Jump to content

Amy Winehouse & The Grammys


JackPeyton

Recommended Posts

  • Members

So, recently some people have been in an uproar about Amy Winehouse winnign the gramms. Now lets put aside if she should have won or not based on ig you like her or not, and lets discuss if she should have won or not based on her personal life. Some people have been saying that she should not be rewarded because shes in rehab and has a drug problem. So what do you think?

I personally think she should have won. The grammys are not given out based on personal life, nor should they be.

what do you think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Amy Winehouse is a great singer and songwritter and whether she is a drug addict or if anyone is for that matter shouldn't be considered when giving out awards. Only the damned talent. I think Amy is on her way to recovery. She did wonderfully on the Grammys. In fact her performances was one of my faves of the night. This year's Grammys was awesome and the best Grammys in quite awhile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I actually think that she won BECAUSE she is such a tabloid headliner. Not inspite of it. Quite honestly I can't believe that she swept the grammy's and won all of those awards. "Rehab" is not so great to win both Record and Song of the Year. It's laughable that it did. But then again anything that doesn't let the public vote on musical quality is always iffy with me. I also think it's insane that Milli Vanilli won several grammy's their first year while Madonna had to wait 15-16 years before she was awarded just one especially when alot of the artists that won those awards in her category won it making the music she defined from her very first album.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • John Black actually was the ultimate good guy soap hero. So I don’t mind the town gushing over him. It’s deserved.
    • Be glad it wasn't a Perry production. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I love my girl, but nope he's pathetic. 250K and now he's put her business at risk.   L O S E R    

      Please register in order to view this content

    • The whole town gushing over John Black as if he was a saint is eye rolling.  I guess death really colors people's memories over his many flaws, but I guess that is normal and human nature. I'm still confused as to why Leo hasn't been written out.  The actor stank up two soaps with his sub par acting, what does he have on TPTB's to remain on these soaps.   What's the point of Cat?  I hope the new head-writers figure out her purpose and develop her character. And I much prefer scenes not focusing on John's death because life does go on for the world when someone passes.  
    • Wasn't there a break in Zaslow's first run? I thought Roger was off-screen for a while, and when Zas came back, Roger was hiding at the boarding house and Nola figured out there was something hinkey about him. I'm pretty sure Simon chose to leave the first time and was replaced by RVV. I don't want to assume Jordan's issues played a role in his first departure, but Maeve said in an interview that at some point, it became very hard for her to work with him and she asked to work with him less. That seems to fit 1986, where suddenly Vanessa is essentially Ross' law clerk and not at every Lewis family moment.
    • He needs to divorce her arse with her constant cheating.   She's no better than Doug... she's F*cking pathetic.
    • I didn't know of any interruptions for Maeve Kinkead after her 1997 return. Her runs would then be 1981-1987, 1989-1996, 1997-2000, short arcs until the end. I knew Maureen Garrett second run was interrupted from a 2009 interview but I couldn't recall the exact year. Her runs would then be 1976-1980, 1988-2000, short arcs until the end.
    • As I said in May, I have no problem with Martin and Bradley being married. You can still do all the fun introloper storylines with them as you do everyone else. Both men of a certain age, and it is very believable for them to have either a first love or have been previously married. And, you can do it without either of them cheating!  

      Please register in order to view this content

       I said something similar during the premiere week. Bill was the perfect age to play Martin as Vernon and Anita's child. I would've much preferred this version, but oh well.
    • I don't know how you want to count Maeve. She "retired" in '00, but would come back for appearances. I don't know however if she made an appearance in '01 or '03. In '02 I believe she came back for Josh and Reva's wedding. I assume she came back when Gina Tognoni took over the role of Dinah. And I know she was back for Ross' memorial service. Maureen Garrett was around until at least '00. I don't think Holly was in town when Ben returned though. I just got pissed off about Jerry all over again.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy