Jump to content

2010 Midterm Elections Thread


Max

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Quartermainefan, you certainly won't get an argument from me regarding how wrong it is for the religious right to demand that all Republican candidates cater to their agenda. Furthermore, it is divisive how many Republicans tell people in liberal cities that they are not true Americans. However, in order to be fair, I should remind you that it was also reprehensible for Obama (back during the 2008 campaign) to categorize those living in small town America as bitter people who cling to their guns and religion.

There's also one last point I'd like to make about the Rev. Wright controversy; the point being that it's not exactly comparable to a Republican sharing a stage with Falwell or Robertson. The reason why Obama's association with Wright is far more disconcerting is because he attended Wright's church for 20 years. (I also believe that Wright married him and baptized his children.) By contrast, if a Republican shares the stage with some far-right minister, all he is doing is pickup up an endorsement (which is something that I nevertheless still condemn). (Yet, it by no means implies that the Republican candidate attended that crazy minister's church.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

So the big conservative power broker DeMint still wants to fire gay teachers and "sexually active" unwed women.

http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/10/demint_sexually_active_unmarried_women_and_gay_teachers_should_be_barred_from_classrooms.php?ref=fpi

For all the talk of it being about fiscal issues, this type of thing is still right around the corner. A group of people who stigmatize gays and any woman who does not know her place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

who cares if he attended his church though? Why is that more disconcerting than a politician like McCain sacrificing every principle he has to appease Falwell and get his endorsement and then choosing some psychopath fundie lunatic to be his VP? More disconcerting to who, republicans who will hate Obama no matter what?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

Quartermainefan, common sense would tell us that if Obama objected to the crazy things that Wright said, then Obama would have left Wright's church long ago; the fact that he chose to attend Wright's church for 20 years (and have him baptize his children) leads a reasonable person to conclude that Obama likely shares Wright's crazy views. Thus, that is why so many people care about this issue. If you still fail to see why this is such a big deal, Quartermainefan, then it is pointless to continue on with this particular discussion.

Getting back to the topic of the midterm elections, it looks like things have gotten even worse for the Democrats: The West Virginia U.S. Senate race was supposed to be an easy win for the Democratic candidate, popular governor Joe Manchin. However, because of the terrible economy and Obama's high disapproval in that state, many polls are now showing that Republican John Raese will be the winner on November 2.

West Virginia, of course, is not the only Senate seat that Republicans will pick-up from the Democrats, as other likely GOP gains include Arkansas, Indiana, Nevada, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, Washington, and Wisconsin. If the Republicans pick up all 8 of these seats (which the polls show they will) and hold on to all their current seats (as expected), this will give the GOP exactly 49 senators. Hence, what we are left with are four Senate races whose outcome I can't yet predict: California, Colorado, Connecticut, and Illinois. Should Republicans win two out of those four very close races, they will become the majority party in the Senate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Right now Nevada is tied and Washington seems to be tilting in Patty Murray's direction, as she has led in most polls recently. Connecticut also seems to be with the Democrats, unless something big changes.

I think West Virginia could go either way but this type of thing is sinking Raese.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1010/43474.html

http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=news-000003752504

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1010/43363.html

I have to wonder if there is a big movement out there among voters to abolish the minimum wage. Rarely have I seen an election year where major Republican candidates call for it. Beyond Raese, this controversy also tripped up the CT race.

I also wonder why people are throwing their money at Christine O'Donnell when she has no chance of winning.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1010/43683.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Democrats are screwed this is why Obama has been stumping hard to get the woman and teen vote because he knows without them they don't stand a chance. Unfortunately women and teens came out in droves in '08 under the promise of change and two years later they're left scratching their heads. I don't think many of them will vote and if they do they'll vote Republican. Some might even vote for the Tea Party because they're the "it" party right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the Tea Party has kind of shot itself in the foot with a lot of the candidates they've chosen. They'll still do well but it isn't where it was earlier this after with Scott Brown.

My guess is that young voters are more likely to stay home than vote Republican.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What's scary is just how deranged and lunatic the republicans have become. Where once racism or perhaps allegations of witchcraft would have spelled the end of your career, these days republicans talk about armed revolution if the vote doesn't go their way, doing away with the public school system, ties to white supremacists, being a landlord to gay bars even as you attack gays, racist cartoon fliers, opposition to the landmark civil rights act..none of it matters to republicans anymore. As long as they tell themselves these people are the real Americans who genuflect to Palin and Beck, it is all good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

For many months in the Florida Senate race, Republican Marco Rubio has held a commanding lead over Independent Charlie Crist and Democrat Kendrick Meek. Knowing that this race was a lost cause with the anti-Rubio vote split between the two other candidates, the Democratic power brokers--including Bill Clinton--recently asked Meek (who has been running in third place) to drop out of the race and endorse Crist. An hour ago, however, Meek called a press conference and made the surprise announcement that he will remain in the race.

Of course, I commend Meek for not caving into the pressure put on him by the sleazy Democratic power brokers. The Democrats (who claim to be the party that "cares" about black people) ought to be ashmed of themselves for asking their African-American nominee (Meek) to step aside for a white man (Crist). (If the Republicans ever tried something similar, they would no doubt be immediately accused of racism by the left.) Furthermore, I find it especially disgusting and cowardly that Bill Clinton would ever have the nerve to pressue somebody else to quit; after all, this is the man who refused to resign the presidency (when he should have for the good of the country) after he committed perjury and obstructed justice. ("Monicagate" was not merely just a "private" matter of sex as the Clinton and the Democrats tried to spin it. As I just said, it was a matter of perjury and obstruction of justice, and Clinton should have resigned immediately.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Some think that Meek is staying in because that helps downticket Democrats who won't want to choose between two Republicans (which is what Crist is, party label or not). Others say he's just selfish. I don't know. I think Crist would lose no matter what -- it just didn't work out.

It looks like Lisa Murkwoski is the reverse and will manage to pull out her Senate seat, although that's down to Joe Miller having a long public meltdown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Brooke did ads before ATWT too. That probably helped get her the job. After ATWT she seemed to branch more into hosting, along with ads.  I think I saw Kelley in an ad or two, but you're right she wasn't on as much. 
    •   Thanks for sharing these. I wonder if Charles might have been in the running for Adam. I know Preacher was a bit of a bad boy at times on EON, but Neal seemed to be a step down, and Robert Lupone had played a similar part on AMC. Given the huge cast turnover at this point I wonder who thought they had been there long enough to go.  Laura Malone/Chris Rich would get a remote within the next year. 
    • Interesting.  It seems to allude to that statement that Warren Burton made around that time about some AW actors getting special treatment.  I wonder who was resentful about not getting to go. 
    • Good morning, boys!  I figured that it was time that our Gio was introduced into the hotness thread

      Please register in order to view this content

      @ranger1rg I even included a close up of his face for ya!
    • Under all of Madonna's social media today there is this wave of negative, toxic, absurd comments by Lady Gaga fans telling her how Gaga surpassed her in concert in Copacabana. I mean... Who the hell cares? Why are these fan communities so freaking toxic??? I'm sure Madonna doesn't care... But still. Have some respect for M. Leave her social media alone. Go cheer Gaga and be happy. Why come and spew hate on M??? Crazy world.
    • FYI, again, Ruth/Letitia is not in either of these 2 episodes. So that concludes the 4 episodes I had from Nov. 1983. I don't have the October episodes.
    • Eddie has begun uploading the 1990 episodes. I'm so happy about that. I was mindfully taking a break till there's plenty of episodes I can binge watch when I feel like it. Now that 1989 is complete... I can't wait to press play on February 1989 and resume where I left off.
    • Please register in order to view this content

      Me when someone asks me to be proper and demure. 
    • This is just a guess but I feel like the fact that they keep mentioning her dead husband is for a reason. We know Martin has a secret that likely involved someone dying. Martin's victim could be Alan which Leslie/Dana either knows about or finds out and she uses that to blackmail the family into letting her crimes slide.  
    • Just thinking how the Ruth/Leticia guest spot really cemented how Days had changed. Stunt casting with a campy/comedy character in a 'wacky' storyline was something that a few years previously would have been completely out of place on Days (and most other soaps for that matter).
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy