Jump to content

B&B: Week of March 30th, 2009 Discussion


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

That interview confused me.

He said some things about the state of the industry (things ARE sliding, but we have to compare to CABLE numbers...not historical broadcast numbers; soaps need to be cheap entertainment) that sounded "spot on". As a businessman, I actually trust his instincts MORE after that interview.

But then you are right...he also gushed over the creative state of his show, having his Logan family where he wanted them, etc....and one wondered if he was just spinning against popular opinion, or if he truly was that disconnected from reality. DaytimeFan has implied that there was some kind of creative recognition of things needing to be fixed in Dec/January...but we sure haven't seen that on the show, I would argue.

That said, I actually think the scene I put a cap of (above) COULD reflect a great creative move. If they play the sickness, the emotional damage...if they don't play it as "acceptable in the Forrester universe", but "repugnant, and we're going to show you how repugnant"...then B&B becomes an intentional study of psychologically ill people. I could totally get into that. But they have to play it not for camp, but as an "insiders view" into sickness. Friday gave me a bit of hope regarding that.

Anyway, it was just a terrific monologue for Rick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Hmmm...must have been. If I still have it, I'll scan the pic. Of course, because it is on SOD's newsprint-y paper, it'll look like sh*t and you'll probably see the other side of the paper shining through :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

See, I like to forget it is a fashion show.

I like to think it is a Bell show. And then, of course, playing the psychological subtext makes sense. I'd be fine if the Forresters left fashion and went into banking :) or publishing :). The fashion part has always been the part I hold my nose for...except during the Sally Spectra "fun" parts.

That said, I agree the endless hospital/crime stories of the past year were not an improvement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You are right. It was actually... Silly to portray fashion in daytime. To portray glamour, you need lots of money. Forresters fashion empire is a joke.

But perhaps emphasis on my post wasn't that. I just don't want to see depressing, long, drawn out stories on B&B.

I like banking. Banking show would be terrific.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Community Posts

    • Totally agree. AL isn’t suited to Summer written this way (which is, truthfully, in character). HK wasn’t credible in the boss-bitch moments, which AL plays more easily.
    • Welcome back, Tripp 

      Please register in order to view this content

      I’m glad Tripp is back in Salem and I like that he’s planning on being more assertive. He doesn’t deserve to get hurt again. Though I wouldn’t be surprised if some people in the Soap Universe are gonna be mad about his lines today Hopefully, we get some scenes of Johnny/Tripp and Wendy/Chanel. There haven’t been that many lately and this storyline definitely needs them. I think weaving Talia into it would be a good idea as well. She needs a new man now that the Colin storyline is over.  Rafe is still dumb. There really are no security cameras at that hospital that could have shown that Colin didn’t take Abe?? Speaking of Abe, his storyline is total ff material. James Reynolds deserves so much better than this. 
    • I've been rewatching early SATC (am mid-season 2), and am enjoying the mid-90s indie film vibe of the show at that time. It was a bit tougher and grittier but it also showed some of the growing wealth of the city at that time. SATC was always about pecking order and jostling for a better position, but on the romantic frontlines. I also enjoyed the Bad Dating SLs LOL. I understand why it went the fairytale-ish route. Part of this mirrored the evolution of the city itself, as Manhattan became more moneyed and, dare I say, unaffordable. It was a glamorous city that many aspired to live in and conquer against the odds. Part of it was also, as the show progressed, our own growing investment in the main cast and their SLs. Hence less standalone episodes and more a continuing soapy story of romantic relationships. IMO, this was a fairly organic evolution.
    • Lanier is fine but I miss Hunter King as well. A lot of the material AL is struggling with currently HK would’ve had an easier time playing, she could knock out those bratty whiny freakout moments with little effort. AL’s Summer should be written as icier and more indignant.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy