Jump to content

Women's health website reviews AMC's HPV storyline


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

She brings up some valid points but her issues seem to stem more from AMC exploring an issue that she clearly cares deeply about in a format that she clearly finds frivolous. I understand where she's coming from but if she was hoping for 100% realism and accuracy with regard to this topic, she's not going to find it on a soap, in fact she's not going to find it on any TV drama.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I was surprised when she said she used to be hooked on soaps, because a lot of her writing came across to me as someone who only knew the parody idea of soaps. Not that soaps have done anything in the last 10-15 years to be worthy of an objective look. I do wish they'd mentioned that AMC did have a history of breaking new ground in stories about health issues for women...even if some of those stories weren't handled well in the long run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

She's one of the millions of people who quit watching soaps over the years so clearly the genre stopped working for her a long time ago.

To be fair, the article isn't about soaps and what they've done, it's about this one story and what she considers to be the failure of this story to address the topic of HPV correctly. She's coming at it from the perspective of someone who sick of seeing bad information about women's health shown on television in the name of drama. I disagree with her on some of her points mainly because she's going by recaps and that's a losing proposition but she admits that she didn't watch so I think she was fair. Also, we're working with a cancellation timeline. The story has been rushed because of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

To be fair, as someone pointed out in the comments, a lot of this WAS covered in later episodes--and she didn't go in looking for an STD test. I think they handled it better than bpast STD stories (aside from HIV) I've heard of, but of course as marceline says it IS a soap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Holly's final big story was the Sebastian mess in late 2004.   Vanessa and Matt were promoted to regulars near the end and were heavily recurring prior to that starting around 2007/2008.
    • Keith has a softer presence, but it would have helped to see him be more aggressive or proactive in protecting them instead of standing around like a mannequin. A man the audience should be hoping and wishing gets back together with his wife. Nicole needs a new husband!
    • She needs to learn to be honest with her husband about her lusty interests because being sex positive only works if you're not cheating on your spouse.
    • https://x.com/JermaineRivers/status/1922782226317529409       https://x.com/JermaineRivers/status/1931204864136396907
    • Very disappointed in the writers in the way they are screwing with Nicole, Ted,  and Kat to make Leslie remain viable. So many holes everywhere.
    • Somebody brought this up elsewhere which emphasizes why this NuTed appears as such a weakling. Why is Kat doing what HE should be doing? And that's everything he can to rid him and his family of this crazy woman. Kat is doing all kinds of things she shouldn't do but now I understand her more. She can't count on her father to eliminate this woman because he's a wimp. He's been too busy inviting her into his home and serving her drinks and offering her invitations to birthday parties. WIMP!!!!
    • It's Men's Mental Health Month.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • This is (maybe) overly simplistic and nonsoapy, but Doug needs to go to Gamblers Anonymous, to deal with the addictive neurological excitement hits that gambling gives him - and which control his life. Vanessa needs to go to therapy to find ways to remain healthfully lusty and sex-positive, but to stay away from anyone who would demean her.
    • YT keeps commending GL clips to me. I discovered Kathleen Cullen was on in Christmas 1987. Was there any talk of making it permanent  or was this just a special visit? I wish they had made the visit permanent. I liked her chemistry with Grant Aleksander.  
    • I'm not sure it's as unpopular as you think.  I just think the show knew they were in a bind, and needed a proven couple for the viewers to invest in. Trying to reunite Vanessa and Ross had just failed in 87. I don't think Ed and Holly's affair was well received, as Simon and Garrett had a brother/sister chemistry. Enter Billy and Vanessa, who give you history and an out not to try and do a Josh/Reva/Billy triangle, which would've really wrecked the relationship between Josh and Billy. I'd have been ok with trying Vanessa/Ross again, and doing a Vanessa/Ross/Holly/Billy quad for a while. I hated Nadine. HATED. She had to be the most insufferable also-ran before ATWT's Julia Lindsay. This is where I wish I knew Roger's history better.

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy