Jump to content

October 19-23, 2009


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator

If you're going to copy/paste, please link. Thank you.

Numbers are based on Live+Same Day ratings

Ratings for the week October 19-23, 2009

(Compared to Last Week/Compared to Last Year)

Total Viewers

1. Y&R 5,054,000 (-253,000/+65,000)

2. B&B 3,241,000 (-250,000/-279,000)

3. DAYS 3,002,000 (-37,000/+346,000)

4. AMC 2,670,000 (+68,000/-73,000)

5. GH 2,565,000 (-15,000/-62,000)

6. OLTL 2,492,000 (-75,000/-147,000)

7. ATWT 2,447,000 (-103,000/-296,000)

HH

1. Y&R 3.7/13 (-.1/same)

2. B&B 2.4/8 (-.1/-.3)

3. DAYS 2.2/7 (same/+.2)

4. AMC 2.0/7 (same/-.1)

5. GH 1.9/6 (same/-.2)

5. OLTL 1.9/6 (same/-.1)

7. ATWT 1.8/6 (same/-.3)

Women 18-49 Viewers

1. Y&R 1,140,000 (-80,000/+89,000)

2. DAYS 867,000 (-44,000/-66,000)

3. GH 843,000 (-47,000/-19,000)

4, AMC 735,000 (+14,000/-131,000)

5. OLTL 710,000 (-64,000/-108,000)

6. B&B 707,000 (-41,000/-67,000)

7. ATWT 592,000 (+22,000/-120,000)

Women 18-49 Rating

1. Y&R 1.7/11 (-.1/+.1)

2. DAYS 1.3/8 (-.1/-.1)

2. GH 1.3/8 (same/same)

4. B&B 1.1/7 (same/-.1)

4. AMC 1.1/7 (same/-.2)

4. OLTL 1.1/7 (-.1/-.1)

7. ATWT 0.9/6 (same/-.2)

Girls 12-17 Viewers

1. OLTL 44,000 (-6,000/+19,000)

2. GH 43,000 (+3,000/+31,000)

3. Y&R 38,000 (same/-4,000)

4. DAYS 27,000 (-6,000/-23,000)

5. AMC 25,000 (+5,000/-4,000)

6. B&B 18,000 (+1,000/-8,000)

7. ATWT 17,000 (-4,000/-19,000)

Women 18-34 Rating

1. Y&R 1.2/8 (same/+.3)

2. DAYS 1.0/6 (+.1/-.2)

3. AMC 0.9/6 (same/same)

3. GH 0.9/6 (same/same)

5. OLTL 0.8/5 (-.1/-.1)

6. B&B 0.7/5 (same/+.1)

7. ATWT 0.6/4 (+.1/+.1)

Men 18+ Viewers

1. Y&R 1,211,000 (-69,000/-46,000)

2. B&B 701,000 (-103,000/-36,000)

3. DAYS 605,000 (-27,000/+72,000)

4. AMC 545,000 (+52,000/+34,000)

5. ATWT 524,000 (-23,000/-20,000)

6. GH 482,000 (+4,000/+47,000)

7. OLTL 467,000 (+11,000/+6,000)

-------------------------------------

Day-To-Day Ratings - HH/Total Viewers

AMC

Monday: 2.0/2,751,000

Tuesday: 2.0/2,690,000

Wednesday: 2.0/2,598,000

Thursday: 2.0/2,613,000

Friday: 2.0/2,699,000

ATWT

Monday: 1.7/2,298,000

Tuesday: 1.8/2,459,000

Wednesday: 1.7/2,287,000

Thursday: 1.8/2,474,000

Friday: 1.9/2,717,000

B&B

Monday: 2.4/3,283,000

Tuesday: 2.5/3,280,000

Wednesday: 2.2/2,962,000

Thursday: 2.5/3,378,000

Friday: 2.3/3,301,000

DAYS

Monday: 2,4/3,257,000

Tuesday: 2.3/3,076,000

Wednesday: 2.1/2,897,000

Thursday: 2.0/2,706,000

Friday: 2.3/3,073,000

GH

Monday: 1.9/2,727,000

Tuesday: 2.0/2,628,000

Wednesday: 1.9/2,539,000

Thursday: 1.9/2,518,000

Friday: 1.9/2,413,000

OLTL

Monday: 2.0/2,823,000

Tuesday: 1.9/2,461,000

Wednesday: 1.9/2,385,000

Thursday: 1.8/2,340,000

Friday: 1.9/2,449,000

Y&R

Monday: 3.8/5,059,000

Tuesday: 3.7/4,922,000

Wednesday: 3.7/4,961,000

Thursday: 3.7/5,169,000

Friday: 3.6/5,169,000

----------------------

For the SEASON September 21, 2009 through October 25, 2009

HH

1. Y&R 3.8

2. B&B 2.4

3. DAYS 2.3

4. GH 2.1

5. AMC 2.0

6. OLTL 1.9

7. ATWT 1.8

Women 18-49 Rating

1. Y&R 1.8

2. DAYS 1.4

2. GH 1.4

4. OLTL 1.2

5. AMC 1.1

5. B&B 1.1

7. ATWT 0.9

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Interesting week here as the soaps are expected to take a fall from such a huge week but sweeps are coming up so there's a chance the soaps will either stay close to where their at or drop slightly in the next few weeks.

DAYS will be the one show's ratings that I really look for as its on the verge of making history and capturing that 2nd place spot from B&B for the first time in years. DAYS is the strongest soap on TV right now as its practically a brand new show with interesting new characters who are starting to landmark their own status. They've gone the right route and the right direction with the way they've written the show.

The funniest thing about DAYS right now was that this show was in danger back in '07 and was expected to be the first of the FINAL 8 soaps to be cancelled yet it might have even more life than the rest since it does well overseas and has found a rebirth. NBC's decision to renew the show will be an ownership decision this time around as Comcast might be making the decision on it. DAYS is one of the few shows on the network to have grown in recent years so its definitely a keeper unless they want their rival ABC to pick it up.

November could be a big month for DAYS as I predict a 2.4 or 2.5 on Veteran's Day or whatever other holidays they have in November.

When looking at Y&R, it seems to be a show that has proved that the audience still has range and Victor in November should be huge. I've got reason to believe that soaps have enough to live on here if given the chance.

My guilty pleasure soap right now is ATWT, I'm loving what I'm seeing but the show has gone the expected to be cancelled route unfortunately. Man I wish someone would pickup GL and ATWT and revive them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If soaps are able to hold on to most of their gains this week, I think the daytime soap industry is officially not going away anytime soon!

BlueLick, glad you are liking ATWT! No reason to treat it as a guilty pleasure, it is definitely good. I have faith that November sweeps ratings can save the show. If people watch and stop fueling the cancellation meme with "Oh, it's gonna be canceled, hopeless, last year", blah blah blah blah blah. As you pointed out, Days was in even bigger danger than GL in 2007, and now look at it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Nah...I wish it could be true, but it's not.

If they hold on to their gains for 52 weeks or something, then we can talk. But even then, long-term viability is challenged by the anemic numbers. True longevity would involve creeping the numbers back up, and that's never going to happen. The alternative would be to change the cost-model for funding and monetizing these shows...and that's not going to happen quickly enough.

But the history of daytime ratings, from the 1950s, clearly shows us that it's the longer TREND that is the killer.

Last week, I posted this GL ratings graph as a demo. GL had been at or near the bottom of the ratings pool since the early 1980s. Any 1-2 week bump up by a few ratings points (0.2 or 0.3) could not have saved a show that was on a trajectory like this:

gl_where.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Daytime is in a rough place but I'm not sure if GL's trajectory is the right starting point. That show was facing cancellation starting in 1994, at least. Besides that, CBS did not own GL, as they don't own ATWT. I think the soaps which are owned, or partly owned, by the network may stay around longer, especially if nothing else comes along which really does that much better. So far, it hasn't.

Anyway, I think the soaps will go down, although I'd like to see DAYS and ATWT and OLTL go up. OLTL is uneven (as always this year :( ) but ATWT and DAYS have gotten much stronger on an overall level, moreso than I've seen on soaps in a long time. I can almost watch the entire episodes. Of course ATWT is in the middle of a big stunt, but still, ask me how much of GH I can watch during their stunts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

MarkH, frankly your graph missses the point. Ratings going back decades are irrelevant. Your "1960s-1990s determinism" has always baffled me. As for GL being at or near the bottom since the early 80s, your own graph shows a spike in the early 90s. But again, that's irrelevant.

Graph back the last five years for a better picture of the trends in viewing NOW for daytime soaps. The picture is still grim but decades-long determinism is not a convincing argument to me. It mixes housewives entering the workforce with the rise of cable and the Internet all as if one has to do with the others.

Soaps are staying!

And you said well a couple weeks doesn't matter ... What about Days, that's been *two years* of stabilization or growth since it was in greater danger than GL in 2007! If Days can do it, other soaps can too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Just watched the episode concerning Olivia's drug use and Abby's persistence, etc. Donna Mills did stellar work in this episode, as did Tonya Crowe and Brian Austin Green (Brian).
    • But by Dinah and Hart...Hart especially looked as if he could not tie his own shoes!  Ed, Holly, Alan, Alex Henry and Vanessa among others were not able to put Roger down....Dinah???
    • The preaching seems to end before the Barnes settle in late December, 1981. The stuff that felt overly religious (the Davidsons believing a miracle will save Lori rather than a surgeon, Jeff's miraculous recovery from a beam of light) was quickly nixed because it wasn't working. The closest thing that you get to that under the Barnes is when Dennis Fraser, the drunk driver who killed Nora and Scott, turns his life over to god. The born-again redemptions out of nowhere seem to stop fairly early into the Barnes' run. I do think Miriam's transformation was much more delicately done with her turning on her bestie Nancy because Nancy was seducing Charles, Miriam's wealthy father, so Miriam offers to testify for the Davidsons in the trial against Nancy over possession of Nora's house. In turn, Nancy repays the favor by pumping an emotionally distraught Miriam with barbituates while Miriam carries on her affair with low level thug turned political aide Norm Elliott. Miriam is used by everyone into her life and finally lands herself in the hospital becasue she has become so addicted to the pills. At the hospital, it is the friendship and kindness of the Davidsons that brings Miriam to a more peaceful place. The Davidsons ability to forgive is both appealing and, at times, dramatically limiting. In this case, the Davidsons lead Miriam to her new Mama, Ione Redlon. Now, under Vinley, Miriam is determined to reconnect with her son, Frederick, and her ex-husband, Paul.   My bigger issue with the Barnes' writing is that they write the storylines with twist endings that sorta come out of nowhere. I know the resolution to the Kate Carrouthers mystery sorta plays out like that so I am curious to see how I feel about that.  The biggest change throughout the writing teams has been the view of morality. Winsor had many characters who could be viewed purely through the lens of black and white, but others explored the shades of gray (often younger people). The brief head writerless period was much better at embracing an action doesn't make a person and there characters were much more gray or at least evil at a more local level (Nancy, in this period, only flirts with her brother-in-law where as later she is actively providing pills to Miriam to keep her addicted and away from her own father). The Barnes, for the most part, seem to embrace this level of political corruption that seems to permeate throughout the show making it clear that power (as well as money) is the root of evil. Even criminal Vince Cardello is presented as less evil than Charles Carpenter, though Carpenter's murder of a resident of his complex was rewritten to relieve Carpenter of any responsibility in the matter. Vinley's work seems more into exploring the why or delving deeper in general. Babs Farley, the hooker who is looking to reclaim her life, is such an intriguing character. She is given such meaningful monologues regretting her decisions and desperately trying to keep away from the hands of her former pimp, Ron Washington, who hasn't appeared yet. Monk and Fernandez seem to be wrongly accused of Lori's attack and there seems to be hints of racism that the show is looking to address. Marianne confronts Gil about his feelings towards God in relation to their mother's death years earlier.  There does seem to be a layer of misogyny to Vinley's work, but it's early so I'll be curious to see how this plays out. There are a lot of attacks on women (Lori is nearly raped, Babs was beaten, Nancy is on the verge of being blackmailed for sex by Tab, and the Russ / Marianne / Gil scenario has hints of toxic masculinity. It's very early so it'll be neat to see if that is maintained.  Jerry TImm lasts about a year I think (March, 1982 - March, 1983). One of the episodes on TouTube has a comment suggesting that Timm was fired by CBN because he had done something in his past that came to light. It didn't seem to be clear what that was.  I like what I've seen of Timm as Gil. He has such a presence that it covers up some of his weaker acting choices. It's unfortunate that he didn't get to play as much of the Gil - Stacey - Amber triangle as his replacement does.  
    • I believe it was Mark Arnold's family that taped all the shows. It was the same with Ariane Muneker - her mother bought a video recording machine in the 1970s, at a time when that type of technology was really expensive John Wesley Shipp's parents also taped all his shows, and has a complete library of every single episode of every soap JWS has appeared on. Same for Cynthia Watros. When the Soap Actors parents pass away, and there are all these VHS tapes in dozens of boxes, it is shame to waste all that. 
    • Personally, I felt that the deletion of the original music from the girls' slumber party episode, and the axing of REM's Losing My Religion from the ep featuring Brenda and Dylan breaking up, were the most painful. The changes really damaged those episodes. I dropped the DVDs after season two, but I've been told by other viewers who kept going that tunes from all the seasons continued being replaced, and the situation only got worse as the DVD releases progressed. Yes, penny-pinching from those in charge was the principle issue, but I wonder how much better the DVDs would have sold if such poor choices had not been made in the name of cost cutting. On the other hand, when Time-Life put out the Vietnam-war era classic China Beach, they dug deep into their pockets and ended up clearing the rights to a whopping 268 (!!!) of the original tracks. This represented 96% of the total. TPTB said that when they were not given permission to use a few of the remaining pieces, they substituted different singers' versions of the exact same songs, in order to preserve the show's integrity as much as possible. The CB set was expensive as heck, to be sure, but to me it was worth it.
    • Oh I knew it was common (I did not realize Muenker's channel was gone - I'm glad I saved all those videos). I just didn't realize it was the case with the rape episode.  I never really felt like she dominated the show in her second stint either, although I can see where she probably did. I can feel it more in some of her first run, because the show was much different before she came in and suddenly a woman we'd seen for a year was [!@#$%^&*] and marrying an entire family.  In that sense Reva is more like Babe than Erica Kane. One of the more infamous AMC lines was, "Babe is love." You just know HB would have said that line about Reva at some point.
    • I disagree; if this were Chris Clenshaw, then I would be worried. But it's a new producer coming in to clearly create the canvas they want to create, and I'm okay with that. Re-introducing characters to shake things up and possibly take some other ones out of the canvas. It'll be interesting to see the finished product.
    • I am ready for our first full week in what feels like a while! They worked Sweeps month!
    • Beyond the Gates: A The Bold and the Beautiful: F Coronation Street: B Days of Our Lives: B- EastEnders: A+ Emmerdale: A- Hollyoaks: B+ General Hospital: C Neighbours: C+ The Young and the Restless: F For me, Beyond the Gates, EastEnders, and Emmerdale led the pack during Sweeps month, with Coronation Street and Days of Our Lives following. General Hospital and Neighbours sit in the middle with what I'd call a "take it or leave it" kind of Sweeps month, and the Bell soaps bombed (per usual).
    • Actors doing this is pretty common. I used to work for a company that produced a very successful sitcom back in the 70s. Actors who were guest stars on the show would ask to be provided tapes of their episodes. I assume they do it for a variety of reasons, i.e. to create a reel of their best work. I know of some soap actors who have uploaded saved work to YT. One is Ariana Muenker, who played Christine Valere on GL. She was uploading scenes from her many soap roles a few months back. Unfortunately, it looks like either she or YT took the channel down. Sharon Gabet and Mark Arnold help the EON YT channel by providing saved episodes. Along with EON eps, Arnold shared a guest stint he did on GL. Those episodes are really interesting because they involve the introduction of Nola's character, which was tied to the Roger storyline. When he came back after faking his death, he hid out at the boarding house. Nola being a snoop figured out something was fishy with him. She ended up helping the police. Very worth seeking out. I don't think anyone else has those episodes.  Makes you wonder if there's more out there than we know of because actors don't want to be bothered to run a YT channel. Can't blame them because it's a lot of trouble, but if only... I agree. While Lucci definitely used her fame from the show to build her brand and get work outside of AMC, Erica was always part of an ensemble. Yeah, she got a couple of whacky stories (like the "unabortion") but she never took over to the detriment of other actors and stories.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy