Jump to content

Another World Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 13.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Catching up on the Marianne episodes, I am stuck between a rock and a hard place. 

Given John's history with Lee, I understand why he is so hard on Marianne. 

I do find it extremely odd (and gross) that Chris is trying to bed an underage girl; however, I have to keep reminding myself that this occurred in '75, so it was probably common at this time. I am picking up that Chris will most likely pan out to be a cad that wants to get in Marianne's pants and leave her. 

I am just waiting to see what Aunt Liz does going forward b/c that scene of her catching them and listening on... you could just see the wheels spinning in her head before she goes in for the kill. 

Overall, I love the simple stories that create so much drama. I wish that Ariana Mueneker had full episodes from that time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Amusingly, is there anything more indicative of an actor’s ego than saving only their own scenes? It’s akin to actors who read only the parts of the script in which they appear. However, giving her the benefit of the doubt, she probably posts scenes that she is in to comply with YouTube rules.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

How old are Chris and Marianne supposed to be? I thought she was just finishing high school and deciding whether to go to college and Chris was still a college student. So not a huge age gap and not necessarily anything one would raise eyebrows over. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Marianne has finished high school and is preparing for her freshman year in college.  So she is likely 18 years old.  Chris is a college student, so he is probably no more than 4-years older than Marianne.  

On the other hand, the age difference between the actors is wider.  I believe Ariana was 15 or 16-years old at this point, and she has posted in her Youtube comments that the actor playing Chris was 15-years older than her.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think it's about YouTube guidelines. Proctor and Gamble don't seem to care about people posting their old soap material so I don't know why YouTube would. It's really only a problem for soaps still on the air. Sony will yank Days material down in a hot second. Whole episodes of GL, ATWT and AW have been posted for years.

I don't think her only having scenes she's in is so much about ego as it is about the fact that she's not a fan of the show. One thing I've noticed over the years is that we expect actors to be into the shows as much as we are. For a lot, if not most, of them it's just another gig. They're not necessarily soap fans or even a fan of the show that they're on. Whereas we fans of the shows would want whole episodes, an actor might only be interested in the scenes in which they worked. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It has probably been 10 years now since YouTube did that massive purge of ALL GL videos!!! When all of the Bandstand Mike videos came down & people found out that he sold hard drives of GL & took people's money but never shipped the drives. I have no idea if Procter & Gamble was behind that, though, since YouTube does not require that someone have standing to make a copyright claim! 

And, the company that made copyright claims on my Classic DAYS episodes was neither Sony nor Corday. 

The last person who made claims against my account was not a company at all, just a person. Since some of them were GH Kraze videos I wondered if it was an issue of bigotry. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's not an ego thing. Many soap actors of the classic era went out of their way to keep copies of scenes they treasured via kinescope or otherwise, believing they would never be archived or seen again. We know Jacquie Courtney here and Ellen Holly at OLTL did this with famous scenes and episodes, particularly with the Carla Gray story which was hugely important. We'll be very lucky if any of them eventually surface, as so many other clips and eps have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Thanks for searching through everything. Worked on them so long, just too lazy to check for those links myself, so I am glad you chose to do it! I guess I never did type out anything for 1973-1977 in regards to the preemptions, but they are on the charts at least (and this far back, they don't seem to do any of those "breakouts" anymore, so things are simpler in the 1970's, so eventually I could type those out). 
    • I dump on the Y&R sets problem all the time, but BOLD is no better -- and they're not even introducing new sets. All of their sets are years old, and very few look like they're inhabited by people with money. Is that going to change with this move? I'd rather they save the money spent on another remote, which is no better than an HGTV travelogue, and get some new/better sets.
    • The donut posts here make up for a Friday show that was barely meh. Aside from seeing Anna, I really didn't care much about anything else. While I understand the thought behind breaking up all the sadness with "other scenes," I'd rather they moved right to John's funeral. Instead of hearing a stupid story about John changing some minor character's tire 20 years ago, just move on to the crying. I also thought the Chad and Cat scenes were a waste. I realize not everyone is devastated by John's death to the point of not functioning, but going sky diving is a choice. By the way, Jack and Jennifer are giving me nothing on this return. Please leave asap. DAYS did such a great job with John's death, so ending the week this way was a letdown.
    • Add Dr. Montgomery to list of fine women on this show! I hope the show goes forward with Madison/Chelsea and then once they're developed, bring back Allison, who is now divorced or a widow, for a Madison/Chelsea/Allison triangle.  It would definitely be the hottest triangle in daytime.  
    • I wonder if Linda Bloodworth-Thomason had Kim in mind for any of her other characters/series. If they intended Allison Sugarbaker (Julia Duffy's character) to be more in line with who Suzanne was/Delta Burke's portrayal-persona, then I think Kim would have aced that. Yes, it would have been odd, Kim having previously played a different character (from a different family), but Designing Women wouldn't have been the first show with that issue. Or maybe Kim could have played Beth Broderick's role on Hearts Afire. Or Patricia Heaton's role on Women of the House.
    • Sony is probably waiting until Y&R’s lease is up as well. All of TV City is going to be gutted, so they have to relocate at some point. 
    • At this point Y&R's next step is to go fully green screen and have the actors Zoom from home.
    • I was just taking about this in the Y&R thread - they desperately need better studio space. 
    • Errol posted that Ed Scott retired  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy