Jump to content

Is the soap world asleep?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Yes. I think that the format should be tried in daytime at least once to see how it goes. It can be based on already established characters from a soap, last about 2 to 3 months and be shown about 3 to 4 times a week. Telenovelas when well written and acted can be a hit. The audience can become invested in a short period of time if the stories are well told. Also, the characters become popular can launch another telenovela based on new stories.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

As someone who was a very rabid fanatic for their programming, MyNetworkTV was great. A network, subchannel SOAPnet whose biggest weakness was never fully knowing its audience or understanding how to market itself. Is it a miniseries? Is it a soap opera? Is it Renegade or Silk Stalkings?

There were way too many recap episodes and filler episodes for my taste, but MyNetworkTV had decent production values and great headliners for it's campy, non-action/adventure shows. As much as I didn't enjoy Desire and Watch Over Me, I thought their action scenes and resolutions to the stories best anything I've seen in the last five years on GH. I recall there was a two hour block of Desire the Friday after Thanksgiving and the standoff between the mob daughter and the buffoons that stole her father's money and fortune was great. Desire and Watch Over Me really rewarded their viewers at the end of their run. Wicked Wicked Games did as well. Fashion House, not so much.

I also blame the general soap audience for not giving these serials a fair shake. As previously discussed, I don't think anyone should embrace mediocrity, but the general consensus within the industry and on the boards is that no one truly wanted to acknowledge these shows(or any other daily dramatic series that didn't air between 12-4PM) as soap.

What I'm sad about is the experiment was originally ordered for syndication. I thought this would have went over very well with the daytime audience(that may have been too busy watching Grey's Anatomy or something else in Primetime) and the expectations for the shows would have been alot less. They'd probably still be airing cycles and may have inspired networks or other syndication companies to make their own novellas or syndicated soaps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There is no guarantee of success, but I would like to see if the telenovela formula might work on say, NBC after Days. Our attention spans are so short these days that a knowing that there will be certain resolutions to stories might bring in significant portion of the soap audience. There may be a segment of the soap audience that wants a couple that they enjoy to have a happy ending instead of years of break up and make ups. I think that main characters do have to be familiar to the audience for it to be successful. For example, Steve and Kayla could be the couple whose children's adventures are told. It is an experiment that would be worth every penny if it can save the most endangered soaps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think telenovelas could be successful, but they have to aim high, but expect that this type of storytelling needs to grow on viewers. NBC would be the perfect outlet for this, because they are used to not being #1 anyway, per Jeff Zucker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That is true.

The whole project just felt rushed. They didn't plan enough, they just cooked up something together without much thinking about it and this is the result they got. It doesn't help that I believe people in charge showed absolute lack of conviction and interest in these shows. Had they, things would be different now.

They underestimated the audience and it came to bite them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don´t think any sane producer will ever go into a show knowing it has to end after 3-5 months no matter what. That´s maybe possible for non comercial financed production, but the last thing any producer want is a limited run. It costs money for a new show to promote, it costs money to do the casting, train the staff and put the show on track. Let´s assume the new show is succesfull. Does really anyone believe the producer would let it end just because the story ask for it? I mean, this is a world where even a show called Prison Brake got another two seasons AFTER the main goal from the title was fullfilled.

Look at Hollywood. They are scared s*it to do anything new. They rather remake some bad 80´s horror flick just because the name is still somewhat familiar. It doesn´t matter the new movie has different actors, different plot and diffrerent director, the investors still believes the box offices recoverability is better just because all those weird fans from 80´s who will for sure go to see the movie.

The reason why daytime soaps are longterm and so vague in its basic premise is exactly so they don´t have to end no matter what. Because it´s much cheaper to just change the creative force behind the show than start a new show. People gets tired of some couple or character, the couple or character goes away. People gets tired with a certain style the show has, the HW and the creative team behing it are let go and the show completely revamps.

With telenovelas you are asking the producer to pitch a new idea to network each 5 or so months. And in the case the show is succesfull you are asking them to voluntarily cut their fat cow just when audience is getting crazy and numbers are shooting up. Even if we assume the production staff behind stays pretty much the same and all these shows are taped in the same studio, you still have to build new sets, buy new costumes, hire new actors. Bet a lot of money on a completely different story and leading characters each 5 months. What is the success ratio of stories on soaps? 1:5, or even less? There is no reason to believe the telenovelas would fare better, probably worse, because a lot of the best soaps stories and couples was not planned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the soap world is in such a creative slump. Doug Davidson said it best at the Paley Center, that in the past Soaps were the trail blazers. There stories were unlike anything ever done on TV. Now, it is all about recycling past successful plots with little success. The faster storyline pace takes away from that dramatic climax that made soaps so addictive. I have not had a seen that made me cry, cringe, and finally breathe a sigh of relief since Bianca got her baby back in 2004.

So many soaps, AMC especially, have moved to this "tell and don't show" model that I think has diluted the impact of storylines and scenes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I had forgotten that several Days stars came out strong against Melissa. Good for them!
    • That would have made sense. Did all these characters get dropped when DePriest left or had they already been dropped?
    • The other issue with Missy: in June 2020, she "liked" some social media posts by Candace Owens -- things Candace said that were against Black Lives Matter.  That is described here https://tvline.com/news/melissa-reeves-racism-days-of-our-lives-instagram-controversy-2894568/ I don't know if that was ever resolved.
    • She appeared onscreen not long after Rose Livingston and Sara Montaigne, and we found out that Sara was Rose's estranged daughter. I wonder whether Peggy might have been part of that family group -- or else they were just juggling a few different potential mysteries so that they could develop whatever seemed to be getting the best response from the audience. They didn't do anything much with Rose and Sara really either. Maybe Rose would have become more prominent if Rachel and Mac had split up over Mitch, or if Sara had really flourished. In some ways I can picture Cheryl being affected by MJ's prostitution similarly to how Josie was distressed by finding out about Sharlene. But I can also see that Josie as a Frame being involved with Matthew would have different stakes for Rachel and Sharlene than Cheryl being involved with Scott. I do think the solution for Cheryl would have had to be a badder boy than Scott -- either a real bad boy who would do her wrong, or the kind of bad boy (not Chad!!!) who is essentially misunderstood and other people just don't understand. Cheryl would also have been better off with some friends her own age. Matthew and Josie benefited a bit from having other teenagers to interact with.
    • Sally Spencer was a decent actress, but the writing destroyed the "M.J." that Kathleen Layman had built. Layman had a quiet strength about her, and she and Osburn really felt like sisters. Spencer's character should have been either an unmentioned sister, or maybe Jake's that grew up close to Kathleen, M.J. and the rest, but was away for a few years before joining the force. Kristen Marie was o.k., but I always got a mousier vibe from her. Being pigeon-holed with Scott for most of the run hurt things for her, as well.  The Loves were also underserved between Rhonda Lewin and Philece Sampler. Philece would have been better as Nicole. Thank goodness Anne Heche  showed up for the next round of auditions. Christopher Holder was mediocre as Peter, but given a shot, I think Marcus Smythe could have stuck around for a while.  I would have had Peggy Lazarus be a Frame -- possibly an ex-wife for Vince with an agenda. Smythe and Hollen had  a fun chemistry that could have kept the two around.. Bringing recasts for  Cheryl and Ben back mixing it up with other Frames. Corys, Lawrences at the time might have kept all the families stronger. 
    • shoot...he said in that Locher room with Krista. I think he met her before that---she was doing Broadway and they had mutual friends or an agent maybe?
    • Yes. And I assume he met Mary Ellen Stuart at GL.
    • That's an odd coincidence. Yeah, Roger would turn anything he could to his advantage. At the time, he's just taking the pictures to bank leverage over Reva, Billy or the Lewises.  I'm kinda squeamish about 1986 episodes myself. I'd love to hear the original version of Ross/Vanessa/Dinah, but the Cain story is bad, and I don't want Billy and Vanessa to break up.
    • Eeek. I didn't know this either! I will say, though, even though they skimmed over a lot of Roger's past, I will give them props for not trying to turn him into a hero. Yeah, I was hoping we would get more 1986 episodes than were available on YT before, but now I'm wondering if I really want to see that. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy