Jump to content

Ratings from the 70's


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Does anyone have any thoughts why DOOL and AW expanded but outside of a test episode, the Doctors wasn't?  Was the test episode poorly received?  You would think a solid three-hour/three show block would do better than having a bloated AW.  2:30. then later 2pm was a death blow for AW, as it would linger for twenty more years but never again really be competitive.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I've wondered more than once. The idea for the expansion came from NBC & from Fred Silverman,  & another programmer there, a woman, named Len somebody, worked first with AW & did a standalone episode for one hour, a wedding, and made plans to go full-time for an hour with the understanding that if it worked they would continue on to DOOL. It worked. They did. Except DOOL's standalone was something else, not a wedding. Then, they did a standalone hour long for THE DOCTORS. Then, the information stops. Fred Silverman was again behind the idea to take AW to 90 minutes. There was a big fight over that. Silverman & Rauch won & Lemay lost & subsequently quit as HW. And, it was an epic failure & the affiliates hated it & blamed AW. So why did they stop & pull up short on their own process of implementation when it came to DOC?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

A New York Times article back in 1974 said NBC was planning one-hour trial episodes of The Doctors and Days of our Lives.

I could be wrong, but I thought that The Doctors did two one-hour trial episodes. I think one was around March 1976 when Nick came back to save Althea's life after an injury. And the other was from spring of 1977 when Carolee finally made her way back to Madison.

Even after the 90-minute Another World failed, NBC was still toying with expanding Days of our Lives to 90 minutes. Many, many years ago, I had a book that specifically looked at television in 1979 and the AW expansion and the proposed DOOL expansion were discussed in the chapter on soaps. NBC was making a bunch of questionable decisions in 1979 in addition to the AW expansion, including the disastrous Supertrain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

None of the information I've been able to find refers to a second standalone episode for the DOC or for any discussion of 90 minutes for DOOL. Elana Levine's book is very comprehensive about the expansion but has nothing in it about the 90 minute experiment. I will say that NBC was very intent on their plans, as they developed them & that they seemed foolhardy in the chances they were willing to take. My favorite quote is that (paraphrasing now) the NBC programmers went to a 90 minute show with AW because they couldn't think of anything better to do differently. I'm always interested in additional info on this subject. Listening to the audio interview of Pete is well worth the hour it takes. WOST Interviewer who caught him at an awards show in 2006. He is who named Fred Silverman. That can be found on YouTube.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

According to Danny Hill, who posts a lot of classic soap episodes, The Doctors did two one-hour tests -- one in 1975 and the other in 1977. He said it also aired a 90-minute test in 1976. That's when Althea fell through a window and Nick Bellini returned to save her life.

This is the book that discussed the expansion of Another World and stated that NBC was still considering expanding Days. The soaps section of the book included photos. I distinctly recall a photo or two of the Ryan's from Ryan's Hope.

 

 

 

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Lin Bolen was the daytime VP who initiated the expansion of AW and then DOOL.

Remember the ratings fight in the 70's was fierce as each network bid for supremacy.

CBS had been knocked from their longstanding #1 position and it was determined to regain it, and NBC and ABC both close competitors.

When the expanded AW improved the 3.30 -4.00 ratings at nowhere near the cost of a separate soap, DOOL quickly followed suit.

I think the issue with The Doctors might have been Colgate-Palmolive, owners of the show. There might have been reluctance on their part to pony up the extra dollars needed. Also, from a practical point of view, The Doctors did not have the studio space necessary for the extra sets required for a 60 min show.

SOD mentioned DOOL going to 90 min but I'm not sure how far that got. As soon as the AW ratings came in there would have been 2nd thuughts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, and thank goodness they finally paused to think!! Oh, boy, was that ever needed! Len Bolen, yes, was the woman they used to implement activities with the shows. Thnks. Have not had even a minute to look up her last name. She was clear that it would cost more than double to do (an hour) but that they would "somehow" make up that amount because they would have so much more in ad revenues. After they had been doing an hour not very long at all, Pete Lemay began to find flaws in many areas of production & in results. I have numerous quotes from him, at any point that someone is interested. He was initially very enthused & wanted to write 7-8 minute scenes but his feelings about it went "that-away" as they ended up just doing more 2-3 minute scenes, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Colgate-Palmolive was the only thing I could think of, where they didn't seem to fit. And, that studio space was an issue for them is of note because Agnes Nixon said she would never expand & while she was at it she told Lemay she thought he'd gone crazy, literally lost his mind, that's how against expansion she was. What ABC did was apply a carrot, a big carrot, more studio space, a significant increase in it & she came right over to the expansion side!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've just done an examination of the ratings for 20 years of ratings, beginning with 1969-1970 and ending with 1988-1989. I paid attention to all ABC soaps, all Debuts, all Final Seasons, all bottom rated and Y&R and AW. GH was never the bottom rated soap. GH was also never the lowest rated ABC soap. GH was 10th of 19; 6th of 17; 2nd of 17; 4th of 17; 5th of 16; 8th of 14; 10th of 14; 10th of 15; 9th of 14; 2nd of 14; 1st of 13; 1st of 13; 1st of 15; 1st of 14; 1st of 14; 1st of 14; 1st of 13; 1st of 14; 1st of 12; 2nd of 13. And, that last, when GH slipped to 2nd was Y&R's first #1, 1988-1989. The 1970s rankings were 1 ATWT 2 AW and 3 DOOL. The 1980s rankings were 1 GH 2 AMC 3 Y&R and 4 OLTL. One thing that is clear in looking at these 20 years of ratings is that ABC was THE POWERHOUSE of ratings, hands down, CBS & NBC eat your hearts out! Trying to look to imagine what was making ABC think that maybe GH should be either fixed or killed, we have to look at these years: GH was 10th of 19; 6th of 17; 2nd of 17; 4th of 17; 5th of 16; 8th of 14; 10th of 14; 10th of 15; 9th of 14; 2nd of 14; three 10th place, one 9th place and one 8th place. That's gotta be where it came from. I looked up Tom Donovan & he was either a director or a producer (both were said) at GH from 1985-2006. I'll have to find out which he was. Reading 3 of your posts here gave me the ideas I needed to pursue to learn this more about GH during that time. Thnks for the inspiration. I'll take my leave of you now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You should watch the interviews with Fred Silverman when he was at ABC on the EMMYs website and also on Youtube.  Fred was a fan of Agnes Nixon's All My Children and of Agnes. When Fred came to ABC, GH was a mess and Fred was the one who said either you improve this or it is gone. When things got better at GH and OLTL he expanded them to 45 then to an 1 hour. It was All My Children that was the leader when Fred took over and remained ABC's top soap until 1980.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Some people say that he & Irna Phillips were the only people to deal with all 3 broadcast networks. I am suspect of that so I figure what it really means is that they were the first, which I do believe to be accurate. And, he accumulated so much power! Of course, he was big into the network where he was for each tenure during what was called 'the network era'. He conceived of the two 45 min. shows making up a 90 min. block. He did one thing that I do not understand.  Here's what he did with OLTL & GH:

OLTL 30 to 45 July 26, 1976      45 to 1 hr Jan. 16, 1978.

GH 30 to 45 July 26, 1976      45 to 1 hr Dec. 1, 1975

Why did he leave OLTL at 45 for 2 extra years?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Silverman was trying to create a 3hour serial/daytime drama block gradually.  He left OLTL for expansion last since the show had fierce competition with ATWT and AW. Once OLTL expanded, ATWT was being strongly challenged by AMC and AW and eventually fell from the top. OLTL also was the lowest ranked among AMC and GH and OLTL so Fred Silverman did it gradually. At the end, a strong 3 hour block was created and last it almost 35 years on ABC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought that One Life to Live and the serial General Hospital expanded to 45-minutes and later to 60-minutes on the same days.   The game shows that had been airing on ABC (such as Family Feud) eventually disappeared or moved to the mornings.  The Edge of Night was airing during the final timeslot that ABC aired.    Ryan's Hope was moved initially to a timeslot which was thirty minutes earlier initially.   (And Ryan's Hope later switched timeslots with Loving - and many people had said that this led to the cancellation of Ryan's Hope).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That is funny to me because I thought that, too! Then, when confronted with the two different dates I was just gob-smacked. LOL I couldn't figure that out at all! Thnkx Joe for the explanation. Here I was thinking that they were mistreating OLTL when actually they were giving it its best shot because it was up against both CBS's toughest competition and NBC's toughest competition! (at that time) 2 p.m. was just the time to beat! And, oh, yeah, I will definitely look for those interviews! Thnx again.

Edited by Tonksadora
a thought
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I was talking about 1986, but the glimpses of 1982 are about the same. 
    • I skimmed some of the 1982 synopses; Steve was planning on an opening an office in Finland, and I think Jim went there as part of the preparation. That probably was a big issue; AW had already gone to San Diego that year, with Rachel/Steve/Mitch. And to upstate NY with Pete and Diana. I wonder if upstate was as expensive lol  AW in 1982 has always fascinated me, because of how messy it was 
    • That makes sense. What a messy time for the show. And any changes they made were mostly for the worse.
    • The transition from Neal to Adam was very abrupt, and to be honest my theory is that the character of Neal was designed so that we think he is super shady but then it turns out that he was on the side of good all along so Neal could have seamlessly become a hero of the BCPD with no need for Adam. I don't know whether Robert Lupone was hired on a short contract or if he was fired from a longer-term contract because they decided they wanted someone who was more of a leading man type, but I can imagine a scenario where Charles Grant did both the undercover Egyptian treasure/flirt with Victoria and the straighter-arrow day to day police investigation. But in my imagined scenario the MJ prostitution plotline probably doesn't exist and instead he probably continues a relationship with Victoria. The story seems very odd to me. I assume that David Canary would have been included only because a plotline where Steve is going to Finland in which only Rachel is seen in actual Finland seems unlikely. The synopses explicitly mention that Alice can't go with Steve but would whoever was playing Alice at that time have had the kind of clout to get the remote cancelled? It also strikes me as unlikely that production would have approved the expensive location shoot and *then* cancelled it only because of jealousy. It seems more likely that they rejected it because of the expense but then the jealousy part got added to the gossip speculatively, possibly because while it was being worked out they justified not including more castmembers because of the expense. 
    • My comment has nothing to do with cast resentment, but does relate to the Finland location shoot: It may be a coincidence, but Jim Matthews died in Finland in 1982.  Hugh Marlowe's final episode was in April 1982, but the character probably didn't die untll May or June. (I'm unable to find the character's date of death, only the date of Marlowe's final episode). SInce Jim and Rachel had very little interaction after around 1975, it is unlikely Jim's death in Finland had any connection to Rachel's potential visit, but the choice to have Jim die in that location at that time is a head-scratcher.  I'm sure the writers sent Jim on an extended trip (and off-screen) because of Marlowe's illness.  But Finland seems like a strange choice considering the (then) recently cancelled location shoot.  
    • I totally understand your sloths concern about it and I agree with you. Let’s hope the show plays it’s cards right.    Further comments about the last few episodes: - I liked that one of the attendees was filming the scene. That’s realistic. I wonder if the writers will follow up with that.  - Martin and Smitty trying to drag Leslie out was very heteronormative, so perfectly in line with them two as characters lol.    As for the future: it’s obvious the Duprees will come to accept Eva one way or another, but the rivalry with Kay should be here for the long term   On the topic of acting: the only bad actors I’m seeing are Ted and Derek. Tomas hasn’t proven to be either good or bad, so far, but he’s certainly mediocre and uncharismatic. He sucks the energy out of the scenes and I don’t see any couple of women ever vying for him. 
    • I’m trying to think which actors VW were working with at the time, and none of them had been there for a while. Even like Mac and Ada didn’t have that big of a part in Rachel’s storyline.  And Jamie was involved with all that movie stuff.
    • Brooke did ads before ATWT too. That probably helped get her the job. After ATWT she seemed to branch more into hosting, along with ads.  I think I saw Kelley in an ad or two, but you're right she wasn't on as much. 
    •   Thanks for sharing these. I wonder if Charles might have been in the running for Adam. I know Preacher was a bit of a bad boy at times on EON, but Neal seemed to be a step down, and Robert Lupone had played a similar part on AMC. Given the huge cast turnover at this point I wonder who thought they had been there long enough to go.  Laura Malone/Chris Rich would get a remote within the next year. 
    • Interesting.  It seems to allude to that statement that Warren Burton made around that time about some AW actors getting special treatment.  I wonder who was resentful about not getting to go. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy