Jump to content

EastEnders: Discussion Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted (edited)

The New Years episodes were pretty good. The cinematography on the location shots were top notch and while I’m not big on Suki and Eve as a couple the wedding was actually fun and they got good drama out of Nish’s last stand. I was really hoping it’d be a two for one death special though

Please register in order to view this content

@Liberty City Of the Panesars I actually like Ravi, Priya and Avani so when they are the main ones centered for story as they were post fallout I’m a happy camper.

I really enjoyed Nish’s actor but they killed the character for me when they blew up him and Kat’s all too brief romance and kept rinse and repeating him trying to kill a family member and get disowned only to easily manipulate his way back into their good graces.

I will never find Suki likable for the same reasons @DRW50 listed and Eve only works for me with the Slater’s. Nugget and Vinny are complete punks as highlighted by how they let Nish run amok once again for his exit but I wish the show would let them lean more into being shady business scoundrels instead of whiny little weasels. If they all left the square abruptly I wouldn’t be sad at all.

Edited by detroitpiston
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

The New Years episodes were seemingly better than Christmas. I agree the cinematography/directing was top notch especially the aftermath episode. It’s unfortunate we don’t get this level of production with American soaps. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ravi Gulati & Suki Panesar are the only two I enjoy, if I am being honest. The others I could see leave, and not feel anything about it. Vinny Panesar is perhaps one I could see feeling something about if his character was shifted the tiniest of bits. But, other than that, I feel nothing towards the rest of 'em.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

The writing for both is terrible. I'd gladly choose "neither." More gimmicks to hide how hollow EE is now. It's nice to see Diane Parish showcased but none of this benefits Denise.

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It won't matter regardless because whoever the fandom chooses, the writers can easily undo it by Xmas by having her have an epiphany. I find both pairings to be toxic. For once, I'd like Denise to have a healthy relationship. I know I was in the minority back then, but I wish EE had not messed up Denise and Ian being a possible pairing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Compared to what has come after, it wouldn't have been a bad pairing - DTC seemed to go out of his way to trash them (and then gave Denise incredibly bad material with no followup, like having her become a drunk and abuse Patrick). 

Ian has been very poorly served since his return. He may as well not have come back. It says it all about how useful he is to the current team that his reaction for the Christmas episode was to rip off a scene a long-dead character had 40 years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I always thought Cindy and Ian being back together was stupid. It logically made no sense given how Cindy hired someone to kill Ian at one point. And Ian later took the kids from her and played a hand in her going to prison. If anything, they should be mortal enemies. From the clips I've seen, watching Ian be blind to Cindy was pathetic. I agree that I am stunned that Adam Woodyatt even returned. 

The only good thing that emerged out of Cindy's return was her hatred for Bobby. It held true to Cindy. 

And I said previously that this regime knocked off Pauline's death with Cindy's assault minus Cindy dying. Hell, didn't she fall in the same spot as Pauline? But this is why I say the UK soaps need to go back to kitchen sink drama. They have become too modern day Americanized by focusing heavily on murder, doom, and gloom. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think he must have just returned for the paycheck as he seemed happier when he was away from the show.

I've seen people defend the Ian smashup ripoff and Cindy falling in the snow ripoff because they represent the anniversary and history. That is something you can do in a fun video for fans, not on your big Christmas episode. It also has no real impact because the show is obsessed with ripping itself off anyway - what's different now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Agreed. 

I do think that AW enjoyed doing theatre and pantomine while not on EE. Sadly, that might not be enough to pay the bills. 

(re: Cindy's assault/Ian breakdown) Yes, it is hard to recreate the wheel; however, the attempt they tried to take fell flat. And there will be no longterm payoff for whoever assaulted Cindy. It'll be swept under the rug, and Cindy will spend all of this year plotting to get revenge. It'll be an endless cycle until someone (Cindy or the culprit) opts of leave the show, which is when someone will meet a grizzly demise, go to prison, or flee the Square. Rinse. Wash. Repeat. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I didn’t mind the recreated scenes tbh. Nice history references and they didn’t feel like the show was beating viewers over the head with them as some crowning achievement of the episodes either.

I also bought Ian and Cindy reuniting when they did. It had been decades, he’s always been a mug and she was in a bad place after having to leave George and the girls and finding out Lucy and Steven were dead. Getting back with Ian was a way to reclaim a life she never got to have. Of course she ended up remembering just how boring and unsatisfactory it was when she actually got it back and sabotaged it all.

I’m pulling for Jack and Denise for the viewers choice, they did good work repairing them for me with The Six fallout. This rekindling with Denise and Ravi however has rang false for me at every step. IDEK what they were trying to do with that scene of him confessing to her he killed Nish on purpose Monday but it didn’t work at all lol, Aaron Thiara has acting limits and that scene was a highlight for em. 

I did love the Nigel and Kathy reunion scenes and the Beales and Knight families having a go at each other at The Vic trying to pin down which one of them hit Cindy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

I just never bought the reunion because most of the time after the reunion took place offcamera and barely involved the kids. He blamed Denise for Amy's self-harm and told her she couldn't leave or Amy's fate would be on her. That's grotesque and was never dealt with because we're just supposed to accept Jack treating women like garbage. 

I can agree with you about Cindy and Ian, but that just makes the whole thing boring and pointless to me (especially since almost none was oncamera). The other issue here is that I think Michelle Collins actually has more chemistry with Adam Woodyatt than she does with Colin Salmon or Micah Balfour, and the show is so hesitant to pull the trigger on George/Cindy anyway. The whole thing was confusing and tell-don't-show and badly acted to boot.

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

That's my thing. It just felt like pure gimmickry, which used to be beneath EE. And yet I agree she and Adam Woodyatt still have considerable chemistry.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Thanks -- you're doing God's work The Gio reveal was everything I hoped for and more. GH got it right. Head to toe, GM is a stunning physical specimen.
    • I really wonder how they'll handle Netflix's usual long breaks between seasons. That girl is going to grow up fast... makes me wonder if this wouldn't have been a better fit for HBO Max considering they're leaning into a more broadcast style of production model with The Pitt.
    • I agree -- I didn't suspect Ted, either. I think a lot of people are giving themselves way too much credit in predicting Ted's problems

      Please register in order to view this content

      And can I have a different take on Ted here? Yes, he's made a huge mistake with this Leslie debacle, and yes, he has to suffer and pay for it. But does that make Ted a terrible human being? I don't think it does. He made a horrific mistake over 2 decades ago, and as far as we know, he's been a good husband and father since. As far as we know, he hasn't strayed or violated his marriage since. He didn't know that he fathered another child, and thought he "removed" Leslie from his life. I won't blame Nicole if she doesn't forgive him, but I also won't blame her if she decides what they have and what they've had more than makes up for what he did. Ted is getting dragged far more than Bill is on these boards, and I think Bill is MUCH worse as a husband and father. How many times did he cheat on Dani during their marriage? How many times did he do vile things in his role as fixer? How much did he hurt his daughters by screwing their friend and marrying her? With Keith Robinson coming in as Ted, maybe we'll see a character change in direction and we'll discover that Ted has many flaws and always had a dark side. For now, though, I'm inclined to both be angry with Ted for hurting his family while also sympathizing with him. I know what you mean, but I do think that was intentional. So much was going on in that episode, and I think they decided not to let Nicole's reaction be lost in all that. Nicole will get those scenes that you're asking for.  
    • That was the original point of me sending you her 6 airdates, so now with those, and the link to the daily episode guide I've provided, that should help you more easily find the additional Ruth Buzzi scenes. I will always repeat myself when it comes to defending my data that I've taken decades to research and compile. But, as you pointed out in a recent post, I am kind, so at least I will do it with you in a kind way as opposed to the usual social media way most people do with just getting rude/nasty. That's not my style, as you correctly pointed out earlier this week, and never will be.  So, all is well! 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Ambyr Michelle continues to be *that girl.* She’s just a star, period. Elevates every scene she’s in on the sheer strength of her emotional realism and charisma. Can sell any dialogue. I wish the show veered away from the B&B-style scripting. TMG/Leslie’s tirade stood out, I suppose, but she’s getting a bit mustache-twirly. And I wish DD had more to do in that episode than stand and sob.
    • Well, that was down to CBS being weak and not being willing to just pulling the plug entirely. They didn't want to commit to cancelling the show in case they needed it for their schedule basically; plus they kept showing that they were willing to make cuts if needed to be. 
    • I'm sorry but clearly what I've said is not satisfactory to you. I have now read what you have to say, twice. As it happens, my interest at this point is looking at other mislabeled files to find this other Ruth Buzzi content. I do not see any point to each of us repeating ourselves, so I will leave it here. 
    • It seemed to be your intent. coming into a thread I started and making multiple posts saying my data was wrong. In the next paragraph you say "Of course, I was suspicious from the very first instance where what I saw & heard did not agree with what it should have.  I'm very glad to know why." That certainly didn't stop you from immediately saying the data was wrong, until I provided additional receipts. Why did you not check the daily episode guide (for instance, this one for the 1980's) I posted for the world to see for exactly this reason...to help confirm airdates: http://daytimeroyaltyonline.com/days-daily-summaries-1980-1989-t15361.html? That is what you should be checking BEFORE you make any posts in the future like this, trying to suggest something from my data is incorrect. You could have also messaged me and asked me why your dates weren't adding up with what the correct data is. I would have fast forwarded through that video you posted, spotted Roman and Hope and immediately have told you that was the 11/1/83 episode.
    • Jason, just let me say that it was not my intent to any way impugn any of your data  or research. I'm very sorry if it came out that way. Obviously the person I got these 4 November episodes from has mislabeled files, multiples, which I was certainly unaware of.  When I am editing it is all about what I see & hear. Later, I find time for greater reflection.  Of course, I was suspicious from the very first instance where what I saw & heard did not agree with what it should have.  I'm very glad to know why.  If you find you are no longer interested in the edit, that is fine. I have no ego in this. I did it only to share it.
    • I feel like Vernon and Anita need to not be hypocrites and try and take the heat off Bill in this case. It's clear that the family used him as a fixer and especially knowing he helped with Martin's situation, they need to either be quiet or support him. BTW...with Vanessa being in the hospital for food poisoning, am I the only one who thought Shanice was gonna say she's pregnant or had an STD? The only reason I say STD is because she hasn't had any memorable sex partners, but I definitely don't believe she just had food poisoning.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy