Jump to content
Email System Update

Days: If Stefano Is The Seventh Son Of The Seventh Son.....

Roman

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Roman Apprentice

Roman

Posted
  • Author
  • Members
Posted

Stefano has said that he is the seventh son of the seventh son, which meant that he would not die.

If John is his now half-brother, which he always knew and never said one damn word about, then what does that make Stefano?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Administrator
Toups Mentor

Toups

Posted
  • Administrator
Posted

Did he say that in the 80's because I don't remember him saying that ever since he came back in 1993.

Stefano would still be the seventh son because John is his younger brother. Also, Colleen said that Stefano never knew that John was his half-bro - I wish that weren't true though because it would make more sense if Stefano DID know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Members
Roman Apprentice

Roman

Posted
  • Author
  • Members
Posted

Yes. Stefano did say that back in the 80s, when I was watching.

And......I personally think this whole story is horseshit. Stefano knows everything about everyone......but now The Hack wants us to believe that he didn't know one thing about John being his brother....

After Colleen recognized a man that supposedly had extensive plastic surgery.

Makes sense to me.....

NOT!

Thanks, Queen, for confirming that. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Members
daysfan Newbie

daysfan

Posted
  • Members
Posted

Stefano, according to history, is the seventh son of the seventh son, which is why he is the Phoenix and none of his other brothers are. Santo is also, supposedly, a seventh son as well.

John would be the eighth son of the seventh son, so I don't know what that means for him. Maybe if Stefano fails, the DiMera Empire is passed on to the next son? Whatever the case, Stefano is still the seventh son of the seventh son....I think, because didn't the Santeen saga imply that Stefano was Santo's only son or something at the time(which wouldn't make a lick of sense due to the whole seventh son business and the fact that Andre is SOMEBODY's son)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Members
brimike Newbie

brimike

Posted
  • Members
Posted

Clearly, these are all facts they're hoping we've forgotten.

And for the record, while there's been some stellar stuff this week, I'll never forgive them for not including Stefano, EJ and Sami in the Ireland finale. That's just a travesty, especially after the last year.

There's more story to tell here. And we'll never see it.

GRRRRRRRRRRR.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Members
brimike Newbie

brimike

Posted
  • Members
Posted

And wouldn't it make sense that Stefano would want the only other (immediate) heir to the DiMera empire to be removed from the picture, believing he's somebody else? Why else would he torture John for so many years? Erase so many of his memories? Because he never wants John (and in turn, Brady, Belle and Claire) to lay any claim on what's his! (Especially if Stefano's older six siblings have since died)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • jmgaw
      Another World Discussion Thread

      By jmgaw · Posted

      Yes, I am familiar with Fred Silverman. Agree, the 90 minute AW a very poor decision by Silverman. I think Silverman was behind the decision to go with Texas.
    • ranger1rg
      Daily Hotness

      By ranger1rg · Posted

      Thanks -- you're doing God's work The Gio reveal was everything I hoped for and more. GH got it right. Head to toe, GM is a stunning physical specimen.
    • te.
      Little House On The Prairie 50th Anniversary

      By te. · Posted

      I really wonder how they'll handle Netflix's usual long breaks between seasons. That girl is going to grow up fast... makes me wonder if this wouldn't have been a better fit for HBO Max considering they're leaning into a more broadcast style of production model with The Pitt.
    • ranger1rg
      BTG: May 2025 Discussion Thread

      By ranger1rg · Posted

      I agree -- I didn't suspect Ted, either. I think a lot of people are giving themselves way too much credit in predicting Ted's problems

      Please register in order to view this content

      And can I have a different take on Ted here? Yes, he's made a huge mistake with this Leslie debacle, and yes, he has to suffer and pay for it. But does that make Ted a terrible human being? I don't think it does. He made a horrific mistake over 2 decades ago, and as far as we know, he's been a good husband and father since. As far as we know, he hasn't strayed or violated his marriage since. He didn't know that he fathered another child, and thought he "removed" Leslie from his life. I won't blame Nicole if she doesn't forgive him, but I also won't blame her if she decides what they have and what they've had more than makes up for what he did. Ted is getting dragged far more than Bill is on these boards, and I think Bill is MUCH worse as a husband and father. How many times did he cheat on Dani during their marriage? How many times did he do vile things in his role as fixer? How much did he hurt his daughters by screwing their friend and marrying her? With Keith Robinson coming in as Ted, maybe we'll see a character change in direction and we'll discover that Ted has many flaws and always had a dark side. For now, though, I'm inclined to both be angry with Ted for hurting his family while also sympathizing with him. I know what you mean, but I do think that was intentional. So much was going on in that episode, and I think they decided not to let Nicole's reaction be lost in all that. Nicole will get those scenes that you're asking for.  
    • JAS0N47
      In Loving Memory: Ruth Buzzi (Letitia Bradford, Days, 1983)

      By JAS0N47 · Posted

      That was the original point of me sending you her 6 airdates, so now with those, and the link to the daily episode guide I've provided, that should help you more easily find the additional Ruth Buzzi scenes. I will always repeat myself when it comes to defending my data that I've taken decades to research and compile. But, as you pointed out in a recent post, I am kind, so at least I will do it with you in a kind way as opposed to the usual social media way most people do with just getting rude/nasty. That's not my style, as you correctly pointed out earlier this week, and never will be.  So, all is well! 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Faulkner
      BTG: May 2025 Discussion Thread

      By Faulkner · Posted

      Ambyr Michelle continues to be *that girl.* She’s just a star, period. Elevates every scene she’s in on the sheer strength of her emotional realism and charisma. Can sell any dialogue. I wish the show veered away from the B&B-style scripting. TMG/Leslie’s tirade stood out, I suppose, but she’s getting a bit mustache-twirly. And I wish DD had more to do in that episode than stand and sob.
    • te.
      Ratings from the 1990s

      By te. · Posted

      Well, that was down to CBS being weak and not being willing to just pulling the plug entirely. They didn't want to commit to cancelling the show in case they needed it for their schedule basically; plus they kept showing that they were willing to make cuts if needed to be. 
    • Contessa Donatella
      In Loving Memory: Ruth Buzzi (Letitia Bradford, Days, 1983)

      By Contessa Donatella · Posted

      I'm sorry but clearly what I've said is not satisfactory to you. I have now read what you have to say, twice. As it happens, my interest at this point is looking at other mislabeled files to find this other Ruth Buzzi content. I do not see any point to each of us repeating ourselves, so I will leave it here. 
    • JAS0N47
      In Loving Memory: Ruth Buzzi (Letitia Bradford, Days, 1983)

      By JAS0N47 · Posted

      It seemed to be your intent. coming into a thread I started and making multiple posts saying my data was wrong. In the next paragraph you say "Of course, I was suspicious from the very first instance where what I saw & heard did not agree with what it should have.  I'm very glad to know why." That certainly didn't stop you from immediately saying the data was wrong, until I provided additional receipts. Why did you not check the daily episode guide (for instance, this one for the 1980's) I posted for the world to see for exactly this reason...to help confirm airdates: http://daytimeroyaltyonline.com/days-daily-summaries-1980-1989-t15361.html? That is what you should be checking BEFORE you make any posts in the future like this, trying to suggest something from my data is incorrect. You could have also messaged me and asked me why your dates weren't adding up with what the correct data is. I would have fast forwarded through that video you posted, spotted Roman and Hope and immediately have told you that was the 11/1/83 episode.
    • Contessa Donatella
      In Loving Memory: Ruth Buzzi (Letitia Bradford, Days, 1983)

      By Contessa Donatella · Posted

      Jason, just let me say that it was not my intent to any way impugn any of your data  or research. I'm very sorry if it came out that way. Obviously the person I got these 4 November episodes from has mislabeled files, multiples, which I was certainly unaware of.  When I am editing it is all about what I see & hear. Later, I find time for greater reflection.  Of course, I was suspicious from the very first instance where what I saw & heard did not agree with what it should have.  I'm very glad to know why.  If you find you are no longer interested in the edit, that is fine. I have no ego in this. I did it only to share it.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

  I accept