Jump to content

Should Noah and Luke be written off ATWT??


Recommended Posts

  • Members

After reading Forbes March's interview and how he said P&G is invested in Nuke.......Isn't it time to just write off Nuke? What is the point of them if they dont have a storyline?? They don't even feel like a gay couple at all.

What are your thoughts??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 26
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Since the show is probably ending in a year anyway I think they should keep them on. I still think there are stories they could give them, just slice of life stories, or stories based on their personality clashes. Luke is a core character and I think he still works within his family. I think Noah is still decent with some characters when he gets a chance.

I wouldn't mind seeing Noah go to work at WOAK and share scenes with Kim, do documentaries about social issues or something. I think that would give ATWT back some of the social consciousness they had when Marland was writing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

He also said Goutman is invested, even though P&G isn't invested. So it's a tug of war, which results in half-stories. I am still happy with them as at least supporting characters, Luke in the Holden/Lily/Damian drama for example, so I definitely don't want them written off!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

laugh.giflaugh.giflaugh.gif

I just see no point in Nuke if they arent going to be written for as a couple. At least write off Noah and put Luke back in his family orbit. Other veteran characters could be used instead of Nuke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They probably won't be used that much with or without Noah.

I wouldn't have a problem with Noah going away on trips or making movies, coming back for visits, but I would rather see them stay together since the show is ending anyway, and since it's not like the show is going to have any more romantic coupling with anyone else and Luke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well if the show is ending then TPTB should concentrate on the main core characters of the show...ie the vets. I dont see Noah as an important character of ATWT. It's like ATWT tried with a gay couple and failed badly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

My general philosophy is that if a show doesn't have the balls and/or permission to really write for gay characters and couples, they shouldn't even bother going there but since ATWT is toast within the next year anyway and Luke is a legacy character, they might as well keep them until the end if only for history's sake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wish they'd take that advice from you. I dont see Luke as a legacy character. Yes, I will remember him because he was at the end of ATWTs run. But legacy to me means Kim, Bob, Lisa, Barbara, Lily, Iva, Lucinda, Susan...not Luke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You know, I have been following the Kyle & Fish story on YT. I have to say Nuke seems extremely saccharine and unrealistic in comparison. I mean, seriously, I wish gay romance was actually that easy. I find it hard to sit through Nuke's scenes sometimes without rolling my eyes, but should they be written off? Meh...maybe they should just be written much better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Aaaah, it is not a done deal that ATWT is ending. Colleen Zenk Pinter told Lynn Herring that it bothered her that so many people were calling her thinking ATWT was cancelled too with GL, when it wasn't. Herring talked about this in an interview with Michael Fairman. Pinter didn't like that people had just given up and weren't giving ATWT a chance.

People have to tune in to November sweeps! ATWT can live if it gets good ratings for November.

The quality of the writing is there for next month (even for Nuke apparently). It's up to the viewers to follow. Save ATWT!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm loving the Kyle & Fish story more than I ever did Nuke. Nuke really sucks in comparison. The dialogue for Kyle and Fish yesterday was nicely done.

Goutman shouldnt have waited until October/Novermber to make ATWT watchable. Why did GL have to get cancelled before Goutman moved his a s s and made changes on ATWT?? It's more than likely too late for ATWT. No one is to blame for this than Goutman for keeping his goon/fool Jean Pissy as HW and not making story changes as soon as ATWT started slipping quality and ratings wise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think ATWT failed badly with Nuke. The story did, for a time, get them an increase in numbers, in press attention, and had some good moments, every now and then. They were also relatively groundbreaking -- I'm not sure if OLTL would have told the Kish story (which even now involves fairly tertiary characters who didn't have a lot of buildup together and could, with a whim from Frons, leave tomorrow without most of the canvas noticing) if not for Nuke.

I don't see Noah as important to ATWT, but then, I don't think he's being treated as important. He's Luke's boyfriend, basically. The vets would have to cut a swathe through Dusty, Paul, Meg, Janet, Teri, Parker, Liberty, NuLily, etc. before they get anywhere near the airtime they once had.

I guess I see legacy as a future character, one produced by older, longstanding characters. Like Andy. Or what Andy should have been if they hadn't driven Scott Defrietas off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I see them as both being important characters. Andy was played by a better actor, but then, he was, for the most part, in an era of ATWT which was far better written and produced.

I do hope he comes back for the end. I still miss Andy so much, and John too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • In a way, it's a shame that Lynne Adams decided to leave the show when she did, because I think Mike and Leslie were positioned very well to become GL's tentpole couple.
    • Correct. Lynne Adams (Leslie) decided she wanted to leave the show, as Leslie hadn't been given much to do since Adams returned as Leslie in 1973 (and now everyone can witness her first scene returning as Leslie in 1973 on YT - unreal) I don't think the Dobsons tried to stop that from happening, as I think they wanted Mike single again. I agree, @DeeVee - they should have let Mike and Leslie have a child together. I wonder it they thought it would be too strange to have two siblings that could also be cousins 

      Please register in order to view this content

      . As far as Ed and Holly go, at least they allowed Ed to show up at the end of TGL and take Holly on a "trip around the world". IMHO, I don't think Peter Simon had as much chemistry with Maureen Garrett as Mart Hulswit had, but I'm glad the show gave them a final scene together.
    • IF this gets a renewal I can't see LY sticking around    
    • Well, I'm glad to know Devane and I are on the same wavelength, lol.  But seriously.  I don't believe there's any other word to describe the machinations that the producers constructed in the name of keeping Greg and Paige apart.  Greg and Paige made Sam and Diane look mature by comparison! Which would have been just as well, since a character like Greg Sumner didn't really belong in the '90's, as the storyline with the task force proved only too well.  If KL had returned for another season, it would've needed a MASSIVE overhaul, including ditching Greg, Paige, Claudia and Anne.  Mack and Karen would've needed to be there for the sake of continuity; and maybe some mileage could've been gained from exploring Gary's new life as a widowed single father.  (I still would've loved to bring back Julie Harris and have Lilimae help Gary take care of the twins).  Otherwise, it would've been a new era for KL, one without The Sumner Group, or stories like Wolfbridge and Empire Valley.
    • This is "Last Call" for anyone who wants to download a copy of any of these Award show files. Daytime Emmys, Full Episodes: 1982, .. 1985, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989, .. 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995 Daytime Emmys, Extras or Partials: 1990 1998 SOD Awards
    • What he said. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Didn't she know when she involved him in her scheme, before the character was introduced? I thought she tracked down Janice's son and poisoned his mind against Rachel in order to get him on board.  It's a bit confusing because in the summer of 1988 we get a lot of Drew Marsten (whom I had forgotten was Nicole's ex) and mentions of a mysterious Countess and also Reginald working to undermine Cory. Drew disappears around the same time Evan arrives, and gradually we get the reveals that he is in cahoots with Iris, Janice's son, etc. 
    • I apply totally different standards. For Felicia & anyone else in Bay City it's reel as opposed to out here in the universe where it's real.  
    • And that is why western civilization is screwed up with organized religion. but thats for another board. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy