Jump to content

AW: The longest transition in history?


MichaelGL

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Reading this thread is interesting to me. My adoration for AW was very brief, and limited from the date of Cecile's big wedding to Peter Love, until shortly after the introduction of Sharon Gabet and Taylor Miller. So, we're talking maybe a year or two, right? During this period, Jackie Courtney briefly came back, and the two big stories that hooked me were Catlin and Sally, and the big Tony-the-Tuna mob stuff with Cecile's disappearance, which brought Cass, Kathleen, Felicia, Wallingford all together on their grand adventure. When the whole group travelled to Mallorca, I was in bliss. (Sharon Gabet's character was, for me, the biggest wet blanket ever thrown on this show...and I am even hearing impaired! The Catlin-Sally supercouple also couldn't survive the loss of the incredible Mary Page Keller.)

Now, in retrospect, this was all silly. I can barely remember all the plot details, but I just remember the show being regularly fun.

I remember that Charles Keating was short-haired then, and had the most incredible scenes with the young man who played his son, Perry. I remember Keating's amazing grieving after Perry died (I think after being the first to see Victoria?).

During this era, Jake and Victoria were introduced, Kathleen was introduced, Jackee Harry moved to front burner in terms of comic relief, Ada was given non-stop bon mots. There was a serial killer I seem to remember (with all the young characters in New York). It is funny to me that the plot is hazy (which suggests to me that this was NOT the strength of the show then), but the dialogue and casting and production values were terrific.

Anyway, what motivates this post for me is Kathleen. I can't imagine that Kathleen wasn't better with Cass than anyone else :). (Remember, I only ever monitored Frankie from a distance, since I wasn't watching, so I have no basis for comparison). Having Kathleen introduced and impersonating Cecile ended up being brilliant, because it really established Kathleen as the heir to that trouble-maker role. Hooking her into the MacKinnon clan (there wasn't a ONE of them I didn't like in the early days...although that changed for me with all the recasts and stupid stories that followed, IMO). Anyway, Osburn was so delightful to me, I could have accepted her with anyone.

(She reminds me, now in retrospect, of Cynthia Nixon...I wonder if I'd still see that if I actually watched again).

I know this is rambling, but it makes me wonder if Frankie's loss was more devasting for later viewers than it would have been for me. Or, instead, if it was the horrific nature of her death that made it so impactful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 16
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

On paper,DePriest's ideas seemed good,but the execution didn't always come off.

Jamie came back,played by Laurence Lau. think he was miscast.AW was trying to capitalise on his success on AMC,but he would've been better as another character(Mike Randolph?).Richjard Bekins was a hard act to follow.I wonder whether he should have returned to the role.Also,Jamie was made a doctor,which took him away from working at Cory,which was a big part of the character previously.

Jamie had past relationships with MJ and Nicole,but these were ignored.I thought it would have been a good triangle,as they were two very different types of women.There would also be some continuity,instead of constantly going in new directions.

Nicole returned(good move)but was given nothing to do and dropped.I thought Philece Sempler would have been a better Nicole than a Donna recast.

The Reg/Mary story gave the show a sweeping story that involved many characters.John Considine had the presence to make Reg an Alan Spaulding/Victor Newman type chracter but he became a stock villian who was dropped after a couple of years.

Had Iris been reintroduced earlier a Reg/Iris story could have been compelling.

MJ suddenly became an ex prostitute.Sally Spencer was no way convincing -the story would have been a better fit for Nicole.

The show killed off Zane.I think there was still a lot of mileage in the Zane/Felicia marriage.

Cheryl McKinnon was introduced and paired with Scott.This young love story was way too bland.Whereas Ben McKinnon ,who had a history with Marley,was totally ignored.

The Vicky recast,Rhonda Lewin,was given nothing to do,then written out.

The promise that the show would concentrate on core characters was kept to some extent,but as time went on,new characters were introduced that took the show away from those three families.

Mitch/Felicia?

There was talk of Pam,Rachel's half sister coming on,but it never materialised.

by the end of 86,Marley,Jake,Cass,Kathleen,Donna and Sally were all gone along with all the characters DePriest had written off eg Quinn,Maisie,Clarice,Larry,Thom,Grant,Dee,Maisie etc.

Then Philece Sampler was recast(miscast) as Donna.

I think the Matthews family should have been reintroduced.Maybe Russ,his child,Mike Randolph,Ricky(liz's grandson)

So,overall DePriest's stint was a continuation of what had been happening already-another nail in the coffin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • -- Daisy is a terrible name. If you're not going with a family legacy name, you gotta do better than that. -- When Frank is done with a character, he makes sure that character is painted in the worst possible way and the shade is thrown in the script. Natalia is being treated like a punchline to a bad joke....not that I mind. -- So Cody talked about Britt today. Gee, I wonder what's going on.
    • I remember another Phyllis residence -- I don't think that was a set shown abovethread, but I'm not sure.  Trying to remember some things off the top of my head but I might be wrong about part of it: I'm referring to the condo where Phick first had sex after the Michael/Lauren wedding.  I think they specifically referred to it as a condo?  After Stafford's Phyllis went into a coma, Jack sold it and I think he gave money to HunterKing's Summer when she married Austin? Or he gave Summer the condo?    There was a convoluted side plot about someone needing money and something from this was drawn in a shady way.  Something about it being sold?  And then when GinaT's Phyllis awoke from her coma, she had no condo to come back to.
    • Which union rules? SMH. Jill’s back, uncredited. 
    • Yeah I don’t get why she wouldn’t be credited if she’s back. That seems odd. I hope it’s true though, because the show needs a change. Badddddd.
    • The casino scenes came out of nowhere in comparison to the rest of the week, but at least there was some movement in the storyline. Joey has really made a fool of Vanessa. Chelsea is really embarrassing herself with this doctor. The desperation is so obvious and she clearly gets that from Dani. Hayley was giving Donna Logan vibes because that is how Donna acted when Eric had a heart attack. Stealing potential evidence is not going to reflect well on Kat and might throw the case against Leslie. Tomas had no business in Eva's hotel room even if he did shut down her advances. But I think they still might end up together at some point because the book that Eva gave him is the same one Kat called basic which seemed like foreshadowing.
    • So Sharon decides not to go to France and stay behind to support Mariah, but now with Phyllis gloating about getting an invite I’m sure she’ll change her mind.    Mariah’s secret is that she screwed that old man? I’m so confused about what’s going on here, and Mariah coming out and telling Tessa that she can’t know her secret is supposed to do what exactly? Is that supposed to put Tessa’s mind at ease? Lol…. I’m getting Cameron Kirsten vibes though. Did he do something to her without her consent and things went too far? These writers really can’t come up with something original if their life depended on it 
    • Eve and Thomas have so much in common--they both like reading (print and audio books) and wow they both like reading *fiction*!  (Also I would never pick up a book called Mercy and Goodness yawn

      Please register in order to view this content

      )
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       Both were decent sets that did not long long, at all.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy