Jump to content

Ratings from the 70's


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

No.

 

In 1973, “All My Children’s” Erica Kane (Susan Lucci) was the first TV character to have a legal abortion. It was the same year as the Supreme Court Roe v. Wade ruling, so it was a controversial storyline to say the least. “All My Children” protected themselves against the controversy by writing in that Erica mentally blocked the abortion, even thinking for a while that she miscarried. Erica would tipify free choice.

 

https://soaps.sheknows.com/all-my-children/news/23249/all-my-children-throwback-thursday-poll-ericas-ab/

 

All My Children, “February 1, 1973” (1973)

 
All My Children became the first TV show to depict an abortion following Roe V. Wade. In the episode, Erica Kane (Susan Lucci) decides to terminate an unplanned pregnancy so she can pursue her modeling career. “It seemed to me exactly what Erica would choose to do,” Lucci tells Refinery29. 

https://www.refinery29.com/en-us/abortion-on-tv-history

 

https://pennylaneismyrealname.com/a-timeline-of-abortion-stories-in-us-popular-media/

 

 

1973  All My Children (Soap Opera, ABC)

Erica Kane (Susan Lucci) has daytime TV’s first legal abortion. Her abortion was simply because she didn’t want to have the child. Nothing bad happened to her.

Edited by JoeCool
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I literally have the scripts. It was May 1971

I have almost every script from 1970 - 1984.

Jeff and Erica married Dec 1970. She found out she was pregnant soon after. Jeff seemed somewhat agreeable to an abortion but then talked it over with his father Joe and changed his mind. Erica told him she would get the abortion whether he agreed or not.

She went to New York and lied about having her husband's approval (it was legal but only with a husband consenting) then ended up with septicaemia. Which is how Jeff found out. Mary Kenicott was introduced around this time.

Edited by will81
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well then the media got it all wrong.  It was 1973. 

https://ew.com/gallery/all-my-children-15-classic-moments/

 

One of the many groundbreaking things she did to become the iconic Erica Kane was portray TV's first legal abortion the same year of the Roe v. Wade ruling. Of course, this being a soap opera, unbeknown to Erica the fetus was actually transplanted by the doctor into his wife and they raised the boy, Josh. As an adult, Josh would go after Erica.

 

Same year as Roe is 1973.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah they did. They get a ton of things wrong. In 1971 abortions were legal in New York with consent from the husband, Erica technically got a legal one but lied (If I remember correctly) about Jeff agreeing and so really was not legal. 

By 1973 Jeff was very much with Mary and Erica had been with Jason Maxwell.

If Erica had been pregnant in 1973, she wouldn't have needed to go behind Jeff's back and he frankly wouldn't have wanted her to be pregnant since they were already separated. 

Erica spent that year holding up the divorce. If she had been with baby, she would have used this against Jeff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 Did Erica go to NY for the abortion? Well wikepedia says May 1972. At this point it is mute. I would love to see a press clipping.

 

Getting back to fall 1974, AMC was doing very well in the ratings.

Soap Opera Digest says 1973. 

 

https://web.archive.org/web/20071226102140/http://www.soapoperadigest.com/features/special/lasttaboo/

 

ALL MY CHILDREN Head Writer Megan McTavish was responsible for Julia's abortion in 1995 and faced the same problems, even though that show had done daytime's first legal abortion with Erica in 1973. "I think it was more controversial in 1995, when we did Julia's than when Agnes [Nixon, AMC's creator] did Erica's," she says. "By the time we approached Julia's, the political and religious ramifications of the act had [become so divisive]. I think [ABC] handled it very smartly — in other words, they didn't try to slip it on anybody. We warned everybody first. We told the advertisers that this would be the content and we left it up to them whether or not they chose to advertise." And while some sponsors chose to drop out, "In those days, we certainly had no lack of people who were willing to advertise."

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You must be right. Looking over the storyline timeframes. 1973 is too late. NY had legal abortion in 1970. Media got it wrong as did I. My sincere apologies. Many thanks! @will81

 

Agnes Nixon was an excellent contemporary writer. Miss her and her writing. Way ahead of her time.

Edited by JoeCool
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
 
Not much soap coverage in newspapers in 1971 and 1972, but I did find two clippings for you which match what Will said...it happened in 1971:
 

Please register in order to view this content

 
Here's a 1972 article talking about it as well:
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks for that. It is so odd to me that it barely rated a mention back then. Even the casual style they write about the story in the first article seems so odd. 

I don't believe prime time was touching topics like this, not really, so I would have thought there would have been more. Though I know soaps were not really talked about much back then. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Also Joe, Kathy Phillips on Search for Tomorrow went to New York state & got an abortion. There were 3 states that had legal abortion in 1970 but New York state was the only state without a residency requirement. So there are 3 abortions of note in daytime history. Pat Randolph, AW, illegal. Erica Kane, AMC, and Kathy Phillips, SFT. Both New York state & legal. This is also discussed in the ERRORS topic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's been an interesting journey but also something of a beast. P&G, in their way, did no publicity about the SFT abortion. AMC, in their way, did loads but it was in error because it claimed to be a Roe abortion meaning 1973 which turned out to be wrong. We still do not have a close date for the SFT one like Will's script & the articles Jason47 just provided for the AMC one. There's a soap publication that confirms its existence but the possible date range is unfortunately long. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • That was my point really. These anniversary party scenes are the first ones, and now they won't be able to use them (meaning these actual scenes, as aired, with OG Ted). They can recreate them but I doubt they will spring for all the extras to come back and film and recreate everything, so it will be more like tight closed in shots of Ted with one or two other actors, or snippets of Leslie's original speech where Ted wasn't visible. It would be hard to recapture the original energy of the scenes are as they were filmed in their full context. I just think that's too bad, but maybe they will prove me wrong. I never really saw what was so off in his portrayal to warrant a recast, anyway, so that colors my perception as well.
    • Yeah, and quite honestly, are there really that many scenes that are flashback-worthy at this point in the run?
    • I know at one point they were on Hulu & i-Tunes. I just checked it on JustWatch.com & it indicates 1 season on Prime Video & on AppleTV. Have fun!
    • That era is so weird...they made a big deal out of all three of those characters and then they just..disappeared! Not that I am complaining. We talk about the bad out of character writing for Alex under JFP..but this was one example that may have led them to write her being so obsessive with Nick.  WHY would Alex accept Flock of Seagulls guy as her brother? They had her in one scene (setting up the Alan return) complain that Alan abandoned her...she blackmailed him into leaving town and she had been angry at him for helping Brandon with Lujack and also using Spaulding for that dumb dreaming death thing. Endless scenes of her with Simon, I can't believe Bev wasn't bored to death! I would also add Pam writing the scene where she lets Ms. Sally die in front of her to protect Alan and  the writing for Alex could be screwy even before JFP.
    • On this day 34 years ago the final episode of Dallas and came in at an astonishing #2 in the ratings after two straight seasons of weak ratings. Interesting Knots was #27 for that week as well:  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Thank you for clearing that up. I wasn't watching GL regularly yet at that point, but seems to me I should have remembered the big wedding after Leslie's death (which I do remember) described in the profile. Is there a web archive of SOD summaries, or are referring to your own personal collection?
    • I was bummed that 2.0 ended because Mcpherson (headwriter) had really set up some interesting stories and we never got to find out where the stories would go once they resumed production on 'season 2'. I remembered the EP (Ginger Smith) and a lot of the stars gave a lot of credit to McPherson being able to come in on very short notice and come up with stories/plots (I think it was a very short turnaround time of a few weeks).  It was nice that she got to redeem herself after her year long Days stint was not well reviewed/liked.
    • Enters                                 Speaks

      Please register in order to view this content

           
    • It seems like a setup for failure to review a single episode of a soap, but Cleveland Amory was a foolish man.  His taste was so predictable, that one wondered why bother reviewing a medium he so clearly disliked. (found on Facebook retro TV group) Another case in point of his misogyny from his review of Dark Shadows (Can you imagine the magazine with the widest circulation in the country insulting its customer in this way today?)

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • They could easily be re-created, or even re-shot in different ways, especially if they were re-shooting scenes at some point, as well.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy