Jump to content

Guiding Light Discussion Thread


Paul Raven

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I do believe one of the ITL's was what Jordan submitted the year he won. And I agree, some worked, others not so much. I think it might've been more practical to do one really good one a month, rather than 1 good, 2 mediocre and one stinky one a month. 

It was only like a line, and a curious shout-out, given how long it had been since Sonni had been on the show. Maeve's only in it briefly, but it's fun for me because she's in a fur coat, and older viewers might've gotten the sly reference to Vanessa's early man-chasing days.

Edited by P.J.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 17.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

It's hard for me to judge that period because we only have two episodes - I do think Charlotte's "suicide" aftermath episode is decent. The other is not great, in part because of everyone narrating, as you mention. Based on all the panning of Cenedella from Lemay's book (admittedly not the best source), and the issues with Lipton as a writer, some of the problems don't surprise me. 

I don't have a problem believing these three women would want Joe. One was crazy, one was a desperate schemer, and Sara didn't exactly have great taste in men (Joe was one of her better choices). I think Call was able to show his quiet charisma on OLTL. He's not playing much of a character here.

The parts about Leslie's mother are clunkier to me.

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not sure if you're referring to Wheeler having plans for this after the cancellation, or before the cancellation.  But I do have some intel about something along those lines she wanted to do before the show was cancelled.  

After Wheeler had been given permission to go with the new production model, and she was ready to roll with it full time (the show had actually been experimenting with hand-held shaky cameras and more outdoor shooting, etc, for several months before they went "full steam ahead") -- so when the decision was made, Wheeler made a big deal about rebooting the show with sort of a "premiere" episode.  Lots of fans probably remember that episode and how it was promoted on CBS.  Wheeler's original intent was to re-number GL's episodes -- and begin the show all over again by numbering that new production model "premiere" as Guiding Light episode # 1.  I never heard or read that she literally wanted to rename the show, The New Guiding Light, but perhaps that was in her plan also.   Anyway, regarding the re-numbering  of episodes -- ultimately P&G refused to allow Wheeler to re-number the episodes, so she was unable to make it episode #1, as she had wanted.   

I'm not sure I've really answered your question, but I do remember that Wheeler was keen on completely rebooting the show, and essentially starting from scratch.  And she would have done so, had P&G not stopped her.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But, Jonathan's story is basic soap trope. He was the previously unknown child who has been treated miserably & he's come to get his revenge on the people who abandoned him to such a monster. This tale has been told so many times. And, Tom Pelphrey was such a find.

Now, Sebastian is a totally different thing. Wheeler's big mistake with Sebastian was waiting & hoping Peter Simon would change his mind. He wasn't going to & she needed to recast & keep moving.  When Sebastian had Holly in a cell & tried to make her kiss him I knew we were in a heap of trouble.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I would have been curious to see what would happen - probably nothing great, to be honest, but seeing her try a brand new show, maybe even have the actors as new characters, could have been interesting. 

The idea of going back to episode #1 is something comics like to do. I'm not a fan. Is Wheeler a big comic fan?

Russell T. Davies also did that with Doctor Who last year, which did nothing for the show whatsoever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Re: 1973 GL. I know it was the 70's, but that yellow painted woodwork in Mike & Leslie's house was outrageous and the plaid couch. Poor Leslie looked like she was being styled like Pat Nixon. Several posters on youtube were woofing at Mike in his tight yellow polo shirt and referring to him as a Daddy. Don Stewart was being propped as GL heartthrob during that era. I read Stewart was very difficult and a bit conceited. The scenes with Kit were a bit camp especially when she is sneaking around outside Charlotte's and runs off.

The second episode with all the technical issues was a bit hard to get through. I found Lynne Adams as Leslie flat compared to Rodell's version. I read she was fired to make way for Adams return.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I do not believe Wheeler's intent was ever to have the actors playing new characters.  She just wanted to reboot the show with existing characters/actors, and sort of pretend it was an entirely new Guiding Light.   I think that was an attempt to get media attention (which partially did work) and attract new viewers.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, regardless of who's idea the new production model was, ultimately P&G had to agree to it.  So I could have began, After P&G had agreed to the new production model... 

And to be clear, I did not intend to sound particularly critical of Ellen Wheeler.  I have always been empathetic with the very difficult position she was in.  I was really just trying to share what I recall about her desire to re-number GL's episodes and more-or-less reboot the show -- in reference to another poster's question.   But Wheeler did the best she could in an impossible situation.  And GL was used as a guinea pig with the new production model.  Bad for GL, but ultimately GL's failure prevented other soaps from following the same path, which I'm sure other soaps would have eventually done.  

Edited by Mona Kane Croft
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • We get it, you don't like this show or the actors. You've said that over and over again, Mr. Vanguard America/VDARE.
    • Lol at the WSB hot guy asking Joss if she was okay with betraying her friends.  Of course she is! Chase coming in hot at Dante was a choice. It's also quite hypocritical since Chase is lying to him about Dante's own child and making Lulu the bad guy.  Talk to the grown woman yourself Chase.  Don't make Dante do it. Lulu and Laura had some great scenes. The Rocco/Danny party is obvious an anvil for something happening and probably the Gio secret coming out. The Willow/Drew/Nina scenes were kind of anti-climatic?  I get why Nina chose this path as the way to get rid of Drew, but will anyone ever find out Drew was sleeping with Nina?  
    • I was reading the NYT article on Roku's purchase of FrndlyTV. As anyone who has read my posting knows, I think re-airing old soaps is an imprudent idea. However, I will admit that if large media companies are looking for more streaming content.  And, if advances in AI continue to make the digitization process faster and cheaper.  Those of you who want the owners of the IP to release anything in their vaults may have reason to be hopeful.  Because the makers of TV's want to get into streaming in order to encourage young people to get back in the habit of updating their TV devices every few years.  And, Roku's plan is market exclusive content, that you have to buy a Roku device to view.  And you-know-who has a ton of content to sell.
    • This was  the messiest hour of television I’ve seen since Kenya Moore asked “who is this hoe?”
    • details of the current Health Secretary RFK Jr's insane beliefs - Doesn't believe that germs cause illness; suggests HIV doesn't cause AIDS; suggests antidepressants are behind mass shootings; believes that vaccines are harmful; suggests chemicals in water are changing children's gender identities... and is quick to promote supplements to prevent and treat diseases, such as recently recommending vitamin A for measles and falsely claiming children who die from the viral infection are malnourished. https://arstechnica.com/health/2025/04/rfk-jr-s-anti-vaccine-stance-is-rooted-in-a-disbelief-in-germ-theory/
    • Please register in order to view this content

      I missed the reference at the time, but those DAYS writers really like jokey character names.
    • Unfortunately they are not using this goddess to her potential.
    • Tamara Tunie is a goddess in my opinion.  She can totally bring the mesmerizing acting, when Anita is written for in an active way.  Anita is less interesting when written as a talk-to or a reciter of past events.  I think she'll be more in an active role at some point in the relatively near future? Pretty sure Daphnée is going to bring it soon!
    • At this point I think the core four are highly overrated. And Tamara Tunie's place on this show is an unexpected disappointment.
    • Have to say it, Michael Dietz looked stunningly handsome. The silver fox look suits him perfectly. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy