Jump to content

Can B&B Survive without Susan Flannery?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Can and Will Surivive.

B&B will be forced to evolve without Flannery. The mistake would be to phase out John McCook...Stephanie Forrester should be like Phillip Chancellor II on Y&R: the start of a lifetime conflict (one between Ridge and Thorne would be good). I don't know how she'll be written out but if I was at the writer's meetings that's what I'd pitch. Her exit should be monumental but also something that triggers a whole new direction for the show because that's what it's going to take to keep the momentum going.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I think B&B is showing signs of that evolution now. The cast is slowly inflating with more of Brooke's family, be them Forresters or Logans. It is especially prevalent with the current cast photo which has Brooke front and center, and Steph in the corner, almost an after thought.

I think the transition will cause a few major cast changes including Flannery. I can see Winsor Harmon off campus soon. I think Lesli's airtime on Y&R is her only chance of continuing as Felicia. I also think Taylor will be an after thought soon as well.

I hope they give Flannery a great exit storyline, something big a dramatic, something very Stephanie. How about some sort of cancer that gives her only a year to live? In that year, she will try her hardest to make things the way she wants it: Ridge with Taylor, her back with Eric, Brooke out of everyone's lives, etc... but the harder she tries to fix, things, the more screwed up they become.

I would love Stephanie to die not at peace, but still very much restless. She would have a grand epilogue to deliver as the final part of B&B's first chapter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it will be okay, but the show will take a huge loss.

Honestly, people watch for what they watch for. If they want to watching for a particular actor/actress/character/couple, then they should, obviously then if they're only watching for a certain thing, then the show must not be giving them much else to WANT to watch......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes this is exactly what the show should do. It should ste off conflicts between all characters. brooke and the forresters could battle for ownership of fc. ridge and thorne could battle for ceo. felicia and ridge should battle over head designer duties at fc.

and stephanie definitely should be killed off. i don't think a major character like steph should be written off in a lame "she goes to europe" storyline. steph has always been so involved, so for her to just up and leave would not make sense.

i think the "who shot steph" storyline should've been reserved for la flannery's exit of the show. a murder mystery could be drawn out for years. the first time steph was shot, it had not dramatic effect, because everyone knew la flannery wasn't leaving.

and if stephen and nick were somehow responsible for steph's death, then it could hinder ridge/brooke romance, reignite eric/ ridge/thorne/felicia vs. nick, create a brooke vs. felicia rivalry and reignite the logan vs. forrester feud with rick, bridget, hope and ridge jr. caught in the corssfire.

also, beefing up ashley and felicia as worthy adversaries to brooke would be a good move. brooke meddling in her children's lives and brooke becoming more of a corporate biotch at fc would be good moves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Is the show starting to diminish Stephanie's role already?

You know, I bet this wouldn't even be happening if Bell hadn't turned Stephanie into a carricature. :( The only reason the character works is because of La Flannery and the poor woman has to work hard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I have very detailed synopses of all 1976 storylines for the soaps from the Daytime Serial Newsletter. Please let me know if you are interested in a particular show and I will post it in the appropriate thread. As I stated they are very detailed, so I don't want to clutter up threads if posters are not interested.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Surely we (and Billy Flynn) are not going to be saddled with a character named Aristotle Dumas? This isn't 1970's Edge of Night.
    • What annoys me a little bit about the "day players" is they sound a bit too "Brooklyn-ish" sometimes.  Obviously, the show was taped in New York City, and the actors are all New York actors, but Monticello is supposed to be located in Illinois or Ohio.  Occasionally, they grab actors and actresses for small roles who have VERY distinct New York accents, which contrasts sharply with the main cast, none of whom have noticeable accents (except for our dashing European gigolo, Eliot Dorn, of course).  The heavy Brooklyn accent works fine if the character is a bookie, or the owner of a pawn shop, or a guy who's selling stolen guns on the street corner.  But when it's a steadily recurring character -- such as the first Mrs. Goodman, who worked for Miles and Nicole -- it's pretty jarring to me sometimes.  And you'll see it often -- such as an "under-five" character who witnesses a car accident, or a character who witnesses a shooting, or the occasional desk clerk, or waiter.  
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I'm screaming at those clips and gifs.  THIS IS PURE GOLD.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That's always been my thought. I can't imagine that the show would play up the unseen AD so far in advance without them casting a *star*. After today's episode, I wonder if he'll somehow be connected with Diane. It was strange that Diane mentioned her very distant family today. I can't recall Diane ever talking about her backstory. Maybe he's her much younger brother?  It's also possible he's connected to Diane during her time in LA. Sally's already said she crossed paths with him. OC, I think Dumas is Mariah's mistake.... As a side note, it was good to see some mixing it up - Adam with Clare/Kyle and Sharon with Tessa.
    • Here's the place to share some memorable criticism. You don't have to agree with it, of course (that's often where the fun starts). Like I mentioned to @DRW50, Sally Field was a favorite punching bag in the late '80s and early '90s.   Punchline (the 1988 movie where she and Tom Hanks are stand ups): "It's impossible to tell the difference between Miss Field's routines that are supposed to be awful, and the awful ones that are supposed to be funny." -- Vincent Canby, New York Times. "It's not merely that Field is miscast; she's miscast in a role that leaves no other resource available to her except her lovability. And (David) Seltzer's script forces her to peddle it shamelessly." -- Hal Hinson, Washington Post. "As a woman who can't tell a joke, Sally Field is certainly convincing. ... Field has become an unendurable performer ... She seems to be begging the audience not to punch her. Which, of course, is the worst kind of bullying from an actor. ... She's certainly nothing like the great housewife-comedian Roseanne Barr, who is a tough, uninhibited performer. Sally Field's pandering kind of 'heart' couldn't be further from the spirit of comedy." -- David Denby, New York   Steel Magnolias: The leading ladies: Dolly Parton: "She is one of the sunniest and most natural of actresses," Roger Ebert wrote. Imagining that she probably saw Truvy as an against-type role, Hinson concluded it's still well within her wheelhouse. "She's just wearing fewer rhinestones." Sally Field: "Field, as always, is a lead ball in the middle of the movie," according to Denby . M'Lynn giving her kidney to Shelby brought out David's bitchy side. "I can think of a lot more Sally Field organs that could be sacrificed." Shirley MacLaine: "(She) attacks her part with the ferociousness of a pit bull," Hinson wrote. "The performance is so manic that you think she must be taking off-camera slugs of Jolt." (I agree. If there was anyone playing to the cheap seats in this movie, it's Shirley.) Olympia Dukakis: "Excruciating, sitting on her southern accent as if each obvious sarcasm was dazzlingly witty," Denby wrote. Daryl Hannah: "Miss Hannah's performance is difficult to judge," according to Canby, which seems to suggest he took a genuine "if you can't say something nice ..." approach. Julia Roberts: "(She acts) with the kind of mega-intensity the camera cannot always absorb," Canby wrote. That comment is so fascinating in light of the nearly 40 years Julia has spent as a Movie Star. She is big. It's the audience who had to play catch up. And on that drag-ish note ... The movie itself: "You feel as if you have been airlifted onto some horrible planet of female impersonators," Hinson wrote. Canby: "Is one supposed to laugh at these women, or with them? It's difficult to tell." Every review I read acknowledged the less than naturalistic dialogue in ways both complimentary (Ebert loved the way the women talked) and cutting (Harling wrote too much exposition, repeating himself like a teenager telling a story, Denby wrote). Harling wrote with sincerity and passion, Canby acknowledged, but it's still a work of "bitchiness and greeting card truisms." The ending was less likely to inspire feeling good as it was feeling relieved, according to Denby. "(It's) as if a group of overbearing, self-absorbed, but impeccable mediocre people at last exit from the house."
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy