by an actress that was carrying the show.  The show fell apart within weeks of Brenda's exit.  Kelly Monaco wasn't the draw anyone thought lol.  It just reeks of jealousy or bitterness on JFP's part in all these situations with the female cast.

Lol.  I agree.  It was funny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Plenty of people have said Tony wanted to morph Luke into Bill by the late 2000’s. Having watched a lot of 1992 recently, that tracks. The person he describes is Bill, not Luke.

I think these points are why it was such a hit too. It was Vanessa who was a legit draw for the show at that time. It wasn’t so far gone that the audience that loved her was all gone, and it helped the blow with Genie and just how sad that exits story was. The audience that had lapsed were not so far out of the habit that Brenda coming back was going to have interest. And the story was moving, you had to watch because it lit a fire under the show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

I hated it and hated how Laura came off in that story - like a deluded, helpless invalid. Her brief 2008 return to tie the loose end of Luke and Laura up was far superior for both Genie and Laura, warts and all.

JFP was largely creatively powerless after 2002, as she should've been. But you are right about her instincts. I'll never forget how she ran off Sarah and Amber.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it also really helped that Vanessa/Brenda was Guza's favorite female to write for.  It's not that I think Guza hated Laura exactly.  He just never really understood her and probably didn't find Laura appealing to write for as a mature woman.  I have no idea why it went so wrong in 2010 for Guza and Brenda because that really should have been an easy slam dunk for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   1 member




  • Recent Posts

    • I also wonder if it was considered controversial at the time to show a morally corrupt doctor?(another character troupe for Agnes Nixon, the upstanding male citizen who is hiding secrets back at home) Up until the early 1970s, prime-time would very rarely tell stories about the private lives of doctors, because advertisers tended to shy away from such content. @robbwolff -- so is this wrong that Ruth dated David before marrying Joe?  Dr. David Thornton is a fictional character from the ABC daytime soap opera All My Children, portrayed by Paul Gleason from 1976 to 1978.  He was introduced as a respected physician in Pine Valley, presenting himself as a widower to his colleagues at the hospital. This facade, however, concealed a darker truth: his wife, Edna Thornton, was alive, and he was leading a double life. David’s character is defined by manipulation and secrecy, as he maintained a carefully curated public image while engaging in deceitful and criminal behavior in his personal life. His relationships were marked by control and betrayal, particularly in his marriage to Edna and his romantic entanglements with other women. David’s charm and professional status allowed him to navigate Pine Valley’s social circles, but his actions revealed a calculating and ruthless nature. Career David was a doctor at Pine Valley Hospital, where he was well-regarded by his peers for his medical expertise. His professional life provided him with a veneer of respectability, which he exploited to mask his personal misdeeds. However, his career was not a central focus of his storyline; instead, it served as a backdrop to his personal schemes. His position at the hospital gave him access to resources, such as the drug digitalis, which he later used in his attempt to murder his wife. David’s professional life unraveled as his criminal actions came to light, tarnishing his reputation in the medical community. Personal Relationships and Family David’s family and romantic relationships were fraught with tension and deception, shaping much of his narrative arc: Edna Thornton (Wife): David was married to Edna Thornton, with whom he had a daughter, Dottie. To his colleagues, he claimed Edna was deceased, allowing him to pursue other relationships without suspicion. In reality, David was plotting to kill Edna, motivated by his desire to be free of her and possibly to gain financial or personal freedom. He began poisoning her with digitalis, a heart medication, which caused her to experience heart pains. Edna was unaware of David’s true intentions until after his death, when the truth about his poisoning scheme was revealed. Dottie Thornton (Daughter): David and Edna’s daughter, Dottie Thornton, was a significant character in All My Children. Portrayed by Dawn Marie Boyle (1977–1980) and later Tasia Valenza (1982–1986), Dottie was raised primarily by Edna. David’s neglectful and manipulative behavior extended to his daughter, as he showed little genuine care for her well-being. Dottie’s life was impacted by her father’s actions, particularly after his death, when Edna became a wealthy widow. Dottie later married Thaddeus “Tad” Martin in 1985, though their marriage ended in divorce in 1986, and she suffered the loss of an unborn child with Tad. Ruth Parker (Fiancée, 1976): David was engaged to Ruth Parker in 1976, furthering his pattern of deceit since he was still married to Edna. His engagement to Ruth, who was also involved with Jeff Martin, highlighted David’s willingness to manipulate romantic partners for his own gain. The engagement did not lead to marriage, as David’s true intentions and double life began to surface. Christina “Chris” Karras (Lover, 1978): In 1978, David began a romantic relationship with Dr. Christina “Chris” Karras, a fellow physician. This affair added another layer of complexity to his web of lies, as Chris was unaware of his marriage to Edna and his poisoning scheme. After David’s death, Chris was initially accused of his murder due to their relationship and her access to medical resources. However, Jeff Martin’s investigation cleared her name by proving David’s death was caused by his own actions. Parents: David’s parents are unnamed in the source material, and both are noted as deceased. No further details are provided about their influence on his life or their role in his backstory. Death David Thornton’s death in 1978 was a dramatic and fitting conclusion to his villainous arc, brought about by his own treachery. Intent on killing Edna to escape their marriage, David had been secretly administering digitalis to her, causing her heart issues. In a twist of fate, their daughter, Dottie, innocently switched Edna’s drink with David’s during one of his poisoning attempts. Unaware that the drink was laced with a lethal dose of digitalis, David consumed it and suffered a fatal heart attack. His death was initially investigated as a possible murder, with Chris Karras as the prime suspect due to her relationship with David and her medical knowledge. However, Dr. Jeff Martin conducted a toxicology screen on David’s body, which revealed that the digitalis poisoning was the cause of both Edna’s heart pains and David’s death. This evidence exonerated Chris and exposed David’s plan to kill his wife, cementing his legacy as a tragic and self-destructive figure. Impact and Legacy David Thornton’s storyline, though relatively short-lived (1976–1978), was impactful due to its intensity and the ripple effects on other characters. His death left Edna a wealthy widow, altering her and Dottie’s circumstances and setting the stage for further drama, including Edna’s manipulation by conman Ray Gardner. David’s actions also strained relationships among other Pine Valley residents, particularly through his engagement to Ruth Parker and affair with Chris Karras, which intersected with Jeff Martin’s storyline. His character exemplified the classic soap opera archetype of a charming yet duplicitous villain whose downfall is precipitated by his own hubris. Additional Notes Portrayal: Paul Gleason’s performance as David Thornton brought a compelling intensity to the role, making the character memorable despite his brief tenure. Gleason’s ability to portray both charm and menace suited David’s dual nature as a respected doctor and a scheming husband. Storyline Context: David’s arc occurred during the early years of All My Children, a period when the show focused on intricate personal dramas and moral dilemmas. His poisoning plot and double life were emblematic of the show’s penchant for high-stakes interpersonal conflict. Lack of Additional Family Details: Beyond Edna and Dottie, no other family members (such as siblings or extended relatives) are mentioned in the source material, limiting the scope of his familial connections. Conclusion Dr. David Thornton was a multifaceted antagonist in All My Children, whose life was marked by professional success, personal deception, and a fatal miscalculation. As a doctor, he wielded authority and respect, but his secret plan to murder his wife, Edna, revealed a cold and calculating core. His relationships with Edna, Dottie, Ruth Parker, and Chris Karras were defined by manipulation, and his death by accidental self-poisoning was a poetic end to his schemes. David’s legacy in Pine Valley lived on through Edna’s newfound wealth and Dottie’s subsequent storylines, making him a pivotal figure in the show’s early narrative. His story remains a classic example of soap opera drama, blending betrayal, tragedy, and retribution.
    • The only blonde I see is one of the actual women staring at first & then screaming & running later.  DAYS: Vivian's manservant Ivan is in a long curly red wig. 

      Please register in order to view this content

      Y&R: long straight black wig is the actor Peter Barton whose character name I am blanking on.   
    • I very much liked office Cleary and the actress who portrayed her (as you say, Mary Peterson).  A shame her turn didn't evolve into a contract role.   BTW, does anyone know the timeframe/years that Betty Rae served as casting director?  If i understand correctly, she not only led the effort for contract roles, but also for shorter 13- and 26-week roles.  IMO, GL had LOTS of very well-casted, limited roles, too. I'm surprised the actors throughout the soap industry, and especially P&G actors, have not assembled a book or something similar, praising Rae.  Each actor could write a few paragraphs or a page of text describing his or her experience.
    • No. Ruth had an extramarital affair with David while married to Joe.
    • I'm not sure I agree with Bernstein's children on that. Bernstein's life and activism here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonard_Bernstein#Social_activism_and_humanitarian_efforts
    • Thursday & Friday's episodes were excellent. The build-up was most definitely worth the wait (2 months). TMG, I can't give her enough accolades. AM, was also absolutely incredible. I think the fallout is going to have a ripple effect. The little clues that have been dropped,  hopefully, will weave seamlessly to reveal even bigger bombshells for the Dupree's and Martin.
    • Thanks, msn drives me nuts on the one hand but on the other hand their headlines appeal to me. And, I just don't do FoxNews.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy