Jump to content

Ending the Conspiracy of Bloom preventing former Y&R head writers Jack Smith and Kay Alden taking over AMC


Recommended Posts

  • Members

on Friday Nelson Branco maked a shocking claim in his weekly Suds Report that Bloom killed the deal of former Y&R head writers Jack Smith and Kay Alden taking over AMC to me this make's no sense. why would Brian Frons allow AMC executive Julie Hanan Carruthers to fire them if it ment making AMC a success and also it would be a way to stick it to Bloom and CBS. Nelson Branco logic makes no sense and I don't belive his claims.

after all the talent stealing Frons has done to CBS and same with Bloom I don't belive for one second Brian would let Smith an Alden go becuase Carruthers said so plus Frons has the last say in all ABC soaps.

if your looking for the real reason why both Jack Smith and Kay Alden never took over AMC is because these two are from the school of Bill Bell and they have loyalties to the Bell family and both were asked to join B&B. plus im sure if they were asked to take over AMC it would have to relocate to NY where most ABC show's are taped.

don't forget folks as much as we rip Brian Frons and Barbra Bloom these two need to keep these soaps alive in order to keep thier jobs. GL is an exception because ratings dictated it was doomed no matter what nothing could of saved GL with the exception for the resuection of William J Bell lol.

any ways just my opition of Nelsons claim. what do you all think do you belive Nelson Branco claim?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Nelson Branco shouldn't be taken seriously. At all.

Kay Alden's reputation, as much as she did good on Y&R, is being destroyed at B&B.

They should have kept her at AMC and prevented all the EsenstenHarmonBrown/Pratt nonsense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Fact no. 1: She sucked while head-writing Y&R. Ask the people who worked for her if you don't believe me. She is not HW material.

Fact no. 2: Her bible for AMC was not good. Ask rain1.

Anyway, hilarious thread, hilarious first post. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No, she didn't! :P Not for the first three years or so, anyway. I don't know if she was a horrible bitch behind the scenes, but I've misplaced the writing team's members' phone numbers, so I can't confirm her attitude just now. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You know, I've had a little run-in with Nelson once, and I totally agree that he sets himself up for criticism with his overheated prose, imposition of himself in his columns, etc.

That said, I love his column, am addicted to him, and I believe he is the best thing to happen to soap "journalism" in a decade. Yes, he's the "Perez Hilton" of soaps in some ways. Who cares? Campy bitches are a huge part of soapdom, at least since Lisa/Eileen Fulton walked into Oakdale.

The truth of the matter is most of what he says or predicts comes to be true. What is untrue is nonetheless "scuttlebutt" from people who are a LOT closer to the industry we all love than we are. Thus, we get to hear the backstage noise as outsiders. Nelson lets us pretend to be insiders. Why is that a problem. It's a way of enjoying our genre from a "meta" perspective, in a potboiler kind of way.

Nelson, DC, and Roger Newcomb, each in very different ways, have done more to energize soap fandom than any force around. SOD/SOW are moribund and dying, possibly excepting Mala Bhatcharree who shows passion for the genre.

If you read Nelson as "dish", if you read his intent to poke sticks at beehives and to energize the fans...he succeeds better than any force out there.

My goodness...we're SOAP fans. Staid analysis and news replicated by three identified sources...I'll go to Wall Street Journal for that, and I'll learn from their analysis of our economic and political and even media affairs.

Nelson fills another niche, and he does it beautifully.

I have followed "hunterforrester" and "nbgemini" at his various internet haunts. My own conflagration with him suggests he may have a thin skin, and sometimes he becomes intemperate and engages in (sometimes unfair) battles that should not be fought.

But he fulfills the niche of a unique voice often providing information that we get from no other source.

Think about Higleygate. He showed us the smoke...and it turned out there was fire.

Some could argue "should the fans even be privy to this?" From an old school perspective, no. But since the early 90s, when we got to watch the bombs fall on Baghdad in real time, that school is dead and dying. We are real-time participants in news and current affairs.

What Nelson (and DC and Roger Newcomb, and others of that ilk) do is move soap "news" and "journalism" (I use those quotes because ... well ... soaps a pretty silly little genre to occupy oneself with...and I say that as a die hard fan) into the modern, real-time era. The "news" is unfiltered, unedited, and sometimes wrong. But it makes us "co-participants", in a way that is clearly engaging and entertaining for many of us.

Therefore, I do not understand the 'bash' mentality. IGNORE HIM if you feel he's unworthy of you. But to cite him AND bash him in the same breath seems, well, inconsistent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't get the Nelson hate At-TALL.

The guy is the only soap journalist who gets the GOOD stuff and isn't afraid to report it. And like it or not, the guy does have insiders. Everybody said his pre nom emmy list was bull, well, it wasn't. yeah he is abrasive and unprofessional. Do you have any idea the lawsuit this guy could be facing over Friday's report? i am assuming he has some cold hard facts..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, I know.... I just find him weird.... if someone at Daytime Confidential makes a comment about some actor, he immediately decides to say the same just to fit in. Otherwise, I like reading the news.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I like Nelson i think he's good for the soap industry it's just don't belive his latest conspiracy thats all just like his last week when he said Y&R is gonna hava a gay character but in the same paragraph called the Bells ultra republican if that's true Y&R will never have a gay character. he just stirs the pot thats all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Lets take bets as to when Julie Hack carruthers will be canned and replaced by Lisa Hesser DeLacroizdecazottelalooch. My guess is September.

If you think this guy would report something as potentially slanderous (or is it libel, i am too lazy) as that without facts, you need to rethink this.

I think is awesome that he is reporting the fact that our friends are our enemies. It explains alot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Jack Smith was hired to consult at GH, Kay Alden was hired to consult at AMC and to a lesser extent OLTL. I highly doubt Frons wanted them as a team at AMC alone for that matter. It doesn't add up to me.

And please, you're going to tell me Julie Hanan Carruthers has that much influence over Frons?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I guess RTPP looked worse because it followed Another World, but it's a shame they didn't give it more time especially considering how the shows that were put on following it fared.
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Durkin was awful. The writing did her no favors, but she was all wrong for the part, lacking the mix of mystery, steeliness, sorrow and hesitancy that defined Victoria. I still have the awful memory of Adam lugging her around like a rag doll. She looked much more like one of the Blue Whale dancing extras than Victoria. And her voice... Maybe I am too harsh. With that said, Curtis didn't seem as bothered. I see from a fan review mentioning Barnabas & Company that Durkin was asked to return for Victoria's final episodes and declined as she had a Christmas trip to Europe with her husband planned and wasn't interested in just a few appearances.  I refuse to believe Victoria actually died during the Leviathan storyline. If Barnabas and Angelique could come back 8 times, she could come back a few.
    • It's a shame she only appeared in three episodes for the purpose of being written out - I thought she was quite good in the little we saw. I liked her vibe better than Durkin that never seemed to quite capture Victoria as a character.
    • He did a lot of romance novel covers, so that might've just been enough for them to get their panties in a twist.
    • Pre-TGIF, ABC most successful 1980s Friday 8 pm comedy I'd say was Webster. Full House wasn't a hit its first two seasons but it started showing growth in its third season which overlapped with the launch of TGIF. Funny thing is, Full House became a Top 10 show with the 1991/92 move to Tuesday.
    • Oakland Tribune, 14 July 1985   AW is another show with Schenkel at helm By Connie Passalacqua For the most part, dictators of South American banana republics enjoy better reputations than executive producers of daytime soap operas. Total authority is vested in these producers, who can kill off a character (thus firing an actor) with a stroke of a pen, or completely change life in his or her soap opera dominion (both in its fictional locale and backstage at the studio) on any kind of whim.  Most rule despotically, inspiring fear in their actors and writers. Which inevitably surfaces on the screen and subtracts from a show's quality. Then there's Stephen Schenkel who became executive producer of Another World last fall. He's been described by one of his actresses as "a teddy bear." He has noticeably improved the show, mostly because his natural warmth encourages backstage cohesiveness, and he believes in personally nurturing his staff and cast. 'I like to be supportive', he said.' I like to generate a certain amount of enthusiasm. I love actors and writers and technical people. And I like to laugh..  ' Schenkel said that most of the factors that have led to the shows improved ratings existed before he took over. There were well defined characters, outstanding writers and excellent production values, he explains. 'These things were in place but needed to be stimulated. There wasn't a lot of excitement. What really was missing was an adequate story. We added Gillian Spencer as a writer. (she also plays Daisy on All My Children), who's wonderful, and it just coalesced. The writers energy and commitment to the show began to give it an emotional intensity and some real passion within the characters." Schenkel, a former ABC programming executive who helped develop Ryan's Hope, is a strong believer in stressing romantic and comedy elements in soap operas. AW is also one of the only soaps with an established group of comic characters, including Wallingford (Brent Collins) and Lily Mason (Jackee , Harry). Schenkel raves about the talents of all his actors, and even has something good to say about the Brooklyn location of the shows studio, which most of his Manhattan-oriented staff loathe. I like the people here. I like to walk down the street and feel their energies, he said. He also violateda soap opera no-no, ' inviting actors and writers to the same party. "Everyone got to know one another, he said. And I didn't get any complaints about actors ' begging for story lines, he said. 
    • Since it's pride month.

      Please register in order to view this content

         
    • National City Star-News, 5 May 1977 TV topics by Peter Blazi Lear’s ‘All that Glitters’—doesn’t The best thing that can be said about Norman Lear’s newest soap opera“All That Glitters” is that it comes on so late at night most people will miss it. Role reversal is supposed to be the big draw, with women the breadwinners, mainly executives of a huge conglomerate. The men either fuss with the housework or fidget at the office as secretaries to their bawdy bosses. A female fantasyland? I doubt it. While the role reversal idea has some possibilities, the show pushes too hard for laughs and winds up with raucous females and effete males. A confident, independent woman is indeed a sight to behold and attract, but femininity need not be sacrificed. Unlike Lear’s “Mary Hartman, Mary Hartman,” "Glitters” doesn’t, but you’ve got to give him credit for trying. Today’s experimental comedy is what tomorrow’s hits are made of. Better luck next time, Norman. (“All That Glitters” can be seen weekday evenings at 11 p.m. on Channel 6.) .
    • Actually Kim Zimmer got six weeks off to test the waters for pilot season in L.A. - she said later she went on many auditions and got one offer for a sitcom, but she would one of many in an ensemble. She turned it down, because it wasn't worth leaving Guiding Light for a supporting role on a sitcom. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy