Jump to content

Emmerdale: Discussion Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

 

Yes. 

 

When they don't write her as a romantic heroine I think Debbie can be an asset to the show. She was for a number of years. I think they just don't need to write her based on her love life or being some ideal mother. She worked best as an anti-heroine. 

 

She's been gone a year anyway so we got a break...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

 

She's just always been such a bore and a miserable little bitch.

 

Sorry, I just cannot stand her, and I resent that she and Belle have taken all limelight that should have been Victoria's. It's not surprising though since the Dingles have been the favoured ones and the few remaining Sugden have been treated like an afterthought, especially Victoria.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I was always pretty positive that they indeed purposely wrote the Merricks out. Not that I know too much about it, but I feel as though that era was all about disposing of the show's past and creating a "bigger, better" show, playing essentially into the notion that the "daytime" years were utter boring sh!t (which, of course, I disagree with - that's the Emmerdale I'm most interested in).

I was researching after watching the Sarah's death episode, and yes, Samuel Skilbeck should be on this show, in his early 30s. I hate it when shows randomly dig up old characters to bring back, but if these UK soaps can throw together a whole new family and put them on the frontburner right away, why not at least make the family an offshoot of established characters who once were the center of the show? It's a simple matter of continuity! Emmerdale Farm was not a show filled with babies, weddings, and funerals, so the few opportunities that are there to make connections between its past and its present should be exploited.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

And it was done very thoroughly too. In just over two years (May 1989-August 1991) the show lost Sandie Merrick, Jackie Merrick, Caroline Bates, Rev. Donald Hinton, Matt Skilbeck, Amos Brearly, Dolly Skilbeck, Sam Skilbeck and Henry Wilks. All long-running characters.

Caroline and Amos did make more appearances, but only in a recurring capacity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

The oddest part is the character who seemingly would have worked best in the newer format (Joe, given his longtime ties to Home Farm and business) never really worked that well. Maybe because Joe wasn't the same in his last years.

 

It still makes no sense to me just how much the show butchered so many Sugdens and people close to them. They're lucky to have even survived such a destructive mentality - if not for so many '90s characters being so compelling I don't think it would havel asted the decade. 

 

The episodes where Dolly realizes what scum the Tates are sort of gives the biggest blueprint of what the show would become. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You know, I never really thought about Joe that way, but you're absolutely right. He should have fit in to the "new" Emmerdale much more than he did. Certainly better than someone like Matt would have. In a way Matt embodies the "old" Emmerdale Farm, and he would have been very out of place on the show in the 90s. I will forever be grateful though that both he and Dolly made it out of Beckindale alive.

 

The first half of the 1990s was actually quite a good period. I think the show really started to lose its way in the middle of the decade. The growing number of Dingles that popped up didn't help, but I think the biggest sign of trouble was actually turning Kim into some kind of superbitch. Her coming back from the dead, watching Frank die, plotting to commit insurance fraud etc was so out of style for the show, and it opened the door for a whole new kind of stories that would have seem hopelessly out of place a few years earlier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

They aren't actually doing anything, although she kissed him while she was drunk and he was passed out. I do think the whole thing is silly and the actors deserve better, although I'll admit I laughed at various points, like when Nicola started tossing the toilet paper rolls. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I recognize that but something small always pans into something major. I'd just prefer they not have Bernice do that. I cherish her closeness with Nicola as it is one of the solid sibling relationships on this show. I'd hate for it to be severed b/c Bernice or Jimmy had the burning urge to screw one another.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I don't think it's going to go that far. I think it's just more breakup drama that always fades out. I just wish they'd let Nicola and Jimmy have a new story for once and let Bernice stop being so pathetic all the time. 

 

I did like the increased character interaction in this past few episodes, like Joanie and Zak with Aaron and Robert, Pollard with Robert, etc. And the scenes with Ronnie and Lawrence were touching. The only part that annoyed me was Lawrence berating David. I still haven't forgotten what Lawrence and his family did to Alicia and the Metcalfes, even if the show wants me to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Oh I haven't forgotten what Lachlan did to my precious Alicia either, hence why I wanted Diane to bludgeon his ass to death that day she threw a rock through the window. 

Please register in order to view this content

 

While I don't mind the Whites now, I still wanna see them all leave in bodybags eventually. 

 

I am over Bernice being pathetic too, which is why I don't even want them to entertain Jimmy/Bernice. As I've said numerous times, why not test out Dan and Bernice? I think they'd be hot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Lol.  Me neither.  CM is in really good shape so I shouldn't make fun especially with his health issues, but like the tips were the most basic thing ever.
    • I also think Joey will end up Ashley's father. Joey made a comment that Nicole's marriage falling apart was similar to him but without the illegitimate child. Or something like that. But I'm wondering if he used the word "illegitimate" to differentiate intentionally or maybe Jan had the baby without telling him just like Leslie claims with Ted and that was why she was acting weird with Leslie. Jan could have still been "honest with Ashley" by telling her what kind of person her father is without telling her specifically who he is.  This could be another "revelation" down the line MVJ set up to keep story momentum going. We are led to believe Ashley is such a "good girl" and it turns out she's Joey's daughter. Maybe she will turn and not be so "goody-goody". Etc...another story point to go down.  When Leslie said she still had more surprises and stormed off, my first thought was Eva isn't really hers. This would explain why Leslie is abandoning "her daughter" harshly with all the comments of how can she do that to her own daughter. Eva isn't her daughter she's Nicole's, so she couldn't care less about Eva. They keep going on about the DNA test...for her father...no one has ever checked to see if Leslie's DNA matches. They just assume. Why? Because Leslie said so? Maybe this ties into the theories people have that Leslie stole Eva from the hospital (since she's already proven she can sneak into hospitals as a nurse) and raised Nicole's daughter, keeping her away from the "happy couple" until she used her to destroy their happiness when she pleased. She could have done it because she wanted her own baby with Ted and it was the closest she thought she could get to having his child. Eva and Kat being twins and having that "psychic" connection Martin mentioned about Kat calling out Eva from the get-go. Just rambling...but I love this show much and how it has me interested in finding out.  Does anyone care who Alexandre Dumas is at this point? Does anyone care if Liam lives or dies? Just saying... lol
    • And hopefully, we’ll see it again soon

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Weights? Really? I would've never known!
    • Don't worry I recapped them on the thread for @Taoboi, so you can read them when you are interested.  Weights are good.  Crazy I hadn't heard that before

      Please register in order to view this content

    • As most rugby players are. WOOF!!!   FINALLY!!! And WORTH THE WAIT.    
    • I'm not saying he was right. I'm just saying he wasn't screaming. I hope we see him apologize on screen.
    • Incline walking Weights  Sprints. I just saved you that click on the article.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy