Voice in the wilderness here...but why do actresses feel the need to strip off and present themselves as(airbrushed) sex objects for men to lust after?

It's always presented as them being sexually liberated and in touch with their femininity etc but it all boils down to the same thing-their worth is based on their bodies.

I thought Jones was a bit classier than that.

but why do actresses feel the need to strip off and present themselves as(airbrushed) sex objects for men to lust after?

I see nothing wrong with that.

Keep the clothes on honey!

You're revealing a mystery no one wanted to solve!

I see nothing wrong with that.

Of course not! I mean, you do love Y&R and that's full of objectifying misogyny.

Voice in the wilderness here...but why do actresses feel the need to strip off and present themselves as(airbrushed) sex objects for men to lust after?

Ego. Well, at least that's why men do it. It's less about pleasing others as it is about pleasing one's self by being slobbered over, adored.

Voice in the wilderness here...but why do actresses feel the need to strip off and present themselves as(airbrushed) sex objects for men to lust after?

That's the way the industry works. It sucks and should only be done if that's what the person wants, but that's how it's always been. I guess at least it's now slightly more equal on the objectification front.