Jump to content

June 1-5, 2009


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Y&R's been tanking creatively. There are just too many "shocking" high stakes storylines going on to find it enjoyable. There's no time to breathe. Plus, the stories are convoluted and as I've mentioned in the past, character motivations are really suspect. Anyone who still labors under the illusion that Y&R is character-based drama needs to expand their viewing horizons. LML did plot driven storylines and was seen as the devil incarnate; MAB does them and is praised to the hilt. At least LML's stuff was somewhat interesting, if uneven. Her stories, whether you liked them or not, seemed to have a clear focus. I don't get that with MAB at all. When it comes down to it, Y&R, storywise, is no different from any other soap out there, but its many flaws are masked by stellar production values and overall good acting. As for B&B, the way I see it, its fortunes don't depend on its storylines as much as on Y&R's fortunes. As Y&R goes, so goes B&B. Unless there's something climactic on B&B that might slightly spike the ratings for that week, it essentially keeps apace with Y&R. I'm not sure there are a lot of people who say "hey, it's 1:30, time to flick on the tube to watch B&B." Rather, it's more likely "Y&R is over and I don't feel like getting up to change the channel." They could show a test pattern following Y&R (which some could argue would be more lively and better acted), and it would still get the same ratings. These will definitely be the last two shows standing. I wonder how done a deal ATWT's 2010 cancellation really is. Would a show on the brink of cancellation be hiring big guns like Michael Woods or Lynn Herring? It seems that they're making a valiant effort, something I don't think they'd be doing if cancellation was a sure thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

It wasn't about people saying B&B is next. It's more like B&B would be the next soap on CBS under scrutiny once ATWT ends, when CBS gives an official statement canceling ATWT. I know a lot of people say its going to end in September 2010, but CBS has not come forth and said so. It may very well be true, who know for certain. Also, a lot of people often insist that the Bell soaps (Y&R and B&B) would be the last 2 soaps airing. I don't believe that because I could see B&B ending it's run on CBS way before Y&R. They aren't a "package deal' like the PGP soaps. B&B is Bell Dramatic Serials and Y&R is majority Sony, then Bell then 1% Corday Holdings.

B&B is the second highest rated soap, but, it is not that far ahead of Days and the 3 ABC soaps. So really being 2nd place probably doesn't mean a thing in this climate. Especially if it's hitting new lows and the soaps right below it aren't hitting new lows, yet anyway. Being an international success doesn't matter either really because advertisers only care about how well it's preforming in the U.S. I personally wouldn't find it shocking to see B&B end (on CBS) let's say 2013. Nor would I find it shocking if Y&R, Days and the 3 ABC soaps were to be the last soaps on the air. I just have this feeling that ABC wants to have the final say in saying "We were the only network still airing soaps after NBC and CBS." I also find ABC being the network to replace their daytime with "Finding Erica, Southern Bells, Fashionestia Diaries, and Nightshift type programming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I like how you brought up the test pattern idea. I think B&B airs t 12:30 CT when it's airing at 1:30 after Y&R on the east coast. Now one thing that I always do when I'm home in the daytime is watch Y&R at 12:30 and then when it's over, I don't change the channel and I certainly don't watch B&B, I just do other things. Then at 2pm, I may or may not watch ATWT or OLTL, and if I don't watch them, I'll turn the tv off. I'm sure others may do the same.

However, if CBS moved TPIR to 10am and Y&R at 11, I'm sure Y&R would still do fine. But, if they moved B&B to 12:30 after the local news, I would not be the least bit surprised if there was a significant decline in B&B's ratings. An important note would be it is followed by the often low rated local noon news casts on the CBS O&O stations and affiliates. B&B definitely benefits for the most part by airing after Y&R. Even if it aired at 12:30pm in every time zone, after a local news cast, a decline in it's ratings would be evident as opposed to Y&R airing at 11am in every time zone. CBS knew what they were doing by placing it differently after Y&R.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Unfortunately, the past year's data does not bear out your prediction. B&B had a decline slope MUCH STEEPER than Y&R's. Thus, it seems to have been separately undermining its future, apart from whatever coattails Y&R gave it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Note to makeup - Smitty’s eyebrows, bad clamshell look.  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Okay I can buy that when Brook Lynn was a teen.  Now she knows the child is a boy one would think she'd be slightly suspicious.  Then again, Gio looks nothing like either of them so maybe not lol.
    • I've been behind & just got caught up & the last 3 days were amazing!
    • Yeah.  The hot, poor bad boy with a chip on his shoulder but with a heart of gold was a common soap trope in the 80s 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That's been an issue with me... the lack of a cohesive 'Have Not' crowd that has focus other than Leslie/Eva.   I would beef up Jan, Mona, Laura, Joey, and few other male characters.. and not just be out to overthrow the Duprees.. but co-existing and broadening the scope of the show since the show is called Beyond the Gates. I think the set up the show has with everything revolving around the Duprees will become predictable especially if they always win.   It would be like Victor Newman on Y & R for 40+ years.. always winning, hardly ever losing.   With MVJ/Guza.. both trained under that mindset... I fear that will happen.   I've always heard from a performer that is playing a character like Leslie/Dana that you have to find the victim/hurt beneath the surface in order to play a villain/villainess... and I think that's why I enjoy watching her.. because she brings so much more to the part than what the writers put on the page.
    • I figure that was really hard for Dom to do. I completely GET why they wrote it the way they did but I wonder if it was necessary. Meanwhile I have 2 really icky ideas in my head. Drew is going to blame Tracy KNOWING it was not her. Dante is going to blame Lulu.  After that, everyone else is going to be mad at Lois.  Tracy is going to double down on wanting to get rid of Sonny. Sonny's going to be more dug in to stay because he now has a new descendant. 
    • I can actually buy Brook Lynn being so self-absorbed and incurious that she never thought to question why her mom and grandma were so attached to Gio. 
    • It was overkill and the whole narrative Lois was too nice to the orphan kid when he was little, WHAT? Like Emma said no one thinks Gio is a troublemaker that gets 14-year-old kids drunk for fun. That being said, Lulu figured this Gio thing out in episode, but Brook Lynn never once questioned Lois and Gloria's attachment to a child that was the same age as the baby she gave up?  Ever?
    • Thanks for finding that. I may have been thinking of this blog entry.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy