Jump to content

Another World Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I understood the original plan to go with Josie/Matt...she was the daughter of a Frame and he was the son of the two people that were involved in the death/downfall of a Frame.

It was set up as the late 80s version of Romeo and Juliet during the strike and post strike.  

However, Josie lit up as a character when she was around Ruben and it's a shame that P & G was too skittish to go forward with it because of one segment of the audience.

AW was lower rated so what did they have to lose by moving forward with the coupling.  But P & G was more skittish and risk adverse in general compared to ABC so any blow back from an audience standpoint and they backed off.

It's why I kind of enjoyed their 1988 writer strike episodes...some great male and female conversations were happening.  And those episodes really helped give Ronnie and Lisa some good dimensions/layers that neither really got during non strike episodes.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 13.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I had noticed for a while, her interviewing skills seemed to be diminished.  She often focused the conversation on herself, rather than on her guest.  And of course she always had a host of technical problems.  Still, her podcast was always worth a listen.   

Edited by Mona Kane Croft
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I enjoyed her podcasts but she never seemed to get the hang of the technical aspects. I get it, some people (like myself) just don't understand all the "gadgets" out there. lol. I loved hearing some of the backstage AW stories. I wish there were more. 

I do hope she's well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Did anyone receive their videos from the AW Reunion that was held in 2024?  I did not order the video, but last I heard, people who did order had not yet received theirs. But that was several months ago, so maybe everything is fine now. Just curious about it. And I'm surprised no one has posted the video on Youtube. Was there a problem with the video?

Also, did anyone else think Alan Locher's lack of reaction after the reunion was a little odd?  I understand he attended the reunion (or at least planned to), hoping to get some interviews and possibly even shoot some of his own video.  But after the reunion, I don't think Alan even publicly mentioned the event at all.  Makes me wonder if he was disappointed in the event, or perhaps if he had some reason for his lack of reaction.  Considering he promoted the reunion a bit before it happened, it seemed odd to me that he never released any type of report or even a comment about it, after the fact.  Of course it's possible he did post some type of reaction or report, and I just missed it. But I don't think that is the case.  

Edited by Mona Kane Croft
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have not received my video.  I reached out to Karen last October and she was very unpleasant.  She told me she was providing updates on social media and I told her I do not follow her so those updates are useless to me. She offered me a refund which I declined because I want the video.  I have not heard a thing from her since.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Any speculation from either of you about what caused the problem?  

I am in communication with two of the older actors who were present, and they have not had good things to say about their experience at the event.

And I recall reading online that Linda Dano was a real cheer-leader at the beginning of the reunion festivities, but later became offended by something and left the event early.  

If any of this is accurate, then what the heck went wrong?   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think that she bit off more than she could chew. I mean, why did she do this all by herself?

I know some people who got the whole package & they've gotten their souvenir glass but like us, no video! And, I don't know if this made into what I posted but she told me she was going to have to sue the videographer that she hired.

BTW, I have asked a dear friend to reach out to Linda Dano. She has replied, saying, yes, she will email her tomorrow. So, if we're lucky she will get a reply.

And, as you can probably tell, the thing most wanted is that video.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'd be interested to hear of Linda Dano's experience at the reunion.  But something tells me Linda is too classy to criticize the event publicly -- even if she may have found it troublesome at the time. We shall see . . .

And something seems a bit too convenient regarding the video.  The one thing people paid money $$$ for -- unfortunately not going to be delivered because of a lawsuit.   Couldn't she have just said the videographer died?  LOL.   

One more thing -- nobody (other than me) has mentioned the radio-silence from Alan Locher.  After promoting the event on his podcast, and even attending -- not one word from Alan about his experience at the reunion, after the fact.  Does anyone else find that strange??   Having said that, I'm aware Alan Locher avoids controversy at all costs. So if Alan thought the reunion was neet-o, super-cool, and groovy, he would have shared his positive opinion loud and clear.  But if he was disappointed or embarrassed by the event, Alan would stay silent.

So far, I believe Alan has been silent.    

Edited by Mona Kane Croft
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Keith D Robinson is 49. Maurice Johnson is 46.
    • I hope they give him more to do than just be a prick as you say. I can see how viewers would like him because the actor is so charming despite the character being such an absolute pain.    I would agree. And there was also the undercurrent of Raven and Draper sort of flirting with each other. The actors play that attraction and it worked so well in that scene. 
    • Daniel Cosgrove is PERFECT as the sleezy politician. This might be my favorite role of his. All of these people keeping Kristina’s secret is so annoying. I really want her to pay.
    • What did happen to Beth between 86 and 89? Did she have amnesia?
    • I actually thought he came off as younger. It's so hard to buy Martin as Nicole and Ted's son unless they had him when they were 12.
    • @chrisml Isn't remarkable that, on a soap whose brand is built on twists and mysteries, that Raven's last straw was as simple as Logan saying that she was incapable of loving Jamey.  In the episode when Raven exit's and leaves Jamey with April, I can remember feeling the subtext that Raven is also trying to talk herself into leaving him behind.  There's so much in that little scene.  She's trying to stick it to Logan for saying she was a bad mother.  She's both granting April's wish, and damning her with the old adage of being careful what she wished for.  And, she's hinting to Draper that she's going to boff his father. It remains my favorite scene, and it still blows my mind that was not the end of that episode.  
    • Oh lord not Drew just figured out it was both Nina and Portia that set him up. Willow WILL never leave this man. Ric taking the case purely just to spite Sonny is [!@#$%^&*].ing hilarious.
    • And in addition to Patti being de-aged, she was no longer a nurse, divorced from Len(fair enough) and her two children were not seen and barely mentioned. So basically she was a totally new character. For newer viewers it didn't matter but any loyal viewers would have been wondering about all the changes with Patti. Sarah Whiting always puzzled me. The writers finally decide to acknowledge Jo's family and do so by making up a never mentioned adopted teen. Why not just bring in Tracey, Jo's actual grandaughter? As for Liza, perhaps it would have been wise to rest the character when Sherry left. They were big shoes to fill and her Liza was so identified with Travis. I don't recall what was going on in the story at that time but if they knew Sherry was leaving, write it so Liza would leave town to care for an ailing Janet and take a breather with the character for a few months.
    • Ahh interesting. Yeah, that's sad for A-M. I will say, he and Nick became fast friends when Susan started working at Spaulding. A-M/Lucy/Nick/Susan had a lot of double dates in those 7 months. A-M was Nick's best man at his wedding to Susan, which now that I think about it, is odd that he wouldn't have considered Fletcher. I remember those two were so close at the paper, and even living together with Ben. Once Tangie left SF, Nick left the paper, and Fletcher/Holly were rarely seen... so I guess they felt that friendship wasn't shown often enough anymore (which again, lazy writing).
    • I honestly don't think Alan-Michael ever really had a friend on the show. Maybe Cameron or Samantha, but otherwise... *Cameron was a high school friend who ended up dating teenage Dinah after she broke up with A-M. Samantha is Phillip's biological sister, who A-M treated like a sister. Interestingly enough, they were born the same week on the show in 1981, but A-M ends up being older than her when she returns to town in '89.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy