Jump to content

Nielsen accuracy and it's effect on Soaps


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Here is a question, I've seen passing mention to Nielsen's innacurate tallying methods, and I'd like to discuss that. How do they do this in modern times? Do they even bother with trying to gather numbers from viewers who watch TV OTA (Over the air)? So my question is, how they gather their info, and how is it flawed? Which markets do they use?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Neilsen still uses probability sampling, which is the single best method. It is flawed of course...to the extent that you misrepresent population segments. Rare segments, and viewers of low-number broadcasts have a particular risk of being under-counted. The larger the Neilsen sample, the better the numbers. This is why the Sweeps periods would actually be decent (since all those supplemental diaries get mailed everywhere), except the networks fiddle with the schedules, rendering all numbers useless.

I am assuming that as DVR market penetration gets closer to the universe, more and more use will be made of the ability to count everything that is watched and recorded. Already, TiVo is selling a DVR-based counting service to networks/broadcasters. That will be sort of a highly refined version of the "people meter". Of course, to truly count everthing, each TV would have to be DVRd, and you'd need a login system of sort to track which viewers are watching what.

What people need to remember is that while Neilsen can be flawed, there is nothing better. At this time, any alternative would be worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As a former Nielsen family I will go through the process of our selection and maybe it will help.

First they contacted us by phone and did a brief interview to see if we were interested. We were chosen based on some surveys I had filled out.

They took down basic info about size of our household, # of TV's, amount of TV we watched, and the ages of each household member. They said at the time our particular age group with our kids was needed, plus we had my mother living with us. That put us as a household that waivered across 3 different demos.

Next they came out and did a in-house interview that lasted 1 hour and inspected all of our TV's, VCR's and game systems. This all included getting an average of who watched what TV and a basic idea of how often. They determined to count 2 viewers for the living room TV, 2 for my daughters bedroom, 1 for my son, 1 for our bedroom and 1 for my Mom's room when those particular TV's were on. They also came up with another formula that covered various other situations of when 2 TV's in the house were on or 3 or just 1. Each got counted as a different number of viewers depending on how many TV's were on.

With all of that and the signing of papers they accepted us.

They came back another day and installed switches into every TV, VCR, and game system in the house. This told them when that TV was on and what was being watched. It told them if the VCR was turned on and if it was taping a program or playing a movie.

Each month we got a check figured to a percentage of how much TV we watched. I think the biggest check we ever got was 33 or 35 dollars.

We stayed a Nielsen family for a year. When all of our ages went up we moved to different brackets in some of the demos which threw off their sampling numbers so we were dropped.

They called a year ago and asked if we interested again as they needed one of our demos again, but when they learned there were only 2 of us living here now they were not interested.

Everybody talks about the diaries but the whole year we were a member we never filled out a diary. The boxes counted everything for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You know, it seems in this electronic age, Nielsen's method seem WAY antiquated. I'd like to make sure they sample homes from large and small markets, I bet they are really low on sampling RURAL homes, the type that watch soaps VERY heavily. What is the market penetration for our soaps now? I know years ago, affiliates carried a show, and sometimes they didn't. At the end of Y&R, you'd hear Bern Bennett every day say, "Stay tuned for Search For Tomorrow....next over most of these CBS stations". The key word there is MOST. I talked with a gentleman who lived in both Kansas City and Des Monies, Iowa through his life, and he said the NBC affiliate in Kansas City, WDAF, never aired DOOL until 1971, and WHO in Des Moines didn't pick it up until 1984 according to him! Does this still happen alot today? I know I read about affiliates dropping the show being one of the last big blows for Edge Of Night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Yes, it has. It was seen in the episodes when Dani broke into the house while Hayley and Bill were on their honeymoon. Dani and a Fairmont Crest security guard were also shown outside the house's entrance. Bill and Hayley were seen in the foyer when they returned. I imagine the set will resurface when there's a need for it.
    • There is some kind of arrangement going on between Justin and Evie, who seems to be caring for Sam. I'm not sure, but she may even be living there with Justin and Phillip. Phillip inviting Evie at least makes a little more sense (if the guest list was limited to women Vanessa liked, it would've only consisted of Trish and Helena. lol)  Maybe it was more common to hang on to performers, back in the day? Instead of immediately kicking them to the curb? Evie hadn't had much to do after Chet was revealed to be her stalker. With Rita, Jackie and Ben gone, there weren't many on the canvas she'd really worked with, other than Ross. They could've pivoted her back to Ross, instead of letting him languish love-less for nearly a year other than goo-goo eyeing Amanda. Nowadays, there might've been a moment written Jordan and Janet, an eye-wink to the audience about them having previously worked together.
    • I 100% agree that Bill and Haley's set would work better as a bedroom. I also think it might have made more sense to give them a penthouse instead of a mansion. Realistically they aren't going to have the room for multiple mansions, even with the larger studios. A more open concept penthouse would've been fine. I also wish more people lived together. The age confusion kinda messes that up but I would at least have Chelsea living with Dani. If Martin were Anita and Vernon's child (as he should be), I'd have these families living together as well. By doing that, the space used for Martin and Smitty's house could be used to build a dining room for the Dupree home and I'm sure it wouldn't be hard to throw a couple bedrooms in as needed.
    • CBS primetime was such a mess in the 1990s. 1990/91 fourth consecutive third place finish. 1991/92 to 1993/94 some signs of life but it didn't last.  1994/95 to 1999/2000 another primetime mess era. 1995 the sale to Westinghouse and Les Moonves arrived. The only bright spots were Touched by an Angel becoming a Top 10 show and Everybody Loves Raymond starting to show growth. CBS primetime would have a comeback in 2000 with the premieres of Survivor and CSI and Everybody Loves Raymond becoming a Top 10 show, and the rest is history.
    •  Thanks! For some reason I had misremembered ER and Chicago Hope going directly head to head but that may have been because of the hype about both shows.    Poor Connie Chung. She seem poised for success and possibly the next Barbara Walters. I don’t recall her co-anchor gig on the CBS Evening News was well received though. She kind of tanked her career moving into more a tabloid journalist role once at ABC and especially once she moved off network TV to CNN and later more infamously on MSNBC. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Strangely, it was Phillip who invited Evie to go to the ball with him. She had been taking care of Samantha, so I guess it was a way to thank her for helping Justin after Jackie's death? So she was not invited by Vanessa. Phillip brought her as his plus one. That Evie stayed on the canvas so long is extremely odd, especially since Ben was gone way before her. My theory is Marland was going to bring Rita back, so they wanted Evie to remain in place as her sounding board. When he left and Potter was still EP, that might have still been the plan. Once Kobe came in, that would have been thrown in the dumpster along with a lot of other story plans and characters.
    • Nina and Portia are generally presented as entirely too savvy to not think this ketamine (don't even GET me started on that) nonsense wouldn't immediately blow up in their face. Drew, the ex-navy seal and congressman, wouldn't get a drug test immediately after acting wildly out of character? Portia allowed this to so easily be traced back to her by roping in Brad, a man who can't stand her? Nina didn't think Willow would Stand By Her Man? Girl, PAY ATTENTION! I also find it disturbing how BOTH of them are gaslighting Willow. It feels gross. They should have presented Gio as anything other than a responsible, genial and affable guy if they wanted us to buy any of Dante's ranting about him. You've known this kid since he was a baby and suddenly you're yelling at him like he's the devil incarnate? It was so forced. Every one of them, including Dante, know that they all would have done the same thing in Gio's shoes. Teen gets drunk, friends cover for them. Gio's only 5 years older than him, barely allowed to legally drink himself. How was he to know the kid had alcohol poisoning? Alexa Havins crying every day over keeping a baby secret. Ahh memories. Molly and Kristina are just the worst to their mom and Alexis allows it. Kristina does need to be committed, she's a danger to herself and others. I wish Alexis would just tell her that she knows. I can't wait until Molly finds out about her almost getting Ric and Liz killed. I need her to body slam Kristina. Sasha thinks she knows EVERYTHING. She's always giving advice and painted as right no matter what. And so holier than thou while carrying a married man's baby.
    • Correction, Chicago Hope 1994/95 was initially Thursday 9 pm, a CBS dead zone and head-to-head w/ Seinfeld. 1994/95 CBS Thursday 10 pm initially was Eye to Eye with Connie Chung. Later in the season CBS did a scheduling shift with Chicago Hope moving to Monday 10 pm, Eye to Eye with Connie Chung moving to Thursday 9 pm, and 48 Hours moving from Wednesday 10 pm to Thursday 10 pm.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy