Jump to content

October 19-23, 2009


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Among the people I know--mainly around my age (23-33) there definetly is still a stigma, even among my gay friends. Sure after a few drinks other peopel will admit thatthey loved Days in high school or whatever, but it's not something most people I know admit easily. And actually with many of them there's prob more acceptance that one watches porn lol

And SNL already had two soap parodies this year alone (yes with organ music). I dunno, I disagree with you Carl

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

SNL is a badly dated show -- that they use organ music says it all. They also think a white man in blackface is great comedy. If not for Tina Fey and her Sarah Palin impression, that would be the same "Is that still on?" that soaps get.

I don't mean to generalize, I just think soaps are past the point where it's some big shame; they're not important enough now to warrant shame.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

quite a few of them.

at first they wont admit it but when me and a friend get going they always chime in. lol.

some have always watched or started in collegte or summers or whatever, but like my best friends all watch days when they can so they know what the hell im talking about.

really? i never have been.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's not the point.

They don't run ads to "sell" to us--not in an immediate time frame.

They run ads to shape brand recognition and develop brand perceptions.

People my age don't buy Tide because of ads. We buy Tide because of many years of experience with the product. The young group buys Tide because mom used it, or because of coupons...or because a lifetime of ads has shaped their preferences, so when they finally buy their own Tide...all those years of commercials worked.

That's the logic. The malleability of preference...which becomes LESS malleable...is the reason for the focus on the young female demo.

There is more (and I'll be the first to admit I don't totally know the scientific basis of some of these assumptions): Older (folks outside of the demo) adults may have more disposable $$...but they're tighter with it. Retirement savings, college savings, mortgages, credit cards....and a growing understanding of all of the demands on their wallet...makes them more likely to be value shoppers. That gives ads less room to work.

The ads that are targeted at older adults, like drug ads, are more focused at shaping preference ("Ask your doctor about Viagra"), but for many of those products, they work because someone else (the insurance company) actually has to foot the bill. Even on the senior-citizens networks like GSN...when they advertise the Hoverround, it is to elders who will then ask Medicare to pay for it.

You don't advertise to midlife and older adults to SPEND money. They will...but it is the younger age group that has more malleable preferences, and is more willing to actually shell out from the credit card.

To be clear: I don't assert that all of the above is true, but it is a part of the thinking that has built this demo preference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So I've been thinking about the question of the Friday dropoff of ratings and I'm wondering, could it be DVR related?

These ratings only count live + same day viewings. Is it possible that as the week goes on the "same-day" viewings decrease because people are waiting until the weekend to watch?

Just a thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is so true my parents and older relatives have there brand and they don't falter, I do tend to purchase what I grew up on to an extent sometimes I catch a sale. It is true that the younger demo is most likely to try new brands and products faster than older ad watchers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • There's some irony in Philip being forgiven, because it forces everyone to admit that Victor was wrong to change his will.  Everyone, eventually including Xander, (I presume), seems to think it was wrong for Victor to divide his estate in Xander's favor.  I appreciated Stephanie forgiving Philip, because she's got no skin in that game.  But, Belle's line about Philip missing Xander because he misses Bo did not ring true.  I think Philip would be sad if Bo dies, but I think he's more concerned currently about Xander. I am enjoying this EJ mystery so much that I am hereby taking a vow not to read spoilers.  I am also vowing — for the last time — to stop harping on this, but: the concept of a “sepsis treatment” remains absurd. Hospitals prevent sepsis through vigilant infection control; once sepsis sets in, it causes multiple organ failures. Treatment involves supporting each failing organ individually. The notion that a single medication could magically reverse organ failure is medically laughable. However, I like the contrast of Kim going through cancer, which is incurable in their universe.  Kayla's comment on the health of both of her siblings was both heartbreaking and an interesting twist.  MBE is also totally underrated.  She is carrying the weight of so many stories.   And, I like the use of Kayla as an audience surrogate.  She's arguably the most "real" person in Salem. Kayla isn't psychic, she wasn't SORASed, she's not a billionaire, and she doesn't have a bionic eye.  So, I enjoy that we get her perspective of the nuttiness that surrounds her.
    • But why worry about something that might not happen? Right now, most things revolve around the Duprees. We have no idea if or how long that will continue. For now, it's working.
    • The Duprees not having any staff is a bugbear for me. They've included the background staff at the Country Club but no one at the Dupree home. Even just an extra bringing in a tray of food/drinks or responding to a request from Anita would suffice.
    • Shut up, Dante and Lois.  I actually don't mind this particular soap trope, but in the context of this storyline, it just feels forced and unnecessary. If anything, this Dante/Gio tension needed to begin months ago. Plus, this storyline, in general, isn't doing Lois any favors either.  Emma comforting Gio was really sweet though. It's definitely time for the two of them to have their first kiss. And, Joss playing Secret Agent Barbie will just never work.
    • Note to makeup - Smitty’s eyebrows, bad clamshell look.  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Okay I can buy that when Brook Lynn was a teen.  Now she knows the child is a boy one would think she'd be slightly suspicious.  Then again, Gio looks nothing like either of them so maybe not lol.
    • I've been behind & just got caught up & the last 3 days were amazing!
    • Yeah.  The hot, poor bad boy with a chip on his shoulder but with a heart of gold was a common soap trope in the 80s 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That's been an issue with me... the lack of a cohesive 'Have Not' crowd that has focus other than Leslie/Eva.   I would beef up Jan, Mona, Laura, Joey, and few other male characters.. and not just be out to overthrow the Duprees.. but co-existing and broadening the scope of the show since the show is called Beyond the Gates. I think the set up the show has with everything revolving around the Duprees will become predictable especially if they always win.   It would be like Victor Newman on Y & R for 40+ years.. always winning, hardly ever losing.   With MVJ/Guza.. both trained under that mindset... I fear that will happen.   I've always heard from a performer that is playing a character like Leslie/Dana that you have to find the victim/hurt beneath the surface in order to play a villain/villainess... and I think that's why I enjoy watching her.. because she brings so much more to the part than what the writers put on the page.
    • I figure that was really hard for Dom to do. I completely GET why they wrote it the way they did but I wonder if it was necessary. Meanwhile I have 2 really icky ideas in my head. Drew is going to blame Tracy KNOWING it was not her. Dante is going to blame Lulu.  After that, everyone else is going to be mad at Lois.  Tracy is going to double down on wanting to get rid of Sonny. Sonny's going to be more dug in to stay because he now has a new descendant. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy