Jump to content

Amy Winehouse & The Grammys


JackPeyton

Recommended Posts

  • Members

So, recently some people have been in an uproar about Amy Winehouse winnign the gramms. Now lets put aside if she should have won or not based on ig you like her or not, and lets discuss if she should have won or not based on her personal life. Some people have been saying that she should not be rewarded because shes in rehab and has a drug problem. So what do you think?

I personally think she should have won. The grammys are not given out based on personal life, nor should they be.

what do you think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Amy Winehouse is a great singer and songwritter and whether she is a drug addict or if anyone is for that matter shouldn't be considered when giving out awards. Only the damned talent. I think Amy is on her way to recovery. She did wonderfully on the Grammys. In fact her performances was one of my faves of the night. This year's Grammys was awesome and the best Grammys in quite awhile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I actually think that she won BECAUSE she is such a tabloid headliner. Not inspite of it. Quite honestly I can't believe that she swept the grammy's and won all of those awards. "Rehab" is not so great to win both Record and Song of the Year. It's laughable that it did. But then again anything that doesn't let the public vote on musical quality is always iffy with me. I also think it's insane that Milli Vanilli won several grammy's their first year while Madonna had to wait 15-16 years before she was awarded just one especially when alot of the artists that won those awards in her category won it making the music she defined from her very first album.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Randy (Doug's friend who works for Joey) -- Joey told Randy weeks ago that Joey's plan was to get Doug into so much debt that Doug would be forced to get Vanessa's real estate holding turned over to Joey, to use for money-laundering.  That's been the plan all along, which the viewers knew.  The only thing new is that Joey finally told Doug this. I think Joey is written badly.  I also think Jon Lindstrom is doing "Now I am going to act menacing".   But I don't really feel the menace.  It's too overdramatic and it doesn't feel like a real person.  Jon is a fine actor on GH, so I don't know what's happening here -- the entire BTG mobster premise is badly designed/written.  I don't know if Guza pushed for a mobster storyline?  Or did Jon?  (Jon wrote a novel about Hollywood mobsters). It just doesn't fit.  It feels (to me) like this storyline for Jon was just shoved onto the canvas but it doesn't fit all all. Monday's scene of Mona coming into the "casino" to check up on where Leslie supposedly lost money in the slot machines -- and Randy explaining to Mona that there are no slot machines, there is nothing but the card room.  I had to laugh because they had characters comment that it's just a card room and not a casino.  I had to laugh that the show is now acknowledging that there's nothing there.  Or if they are going to do this, then have it make sense for Fairmont Crest residents to visit a high-end glamourous casino, and not a random room with one table. So what money is Joey laundering? A while back, Joey told Vanessa that he knows about her sexual philandering because owns the escort service that she'd been using. But I don't care...  I'd just prefer that the entire mobster storyline go away. 
    • I caught up this past weekend. The show is better written, but I have been bored with the show. I did notice it ranked in the top 5 again this week, so that's a good sign.
    • I can't take this show seriously. I truly miss WJB writing this show. Bradley didn't inherit his dad's talent.
    • Maybe if there had been a good close up or two
    • I haven't had a chance to view the interview, but I'm glad Mike didn't get the part of Derek.  Derek is a badly written character. Any Ben Gavin screenshot from yesterday's show?
    • Wait, what? So, Martin’s not running for President anymore? Just like that?  I didn’t expect this storyline to be long term but I would’ve liked to see it play out for a little while longer, or at least until Martin’s secret was revealed. And definitely not fade out with a whimper. Sort of like Naomi’s lawsuit against Bill’s firm; what was the point of it all if it was just gonna wrapped up so easily and (probably) forgotten about?  Eva is still the breakout character though. I’m looking forward to seeing where she goes from here with everyone, especially if the twist that we’re all suspecting turns out to be true.  And I did find the gambling storyline interesting finally, now that we know Joey’s endgame. I’d like to see it play out and to see what happens to everybody involved in it.  As for Derek/Ashley… I wonder how it would’ve played out if they actually had cast Mike Manning as Derek. Yeah, the writing isn’t there but I imagine that Derek would have more of a personality lol and I also imagine that it would’ve made Ron Carlivati’s head explode

      Please register in order to view this content

      Ben Gavin did look hot though 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • That would've been a good pick! She was great on B&B and like you said, she's already in Atlanta.
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Oooo. I like the current actress, but that's a pretty great choice.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy