Jump to content

AMC: Pratt's bible


Recommended Posts

  • Members

As far as Tad paying for his crimes, once again focus groups are to blame. When she exited AMC last time around, Cady McClain, in her blog, wrote about the whole Tad/Madden situation and how out of character it was for Tad, claiming that she was told that ABC's research showed that the viewers didn't really care if Tad was a killer. That's probably why they never followed up with any redemption story for Tad...no interest from their precious focus groups. These are also the same groups that didn't care if Tad and Kathy were reuinited, prompting Frons' comment last month that he was very surprised that "actual viewers" wanted this story to happen. JFP has said that ABC lives and dies by its focus groups, which is a shame, because these people aren't long-term viewers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

It's not that sonny shooting Carly is ok because Luke raped Laura te problem is that Luke and Sonny are the heroes of the show. To GH's credit, Luke and Lucky dealt with the rape issue beautifully in the 90s but Sonny and Jason are ALWAYS painted as morally superior.

Now take another story. Erica kidnapps baby Maddie. This is a story everyone hated BUT at least we had a clear sense of who the victims and villians were. Erica di it. There was no question that Erica was wrong, her actions were selfish and eventually this became clear to her, she went to jail and Maria NEVER forgave her. I think we were meant to understand Erica while still understanding her actions were dispicable. And it was very satifying, though I love Erica, to have seen her go to jail and Maria have the child returned.

Flash foward to Babe kidnapping Miranda. She was still saint Bab when it was all over and she and bianca: BFFs forever. The angle there was always well, Babe did a bad thing but she's a good gal and we should forgive her. Hey, Bianca did! Again, rather than letting the character's redepmtion take it's course naturally as Sinclair pointed out happened with Janet, the writers just threw in an all's well speech on Bianca's part and expected us to follow suit. I think had Babe gone to jail and had she become the town parriah for a while, there might have been some real growth for the character. Instead, she sleeps with Josh in a kiddie pool because JR was mean to her or something. Again, it's never Babe's fault and again,it's not characterization but manipulation. It's a huge problem in daytime this "training" of the viewers but AMC seems to have made it part of the local flavor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Tvguide.com has taken to putting up the print articles by Logan 1-2 weeks after they appear.

Last I checked, their most recent online posting was to announce that Cindy Lauper was appearing on ATWT. Since the print run of that story was in mid-June or earlier, I anticipate that the Pratt interview will appear online, but not till later in July.

Thus, a nice paraphrase of the source would be much appreciated, Detroitpistonfan :).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thank you! I like Army Wives (among other things, because the show features one my favourite writing teams - Elisa Zuritsky & Julie Rottenberg), but I don't like Pratt photocopying it. It might be good, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't mean to harp on something that we've steered away from (Army Wives?); however...

Many people will say that Tad has not paid for burying Madden alive. First of all, as Cady said, this was totally out of character for Tad, no matter how badly he wanted to find Kate. One of the things I can't stand about McT is that she could've had two intriguing murder mysteries (Who shot Michael?; Who buried Madden?) and because she didn't have the foresight (read: Balls) to think ahead, it ends up being two unlikely people (Oh well, poor Bianca just blacked out. "I decided along the way it had to be Tad.") So by no means take this as my endorsement of the actions or repercussions. However, by virtue of the previous posts in this thread, wasn't Tad "redeemed" by also making it his only tie to finding Kate...therefore losing her all over again. Seems to me this is justification along the lines of "breast cancer" and "miscarriages." Hm?

And as for the redemption of Babe mentioned above, I think selective memory is usually involved here. First of all, the real forgiveness by Bianca still didn't happen until Eden Reigel came back to the show once she left two years later. Although there were interspersed conversations here and there between the two characters, Bianca never said she forgave Babe for quite a while. Also, with the character off the canvas it was more difficult to play all the beats of this forgiveness. (I'm probably going to hell, as this post is starting to sound like I forgive McTavish--I don't). It was all rushed, with the whole idea of "If Bianca can forgive her, we can too," behind it. Not that it was perfect or justifiable, I just don't think the Crazy Internet Fan Base :P remembers certain events.

Plot in sacrifice of character sucks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I agree. Especially after SilkPress got back to her apartment and started to mock Nicole. Her dislike for Nicole and seeing her as a threat to her getting Teddy Bear is growing worse. So I could see her pulling a kidnapping on Nicole at some point. If anything she was going there to poke the bear and got pressed (pun unintended) when the bear gathered her.   Completely understandable. 
    • Beyond The Underwear Oops I mean Gates!

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I swear this entire time I thought Roman knew about the Phillip/Vivian letter lol.  I do like how mature Roman/Kate are as a couple.  It makes me sad the new writers never got a chance to write for John/Marlena. I agree with @AbcNbc247 that the Felicity stuff is a bit after school special-y.  I am pretty sure that (most) of the viewing audience is aware that a grown man should not be shouting at any teenage girl especially one with disabilities.  Just let Xander apologize and move on. Linsey Godfrey was in her Sarah baby voice mode today and it irritates me to no end.   I know it's a cutesy thing her and Xander do but it's annoying. Bringing Kevin back is strange, but I do like the use of history.  I do think Rex probably could have been used instead, but whatever.  I don't care about Rex much either lol.
    • I mean over the past decades. But I do agree that in recent years now, the writing is not working for them as well as it used to then. It's same old, same old...which is what made the Damian storyline refreshing. At least for me.   
    • Did Denise give any interviews where she talked about her first few years on GH... '73-75? I wonder if she had any regrets leaving Days for GH, as from what I've read, the show was in the dumps writing-wise, so am thinking she didn't have great story? Any Leslie story highlights I've seen always start with '76, after Gloria Monty took charge.
    • I know! It's like second verse, here we go again!  Agreed. Certainly there was concern maybe even fear at the highest levels for the very good reason that what they had was so economically successful, so of course this risk was scary but if anyone was brave she was. Yes, he was. I have seen her associated with getting it on the air one other place but no details nor official title. Not the writer or creator so it made me wonder if she functioned as a kind of uncredited ad hoc producer, but then maybe she just supported it. At any rate that is nothing but supposition on my part. No data! Yes, not a surprise anymore but still so frustrating! On one hand I am appreciative that she is included in this book, but scholarship where are you?!
    • that wasnt her point. She wanted to further demonize Ted; that was the main focus of their talk. She wants to ensure that Nicole leaves him so that he's free and single to be with her. At this point, I dont think she really cares what Nicole thinks of her; she just wants her out of the way Eva is Nicole's stepdaughter and is a Dupree by association. If Nicole takes Ted back then its reasonable that she would accept his daughter and i that happens, Eva will have welcomed to their country club, be invited to their parties, have access to their resources, etc....much like Andre whom also isnt a blood Dupree but is accepted by them via Nicole. Eva got what she got from Anita bc of Hayley. I think its important to remember that context bc they just dealt with an interloper that infiltrated their ranks and hurt her daughter in the worse way. Now you have another unfortunate girl positioned to do the same to her other daughter. The feelings are still too fresh and she doesnt want Eva to get the idea that she would ever be allowed the opportunity to play them again
    • Oh I've seem this! That's part of why I'm curious! The show could put EastEnders to shame on the gangster Aspect! Oh I've seem this! That's part of why I'm curious! The show could put EastEnders to shame on the gangster Aspect!
    • Eve was one of those characters that had the "Jessie Brewer"role. They had heavy storyline, they burned through it and now they are there for support and a touchstone in the community (Marland wanted to give Jessie story, but I agree with Monty...she best served in her connecting role, and keeping that damn Amy Vining busy so she keeps her nose out of things) So charcters are important and why they should have kept characters like Bridget around (even as she is more volatiles then Eve) who didnt need a big storyline but could have been behind the bar making connections and expostion, but Rauch wanted JEVA/JEVA/JEVA and DRAMA (which to him meant a lot of yelling and stupidity.)
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy