Jump to content

November 1-5, 2010


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Demos are HUGELY important. But I always feel this notion that "ALL that matters whatsoever is the 18-49 demo" has been tossed around among fans so much that everyone takes it as one of the Ten Commandments. Is it really, are we certain, ALL that matters?!? (I'm sure I sound defensive, but it's one of those things I've never seen officially stated--just hearsay)

Exactly. that's why I'm not convinced it's the be all and end all of what's what.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 110
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

The tone of AMC has been slowly eroded since the mid-late 90s (some might argue earlier, but I wouldn't). What set it apart from, say the P&G soaps or Y&R in the old days was both that it always focused on young love (back when this wasn't a focus on all the shows), and that it had a lot of comedy--sometimes quite broad in the case of over the top Dickensian characters (some might argue caricature). Plus of course the social storylines. It was a mix that some didn't like (some soap books in the 70s have said it's liek watching three different shows in one, with each scene a different tone--I don't agree, I think they managed to make the tone fit, but). But it brought in a lot of new soap viewers--I think it's huge rise in the 70s was due to at least as many viewers who never watched soaps before (notably college students and men--it was the top daytime program for men for much of that time) as it did existing soap viewers.

Agnes also had a knack for writing more down to earth and relatable characters. Anyway a lot of that is missing, or at least is in lower quantities now (though as a fan hanging on, I do see elements of the old AMC back, and still have some fondness for the current regime compared to the very un AMC tone of Pratt's, etc). but we don't really have any great comic characters, or broad older characters, too many people now are independantly wealthy, loss of the sense of community (many fans in the 70s marveled that even compared to other soaps, Pine Valley really felt like an identifiable place--that's long gone), etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Give the tons of posts here about the overall numbers, it is clear that everyone does not believe that the 18 to 49 women demo is all that matters. In fact, most of them don't which is why most of the debates about the ratings are positively inane.

Also, the importance of the 18 to 49 women demo to advertisers of soaps and a multitude of shows have been stated in many articles in tv mags and interviews with network executives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sounds like AMC was a great show. Every soap used to maintain some unique feel, tone, quality and, aside from B&B, these elements seem now to be gone. Each soap brand, like the line up of 2011 autos, looks so similiar and homogenized. Even Y&R has lost the sexy mood lighting and in favor of brass yellow tones. My only real contact with AMC was during the Pratt period and I did like the look and unusual filming style--seemed to me like scenes were shot from above in an amphitheater. I only watched the Trans story but, overall, liked the show. Have no idea why Frons chose DK aside from the fact that GL was very much a community show and, even with handheld cam, Springfield felt real. I'm probably one of the few posters who saw potential in this production model.I knew a kid who worked on the GL and the entire show was staffed by recent college grads--cheap labor. My main issues were the cheap looking white trash houses used along with the semi-contrey/folk music.

OLTL is the only ABC show that seems to focus on community. RC OLTL reminds me of late Marland ATWT with his parties, use of Vikky as pillar of the community, the strong family connections and over-sized cast. I'm a bitter ATWT fan but can objectivly say that OLTL is the best soap currently on air.

As for demos, NBC is trying to sell the 54-62 demo and this was noted in Monday's Nelson TVGUIDE.ca article. This would mean a lot to Days, as well as other soaps. It is too bad no one considered this back when the PGP shows were still on air.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They pulled TC and MW because they are now under new contracts. I just don't understand why the site is even up. It is as if TPTB at TeleNext are still shopping the brand and it makes me wonder if SD isn't going to come out with one final 'The Man From Oakdale' type book. I'd think they would have timed it for the holiday season, though.

Those cheap books would be a great way for dead soaps to live on. With the right writer, they could develop a real cult following along the lines of Harlequin Romance novels but with a slightly wider appeal. PGP could even make mention of their various products in the book from Tide to Pantene by working these items into the text. A 'Soap Classics' line of serial novels including ATWT, GL, AW and, maybe EON would be rather cool. They would be like Harry Potter for the Sr. demo ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

How can OLTL still be under-budget with such a HUGE cast? I know they don't pay top dollar, TC said she had to take a pay cut when she joined; however, the cost of so many actors plus the addition of a new associate head writer must add up. I've been hearing OLTL is under-budget for years now but is this still the case after the AMC move to LA? There is no way OLTL is under budget ever quarter. I'm suprised Frons has not cut deeper to a Days production model costing 150,000 per show or drop even lower like ATWT. Days costs less but gets better demos and ATWT ranked pretty close to OLTL so I'm suprised ABC has been willing to spend so much.

SoapNet profit must help the entire ABC line up. We all are so focused on the weekly daytime ratings but ABC has a second revenue stream with these shows--I'd love to see the total viewership for OLTL Daytime+Online+SoapNet. That total must be a lot higher than 2.4 million. I expect serious budget cuts for all ABC soaps once SoapNet dies unless Frons has some plan to get these shows onto Lifetime which would be really smart. I wonder if Sony will try a Y&R replay on another cable channel such as Hallmark, OWN or even BET.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sometime back one of the AMC actors(I think it was Jacob Young) was encouraging fans to watch the show and watch it on ABC because the viewing on Soapnet was not really a factor. I am going to guess based on this and the fact that Soapnet is changing formats in 2012 tells me the amount of $$$ generated is probably minimal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

SoapNet makes a profit; however, the Disney brand is on fire and they will make an even larger profit with Disney Jr. Disney is focusing on a brand with larger growth potential, trying to loose the image as a steady blue chip stock. Also, there are many rumors that Disney wants to sell ABC, which it considers a failure much like Viacom did with CBS, and the Disney Jr. switch would be a good way to retain the cable outlet.

The line up makes money and could easily end up on another cable channel that pulls older demos and is satisfied with slower growth. One of the Lifetime Channels would be a perfect fit and, since they are co-owned by Hearst, would not really effect the Disney bottom line even after a sale. Neither company is dumping a lot of money into these networks and the soaps are still 'new' programming at low cost. If ABC gets sold/spun off, the future of these soaps is anyone's guess.

I'd still love to see the total live+online+SoapNet ratings for GH, OLTL, and AMC if anyone has them. I know both Y&R and Days get a huge number of online hits. Even though no one makes money online, 14 million hits does suggest that the genre is far from dead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Where did you read this? Just a few years ago Frons was complaining that the ratings were so low that Nielsen couldn't measure them. I know that ratings for AMC, GH, and OLTL have gotten better, but I think that's relative to what they were, but not in the realm of actually making Disney money.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I feel like the lawsuit storyline was resolved quickly because the show didn’t want to spring for more sets.
    • It's been a while, but we have seen the foyer to Bill and Hayley's house as well as the exterior entrance to their house. The foyer was first seen in the premiere episode when Hayley met Vanessa at the house.
    • There's still a year or two before Larkin arrives. Joel is there already. EON does noticeably youthify, although I think they carry it off. Admittedly I haven't seen most of the Jody stories, which from what people here have said aren't great.
    • I don't mind the actor who plays Brian. He's fine. The problem for me is that Paige seems so wishy wishy. She doesn't seem to have much of a personality at this point so I don't see why Brian would be so besotted with her. She just lurches from one trauma to the next. Granted, it's only been a month, but she's not as vibrant as April or even Deborah who has had minimal screen time by this point.  I do worry about the influence of GH on the show since I'm in fall of 1979 and characters have conversations and there's not the drive to "youthify" the show. However, I think Marceau (sp?) is gone. He was given a rather tame sendoff. How long was the actor on the show? I hope this is not a sign of things to come. I worry the show is setting up a murder mystery around one of my favorite characters and I will be mightily annoyed. I also noticed in recent Search for Tomorrow episodes uploaded to YT that the actors playing Logan and Eliot showed up. I don't watch the show but they were in the screencaps. When does Larkin Malloy show up or has he already left? Joel Crothers hasn't shown up either unless I've blinked and missed him.
    • Dr Linden. She treated Vanessa's drug addiction (although Vanessa seemed to forget that by Henry's suicide attempt) , and she's mentioned during Reva's PPD. Although I can't recall if she's actually shown right off the top of my head. She probably was temporarily shelved when Sonni was a therapist (between her crazy times) And I think Billy sees her after he falls off the wagon after Reva's death.
    • Kinda agree. I have some issues with the sets. Nicole's living room is bland-looks like a display home. Bill and Hayley's is too small and basically hideous. And neither of them have a front door/entrance or staircase. People just appear from the corridor. Those green accents  at Uptown are way too much. Also,Naomi and Vanessa not having an office or a home .
    • Thanks @Paul Raven  That Grainger story always reads like hog-wild melodrama, not very similar to the more subtle stories for Rita in her last few years. I wonder how Lenore played the material.
    • More from 1976 Lynn, apparently making every effort to overcome her alcoholism, accepts a baby-sitting job. However, when the baby starts crying, Lynn begins to get nervous and takes one drink, then another. By the time Bruce and Van arrive home, Lynn is on the floor, ineffectually trying to find the doctor’s number, sure the baby is ill. When the mother arrives; she vows to let everyone know what goes on in the mayor’s house.Bruce insists that Lynn has to go, but Van, learning that Lynn can’t remember drinking the cooking sherry, calls Joe to report Lynn’s blackouts. Joe wants her institutionalized but gives in to Van’ s pleas that Lynn needs loving attention. Eddie has sent some of Felicia’s work to a New |York gallery owner and reports to Charles that Lisa Cooper wants to exhibit Felicia’s work. Charles refuses to tell her this and later admits he feels he has “cowed”her attention because of his being confined to a wheelchair. What Charles doesn’t say is: that he’s plagued with fears she’ll leave him for another man. Felicia is exuberant as she starts painting again. She tells Charles how she feels about it, but, jealous of anyone or anything that takes attention from him, Charles tries to undermine her confidence. Eddie finally professes his love for her. He will be happy to step forward if she will only let Be and admit that they belong together. Charles tries to stop Felicia’s ‘trip to New York by making her doubt her own work, and when that fails, he finds business reasons at his bookshop to keep Di, his ex-wife, who is running it for him, from accompanying her. Felicia finally decides it’s not going to work and tells Eddie they might as well call it off. Instead, he arranges for Lisa Cooper to come to Rosehill. Charles is rude and insulting to Lisa when she arrives at the house to view Felicia’s work, and his derogatory remarks about shady gallery dealings prompt Lisa to tell Eddie that living in such an atmosphere could permanently stunt an artist’s development; if Felicia is subjected to this indefinitely, it’s not even worth Lisa’s while to take her on as a client. Felicia finally decides she can’t be torn apart any longer and must accede to Charles’s demands. She tells Eddie her career is over and she won’t paint any more, breaks down in his arms, crying bitterly, then pulls away, unwilling to acknowledge that her feelings for him are deeper than she dare face. Charles is delighted when she prepares to dispose of her art supplies, insisting everything will be fine once she has accepted that this part of her life is over. But she cannot do it. She promises him that he can set the limits and terms, but she must paint. Arlene discovers that her mother is planning to avoid the surgery she needs, and the accompanying medical bills, by leaving Rosehill and moving in with her sister Dorothy out west. Arlene manages to prevent this by calling her aunt and telling her the truth about Carrie’s condition. Dr. Tom Crawford has been footing the costs of Carrie’s presurgery tests, but Arlene knows that Carrie won’t like this. So she tells Carrie that David Hart, the son of Meg’s late husband, the former mayor, has heard about their plight and forwarded the money as a gesture of friendship, to be repaid when possible. To convince Carrie that she does indeed have the money, Arlene asks Ray to just lend it to her for a few hours, so she can convince Carrie and then immediately return it. Ray instructs her to get dressed for a night on the town and takes her, out implying that the money will be waiting at the end of the evening. When Ian Russell happens to join them, Arlene doesn’t suspect anything is afoot, but when e Ray suddenly leaves, she becomes furious, realizing what he’s done. But she finds Mr: Russell a distinguished and cultured man, and decides there’s no harm in having a drink. After cocktails and stimulating conversation, Ian suggests that they go to his place, and Arlene agrees. But when they get there, Ian matter of factly suggests that they skip the preliminaries and get on with it. Ian is embarrassed and annoyed to discover that Arlene is not a professional call girl and that Ray didn’t explain to her the purpose of their |meeting. He is apologetic and solicitous, until Arlene, explaining why Ray felt he could pull this on her, mentions her sick mother in need of an operation. Ian starts to laugh at this overworked standard line, and a livid Arlene storms out of his apartment. Thinking it over, Ian decides he’s more intrigued with Arlene than he is annoyed at Ray, and calls Ray for her telephone number. But Arlene is not delighted to hear from him, and he has to use a good deal of soothing charm before she agrees to have dinner with him at one of the better local restaurants.During dinner Ian again apologizes for his mistake, and he gives Arlene a diamond pendant as a token of his gratitude for her forgiving him. Ray arrives to interrupt an otherwise enjoyable evening with a business matter, and quietly reminds Arlene that Ian is his customer and she’s not to cut herself in with him. At home, Arlene examines the pendant and is convinced that it’s genuine. She hides it in her dresser drawer, unable to bring herself to show it to her mother.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy