Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Gary has been involded in soaps for a number of years. From actor, to writing to producing on such shows as All my Children, Another World, Days of our Lives, Passions, Santa Barabara, Search for Tomoorw, Sunset Beach and Texas. What do you guys think are some of Tomlins strong and weak suites? Has any other soap person been on as many shows as Tomlin? Tomlin must have something to keep bouncing around on all theses shows. I did like what he did with Sunset Beach. Any one else want to share their Tomlin thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 38
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

They only won that because they submitted some special musical episodes if I recall. OLTL under him was like a Chippendales Revue every day of the week. I love beefcake as much as the next person, but I like a little substance to back that up. His OLTL was just pure camp with absolutely no depth. I think Frank and Ron understand that high camp is fine as long as it's balanced with some depth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, they certainly have a funny way of showing it! :-)

As a writer, he did some decent work on SANTA BARBARA and SEARCH FOR TOMORROW. Nothing earth-shattering, but certainly highly serviceable. As an EP, he also seems to be one who is unafraid to utilize vets in front-burner storylines. Perhaps with a better HW, though, we might see what he's really capable of.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The heart stuff and killing Sam Rappaport was Malone.

As for Tomlin, I thought his tenure started out as being very campy and a bit hollow, and then got very ugly and dark. The stuff with Viki being raped on her living room couch still disturbs me to this day. It was a very jarring transition and the stories were a mile wide and an inch deep.

The part of his run I enjoyed most was Roxy/Max.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

On DAYS, Tomlin seems to be all about quantity over quality. He just wants to shoot as many episodes as possible in the shortest time, all to save money. The production is awful. Alot of people on this board praise him for saving DAYS and working with such a low budget but the show has no quality anymore. Tomlin represents the nuDAYS (October 2008 - present) that I despise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I know GT likes his camp. I loved what he did with Sunset Beach. I just don't know anything about his writing. Thanks for all the responses. I give him props for getting Days together. though like others said it doe look very cheap. I expect Days to get campier as time goes on. They really went for it with this Rafe 2 storyline. With Chris Whitesell who was on the writing team I am surprsied they waited so long in their tenure to turn to camp as I knew it would happen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

When Tomlin first succeeded Ed Scott as Co-EP at DAYS, several went on-record saying how he wanted to get "back to basics" - and I still believe that that was his intention at the outset. DAYS had become so ridiculous and over-the-top that nothing was being taken seriously anymore by its fans, or garnering attention for the show that was in any way positive. Unfortunately, I feel Tomlin hit two stumbling blocks in his quest to make DAYS more grounded: Dena Higley and the show's own cast. Neither his HW nor his actors (save, of course, for veterans such as Suzanne Rogers and John Aniston) are capable of delivering the kind of first-rate, character-driven, non-campy drama that this show needed, and still needs, in order to become "legitimate" again in the eyes of fans and critics.

I might have said this before, but I feel very strongly that Tomlin could be a good, if not great, EP if he had the right HW to work with. Forget about production values; that's secondary, IMO, to solid writing; and with scripters such as David Cherrill, Richard and Carolyn Culliton, he has that. What he needs desperately, though, is a strong HW who can at least meet him halfway on his overall vision for a show, yet has the capabilities of telling solid stories about fully realized characters. The more grounded you can make the characters, IMO, the more willingly an audience will go along with the occasional flights of fancy. (Ex: The Paul Rauch/Peggy O'Shea era at OLTL.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Have you ever watched DAYS before August of last year? If not, how can you compare it?

Past decade you say. 2000-2003 and 2006-2007 were much better than the current episodes. 2004-2005 were awful but I would take those anyday over October 2008-present.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I do think he managed to take the show "back to basics" in some important ways. We went from a canvas where certain things were presumed -- John/Marlena would always be the leads; the DiMeras had to be behind everything; Kate was only good for interfering in her kids' lives; Maggie and Victor were not deserving of story -- to a situation where the show stepped back, looked at everything critically, and rebuilt from the ground up. I won't try to argue that every single decision has been brilliant, or that the execution has been stellar in every case, but this has to be one of the most successful instances of tearing a soap down to build it back up again. I truly don't think we would have Days on the air right now if not for Tomlin's work, so for that alone, I'm pretty grateful.

Totally a matter of opinion. I'm with Cheap -- I've found the show imminently more watchable the past two years or so than I did for probably 5-6 years before that. Something about it makes me want to watch 3-5 times a week. I don't think I'd felt that way all decade, besides for the start or climax of new stories or when a particularly interesting (usually hilarious) spoiler caught my attention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I can't fully remember, but I don't think they tried to get Beth Chamberlin back. I think Laibson/McTavish likely saw Beth as old news and wanted to move Philip on; either that or have her return only when Philip was closely tied to a new woman. Thanks as always for these recaps. I think I had stopped watching around this time and mostly kept up by reading in the soap magazines. Bridget's degradation was horrible to watch, as the character had grown so much over the years and was clearly regressed just to be a foil for a "hot" couple viewers had zero investment in. 
    • Having the majority of the cast on those low numbers is no way to tell story. And just 2 dayplayers for the month. So sad for the #1 soap.  
    • I believe it was. And this is actually one of the cases where I wouldn’t mind some dumb soap opera bringing back from the dead. They gave Mishael, Amanda, with all of Hilary’s connections but none of the personality except for fleeting moments. Hilary absolutely should’ve just left town. They decided to kill her and the baby. Just baffling,
    • That was Mal Young right? He thought a tragic death was a better option than crafting a story where Hilary leaves town. Was it a case of punishing someone who wants to leave? And then they have to jump through hoops to bring the actress back.
    • Ooo @TaoboiI will say I just watched Amanda give it to Abby and I loved it. Honestly just made me miss Hilary more. I will never understand or get over that decision to kill her off. Also call me crazy but I could definitely see the Damian actor playing NuTed on BTG. Very much still enjoying the Lily attraction.
    • I rewatched these episodes---they broke my heart. Somehow, Nola had seen Vanessa leave the hospital, and follows her home, and Maeve just lets out this primal scream---chills went down my spine. And knowing the history between them---never quite liking the other and always getting on each other's nerves (to put it mildly)---makes it a much richer to have them put it all aside in the moment and be family to each other. I've never seen/heard what Maeve thought of the story itself, but she did want a break, so it's not like she was fired and then brought back. Yes, Vanessa could be this stubborn and unwilling to ask for help. She'd pretty much always been an "I can do this on my own" type of woman, although when she first came to town, she would still run to Henry. But after she met Billy, she stopped relying on her father. It's part of the reason she (briefly) got addicted to pills after Bill's birth---she was determined to take care of him all by herself and became obsessed with the idea she was the only one who could. Of course, nothing before to this extreme. I should say, there's no way (IMO) they could've told this story---Vanessa letting her loved ones thinking she'd died---if her father Henry had still been alive. She never would've been able to do that to him. And it does chafe that she's letting Bill believe it, when her mantra had been all about protecting him since the day he was born. I honestly don't recall what I thought about it at the time. But now I'm thrilled she's free of Matt at least. LOL.
    • I had no idea Peter Reckell was 70. He doesn’t look or feel it and I guess I thought Bo and Hope were closer in age than 9 years. Wow even the new writers had to have Jack praise Leo. Melissa Reeves continues to slip back in effortlessly as Jennifer. I like Ari and Holly being old friends. Holly learning about John’s death reminded me of how John used to call her Nikki if my memory is serving me right. Doug who happily sleeps in high school Holly’s room shirtless and in his underwear is now asking about birth years. How old is he anyway?    The Cat and Chad romance is insulting. 
    • Her husband is Marty Levy. Chocolate Fortunes (her company) was started in 1987.  So that explains the mystery of 'Whatever happened to Pam Peters?' She had been running a successful business for decades.
    • KMH's Emily was a harbinger for the lack of dignity many characters would face in the last decade of ATWT. On paper, many of the stories given to Melanie Smith's Emily could have been extremely sleazy, but she was treated with respect and understanding in the writing. By 1996 the show went from often not knowing how to write for KMH's Emily to giving her outright reprehensible material. There were breaks from this treatment, but not enough, with even those breaks often being poorly written or just used to make her look even worse (like her grotesque rape story turning into her using her rape to destroy Margo's marriage).  By the last years I don't even know what the hell they were doing. Wasn't there some kind of mother-daughter whoring story with Emily and Alison? Wasn't Emily getting beaten up by johns? Whenever I think of how they wrote for KMH's Emily I'm reminded of Pauline Kael's quote about Ann-Margaret's '60s movie persona - calling her "dirty" and saying the people who made the movies "knew what men wanted to do to her."  Even as much as ATWT started hiring softcore actors in the mid/late '90s, the Emily treatment was on a whole other level. I have never known what audience they thought they were going to be attracting.
    • At this point the options are 1. Leslie is going to be caught out, arrested and jailed. Hit and run, blackmail etc. 2. She gets off due to lack of evidence. Second option keeps her on the show but how are they going to keep her a viable character? No one should want to have anything to do with her. If they keep her around, won't other characters come off looking stupid for putting up with her? I'm interested to see where they go with this character/story and hope not to be disappointed.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy