Jump to content

Will the economic downturn finally be the death of soaps?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

With the economy on the fritz will this signal a continued transition to less costly television - more talk shows, game shows, news shows, and reality shows? We have seen the cancellation of several shows on ABC primetime, none of which were horrible ratingswise(although not great), what's next? We have also seen Days get rid of major stars, both Days and ABC undergo pay cuts, what could be next?

Articles I have read in USA Today, local newspapers all covered the firing of Deidra and Drake discussing the end of soaps and how ad rates for all of television are down and that this could be the final nail in the coffin for soaps. Could inexpensive TV like reality tv and talk shows continue to replace shows on primetime that get cancelled make their move to daytime? Why does ABC continue to focus on how wonderful The View's ratings have been while not focusing on how improved 2 of their 3 soaps have been? Why did CBS do nothing to promote sweeps at all?

It's sad to see an era potentially coming to an end sooner rather than later. Is it possible people might gravitate back to soaps?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

It would be great to see soaps use this as an opportunity to get back those lapsed viewers by returning to what's familiar and gives comfort to those viewers during these tough times.. Focusing on family and history could be the ticket. Maybe Y&R's recent foray back to the classic soap and OLTL's improvements will signal a turn back. I hope so.

But I was also a big fan of sitcoms and am hoping this might mean more lighthearted entertainment as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

OT... I must be totally out of the loop. A Dark Shadows movie?????? :D I could be in heaven, unless it turns out to be like the Dark Shadows TV remake 20 or so years ago. :rolleyes:

Back on topic, I just think the economy is affecting more than daytime. Reality TV was already becoming rampant, in part because it's cheaper to make. I just don't know what to think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't see it happening. There's too many other options. The people I've known who, for whatever reason, went through a period of being home during the day didn't start watching soaps. They started watching reruns of L&O and ER on TNT. By rerunning primetime shows in the daytime, these networks can give their viewers a daily viewing experience like soaps but with primetime production values at a fraction of the price. One of my friends tried getting into Y&R but started watching Gilmore Girls reruns on the picture-in-picture. Guess which show won out?

The concept that people will return to soaps assumes that a.) soaps still have something unique to offer and b.) that the "normal" viewer is interested in that something. I don't believe that's the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The few times I have been at the gym during the workday [mostly I work :)], it has been loaded in seniors. Target soap audience, right? Nah...they're all on Discovery and HGTV and cable (not so much fiction, from what I can tell).

Soaps are NOT "comfort food". You know, Rosie O'Donnell was speculating that her variety show was going to do well (it got LOADS of promotion) because it was depression-era "comfort food". Well, it tanked.

The old rules no longer apply. I don't know WHAT comfort food is nowadays...but I'm guessing it is "Flip that House" or something :).

Or World of Warcraft. Or whatever. Not soaps.

You know, I put up that chart once that used linear extrapolation to predict the end of soaps. What I did was use the current annual HH ratings loss, and I predicted that each show would be gone when its' HH rating hit 1.0. Based on that, I predicted the following death rates (around June 21 of this year):

2010 - GL

2011 - Days, ATWT, AMC, OLTL

2012 - GH

2013 - B&B

2016 - Y&R

Now, that was pure fantasy, because so many of the assumptions were likely bogus (like decline would continue to be bogus, like networks would hold on as long as a 1.0 HH, and that some soaps would survive after others died...for example, if ABC cancelled AMC/OLTL, I have a hard time believing they would hold on to GH...how would their daypart have any cross promotion potential?)

But, in light of the last week's news (GL lost 30% of viewers thus far in 2008, and 21% of the desirable demo; Days 40% cut and loss of stars and only 18 month renewal; ABC 50% cuts), these dates are seeming more and more plausible, aren't they?

Now I feel like we need to start a betting pool :-). Except who would bet on their survival?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You make a very good point. I watch those primetime reruns frequently when I'm home from work. Sometimes, I don't even worry about the soaps. Plus, with all the cable options, soaps have a ton of competition, even from the cable network that is supposedly supposed to be about soaps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's funny you say this because I for one did not get hooked onto Law and Order until A&E started running reruns on that station. I started watching and got interested based on that and started watching L&O on NBC. That helped increase the show's viewing audience I am positive. I think NCIS on CBS which airs re-runs on USA now(which has turned out to be huge for USA) has had the same luck. My dad who was undergoing chemo for 8 weeks got hooked on ER years back from watching the re-runs on TNT.

My niece a junior at Ohio State university, said that most of the students don't watch soaps in her dorm, mostly during their free time they are on their computers browsing the internet or tuned into ESPN and believe it or not the cable new stations like MSNBC, Fox, and CNN.

I find it sad and still believe network execs belief that they needed to pander to the 18-34 demo and sending the message they don't care about the older viewers was the real soap killer. Maybe I'm all wet on that.

I'm just hoping shows like Y&R can maintain their audience to some extent now with the improved writing and here's to hoping they do. I just wonder with advertisers cutting costs(the big 3 auto companies at one time were big advertisers on soaps), it has to impact daytime. It's impacting primetime so there is no way daytime is not affected. I just hope we don't get 7 more versions of GL on daytime. That would be worse then letting the shows end in a dignified manner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Tom Casiello is channeling Douglas Marland's famous rules by creating some of his own. And his rules (he calls them "myths" he is "busting") agree with yours.

The first is the "Teen Story Myth", and concludes

The second is "The Quick Cut Myth", and says scenes are often too short (in the service of building suspense and motivation for presumed short attention spans) to allow for emotional depths to be plumbed.

Three more myths-to-bust are coming this week...before the lucky dude goes to Key West! For an unemployed writer, he sure travels enviably :). I miss him when he is away.

Increasingly, Tom and Sara Bibel, IMO, have been real voices of sanity, experience, wisdom. From their experienced perspective, they often validate and elaborate on observations that other fans have also made in places like SON and elsewhere. I really wish the genre were in a place where it would listen to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • In fiction there has become an expectation by some that every Black character should represent excellence and perfection. It's not like we are talking about a Tyler Perry show where none of the characters are happy and everyone hates each other with a passion.
    • And on rewatch, I could've done without the unsubtle praising Matt like he was the only one who ever accepted Van as she was...but TPTB and their agendas.  It was totally in character for Vanessa to shut down emotionally until she was alone. While she could be volatile, both she and Henry believed in keeping emotions private.  Thank God it's still Bryan Buffinton in the role for both Henry's and HB's funerals. It just wouldn't have been the same with Ryan Brown, who couldn't act his way out of a wet paper bag. Roll My Eyes.
    • I can probably believe the Spauldings reacting that way, as Alan barely cares about anyone but himself and maybe his family, while Amanda only had that one experience with the Coopers, but I see your point. I do think 1997 was a better year than the last 3-4 before it, for whatever that's worth. You are right about Marcus. Kevin Mambo winning two Emmies (the latter during periods where he had nothing to do) helped.
    • I think @Darn @Faulkner and others have a fair point re: it being an unfortunate look and coincidence. I can see their point about the two Black husbands in rapid succession, without much time in between. Frankly, based on the early casting notices I thought before the show's debut (and I still suspect) that Ted's crimes might be far worse than infidelity or a secret baby. That would've mixed it up more. It's a soap, people are going to cheat, but it might've given them more variety if Nicole was stepping out first. Still, I wouldn't trade the Leslie/Eva reveal material for anything right now. Still, Fanfic Account #3 is just looking for any weapon to attack the show for not accepting his unsolicited scripts. When it's not the husbands it's Martin, or Chelsea or Dani. He's seething it got renewed.
    • I'm pretty sure Lucy and Bridget never even have another scene together for the rest of the time they're both on the show. Bridget isn't even invited to the wedding! The lack of community feeling and continuity of non-romantic relationships during this period is very jarring. Characters suddenly only seem to interact with a handful of other characters, rather than characters across the canvas. I'm deep into 1997 in my watch right now and find that it's even stranger because the show goes back and forth between ignoring history in order to manufacture some kind of separation between characters (for example, at one point Amanda refers to the Coopers as a family that the Spauldings "barely know," despite her and Alan spending the better part of 1996 going to war with Buzz over 5th street, and Alan has absolutely no reaction when he finds out about something bad that's happened to Abby, which seems pretty out of character given how close they were in 95/96) and ignoring history in order to create a sense of community that doesn't quite fit (characters who couldn't stand Amanda are suddenly acting all buddy buddy with her). The wheels really feel like they're coming off in 1997 (although I know some would argue that the wheels started to come off years earlier). Watching the Marcus/Dahlia romance again from a 2025 perspective is so weird. Marcus is a full grown man who must be at least in his mid-20s and he's dating a teenager who is not only still in high school, but is still fully a year away from graduation, and no one says anything about how creepy that is. I feel like the buzz around Marcus gave the illusion that the show was more invested in him than it ever actually was. Even during his "big" story where he's arrested for Cutter's murder, he actually doesn't appear on screen very often. He's imprisoned, Griffin is brought on, other characters make a fuss about trying to get him out, but there's a long stretch of time where he doesn't appear at all. I've been keeping episode counts while I watch and between Cutter's death in mid-November of 1995 and the end of the year Marcus/Mambo only appears 7 times (and of that only twice in December).
    • The letter reading was very emotional, and Maeve really got to me too. I was a little worried because Vanessa doesn't give a speech at the funeral, which surprised me, but then we got the private letter reading and her true emotional reaction and I was satisfied there. The YouTube channel I watch these episodes on (if not on our Vault), also had upset commenters talk about how Nola's line about Henry not accepting her at first/seen as a gold-digger was totally untrue. It's sad the writers don't do their homework and give fans the respect (and the characters respect). And yep, Bill got up and spoke at the funeral too, which was nice.  I didn't even realize that was Sharon Leal until you said it!  I had to Google it. I loved Sharon Leal in Boston Public back in the day haha. LOL at your Reva/Josh ALWAYS commentary. What is RME though?
    • Leslie is an extreme liar and manipulator. I'm not sure what her point was in trying to convince Nicole she wasn't trying to hurt her. As much as Eva did help orchestrate the entire plot I feel like there was too much piling on. Eva never said she wanted to be a Dupree so Anita was extremely out of line for that comment.  
    • Thanks!

      Please register in order to view this content

       That's positive and something to look forward to for sure, because you're right, 1996 so far isn't nearly as good as 1995. Ohh - what is Lonatrat?  Sadly you're probably right. I did feel like David was rarely seen once Marcus came on. That would have been an interesting spin, having Frank and Tina be teenage lovers and Dahlia really being his daughter. I'm getting the sense that Tina won't be seen too much anymore, as she just left Dahlia with Frank/Eleni as she's heading to jail for a while. I like the Tina actress too!  Her voice sounds a bit like Rosie Perez to me, which I love. I tried to find her online, but coming up empty. This was the only thing I could find about Tina Crede - a character snapshot video with clips and stills of her (randomly starting just before the 1:00 mark):

      Please register in order to view this content

      That's wild that the David actor is nearly 40 here! Definitely surprises me.
    • 5-6   Meh. It already looks like a scattershot week.    5-5 was actually a good episode. Damian and Lily. Phyllis finally going on the warpath that I knew she could get on with Billy and Sally. Nate started to question Audra and Victor's alliance. And I was not even bugged by Kyle and Claire.   But then there's Cole's off-screen story. Kyle and Claire going back to being whiny. And them even wanting Adam's penthouse just sounded like trying to keep the set around. And Diane shouldn't even give a flying frak about Billy's opinion. And Tessa, Daniel, and the guitars...yeeeah no.   But hey...JM looked good in that short. And those pants.  I agree. One of Y&R's good points with fans has always been that you do at least see the vets. And IN stories. 
    • One of the things that I found unnecessary and a bit disturbing about Ambitions was that in almost every episode someone was holding or shooting a gun.  Jamey and Ron seem to have the same fetish.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy