AMC: Thursday, April 1, 2010

[R Sinclair]

Maybe I'm from another planet. I just thought Liza meant that because Krustal's living with Tad, raising kids with Tad and being Tad's confidante, it leaves very little room for Liza to have an intimate relationship -- when Krustal has the monopoly of intimate connections. It doesn't make her look "foolish." It's a valid complaint. How the hell do you have an intimate relationship with a man if another woman is living with him, raising kids with him and being the first one he goes to with personal information over you?

The "fool" in this situation is that skanky whore Krustal who's pretending she doesn't have the brain cells to fathom why her position in Tad's life kinda makes it hard for another woman to come in.

Krustal should've moved out ages ago.

[Cheap21]

well you put it out there much better than Liza did, if that was her intent. Whatever the reason, it is what it is. Krystal is raising kids with the guy and Liza knew what she was walking into. Krystal didnt just happen to move into that house after Liza started dating him again. Forget about her for a minute. Do you really think Liza would have had a better outcome with Tad if Krystal wasnt in the picture? She seems like more of a non-issue and they would have imploded with or without Krystal having any place in Tad's life

[Jonathan]

I'm not liking Tad and this new job. Does he even need to work? He's loaded from Orsini. And I can understand trying to find something to occupy his time, but really, does he have to work for Ryan? I hope this new job leads to some interesting storylines for him down the road.

And if any set needed an upgrade in conjunction with the LA move, it's the casino set! That wallpaper is the same wallpaper Amy Tyler had in her home in the 70s!