Jump to content

5 Years Later - Are the Soaps better or worse?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 20
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Five years ago was the spring of 2006, which was the beginning of a weird transitional time for DAYS. That was when we got the news that Hogan Sheffer was coming aboard, and Beth Milstein began interim head-writing, and there was all the 'Koala Barf' business. So there was a lot of fun, interesting stuff as JER's stale stories were swept away and a bunch of promising new stuff took its place. Just prior to that, though, the show was a bunch of dead wood. Zach's death was good, but there was so much unfocused garbage. The Alex North story was an incomprehensible disaster; Billie spent like six months raping Bo when he was out of it; Kayla was just wandering around asking Steve if he remembered anything yet; that Sami/Austin/Carrie/Lucas story was a hideous, lifeless rehash of a ten-year-old story. It was almost uniformly atrocious, and it managed to be simultaneously unfocused and so narrowly focused that nothing was a surprise.

The transition to the new writing regime was so exciting. It was the last time, prior to late 2009, when I got really excited about DAYS. But that all fell apart within a year, when we got the Colleen/Santo show, Touch the Sky (and the destruction of Chelsea/Nick, the best young couple this show had intro'd in years), Shelle on Tinda Lau, and more. So I guess that mid-2006 transitional period was very exciting, and there was tons of potential, but in retrospect, it was sort of artificial because very little of it delivered. For that reason, I'll go with now as being better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Agreed. 2003-2006 (i.e. Reilly 2.0) was DAYS at its all-time worst. But wasn't there like a few good weeks/couple months between Reilly FINALLY being dumped from DAYS and Hogan Sheffer joining that we had a lovely woman by the name of Beth Milstein who crafted some lovely wrap-ups to storylines? Cuz Lord knows the first half of 2006 was complete and utter CRAP! And then we had hit-or-miss with Sheffer's work in the latter half. But yes, there was that period where they tied up bad storylines and gave good pay-off to them, and started telling new tales in the meantime.

Oops should've read your post first. Agreed!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I'm not sure it's as unpopular as you think.  I just think the show knew they were in a bind, and needed a proven couple for the viewers to invest in. Trying to reunite Vanessa and Ross had just failed in 87. I don't think Ed and Holly's affair was well received, as Simon and Garrett had a brother/sister chemistry. Enter Billy and Vanessa, who give you history and an out not to try and do a Josh/Reva/Billy triangle, which would've really wrecked the relationship between Josh and Billy. I'd have been ok with trying Vanessa/Ross again, and doing a Vanessa/Ross/Holly/Billy quad for a while. I hated Nadine. HATED. She had to be the most insufferable also-ran before ATWT's Julia Lindsay. This is where I wish I knew Roger's history better.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • GROSS. Michael Swan was hot back in his ATWT days. Now he's 76 and WAY past his hot years.    
    • Since she kidnapped, locked up and tried to kill her father's wife I'd say that is still a pretty big deal
    • I'm good with the gushing, too. There aren't many soap icons like John Black, and that's important to celebrate and remember. And yes, life does go on for other characters, but as they say, timing is everything. Going sky diving the day before the funeral? And during a week of shows that were so powerful emotionally? No.    
    • No. There might have been a slight pause for dramatic effect after his "death," but pretty soon after they showed him in France getting plastic surgery and getting involved with his doctor, then planning with her to bring Christina to France. (She thought he had good reason to do it; she wasn't a bad person or anything). Now that I think of it, there must have been some kind of pause before that, during the 70s. Rita was accused of killing a private patient for an inheritance when she lived in Texas. Part of the backstory was that Roger had been there, too. Not sure exactly when or how long that was.
    • I've already stated that I don't like Doug being written as this meek and submissive. It was so lame watching him leave her like that. Vanessa can divorce him, but she then needs to get her thot ass into therapy. She's not only having sex with every guy she runs into, but is now having  sex with a skeevy perv on a poker table. I'm going to give the BTG some credit here. For months, many on this board were delighting in the Vanessa/Joey flirting and what they saw as chemistry. I think we're now seeing what the writers always intended -- that Joey is a disgusting POS wannabe mobster.
    • John Black actually was the ultimate good guy soap hero. So I don’t mind the town gushing over him. It’s deserved.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy