Jump to content

Barack Obama Elected President!


Max

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 8.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

And now, back to something substansive, instead of talking about birth certificate bullshit:

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/...e-for-congress/

Democrats widen lead in battle for Congress

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/...-palin-meeting/

McCain camp tries to keep reporters out of Palin meetings

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/...-tax-loopholes/

Ad Biden called 'terrible' only ran six times

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/...-ran-six-times/

Ad Biden called 'terrible' only ran six times

It shouldn't have ran once, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'll go a little further with you on this because I'm having one of those days where I can dabble in the exremely insignifcant stuff.

I think the birth certificate aspect has been debunked. The burden of proof is on the plaintiff and from what you have posted, it does not sound as if he has any solid proof that Obama was not born in Honolulu, Hawaii.

Besides the school registration (which is not proof) what proof exists that Obama was adopted by his stepfather? What proof exists that Obama's mother obtained Indonesian citizenship for him? What proof exists that Barack Obama's name was legally changed? What are the requirements for registration in the school he attended in Indonesia? And if you cannot prove that Obama wasn't born in the U.S., how do you know whether or not he has dual citizenship?

If McCain were scheduled to testify in the same type of friviolous lawsuit, what would make it news and why would McCain need to testify anyway? Anyone can file a lawsuit against you and you are required to file an answer within a specified period of time. A lawsuit doesn't make anything factual. The reason no one sees this as a legitimate issue is not the lawsuit but the basis for it. If there were something to it then it would receive media coverage and then it would be masquerading as an issue. Now it's nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The Obama isn't an American thing is just total garbage.

You know the ad that Biden criticized was garbage. Several of us said that. Of course, many of McCain's ads have been garbage and the McCain garbage has been far stinker than an ad making fun of McCain because he can't use the internet. I'm glad Obama has fought back, but I'm ready now for him to return to the issues, The nasty ads are backfiring on McCain in my opinion, and I think they are going to start backfiring on Obama too.

As far as Biden saying it, on the one hand I think it proves that Biden is a loose cannon and I really wish he would know the difference between what belongs on television and what would be better kept at the kitchen table. I guess it is a little refreshing that Obama does trust Biden enough to not put him on a leash. On the other hand, Biden should really be more disciplined. Obviously the fact that the ad only ran six times reflects that the campaign leaders probably backed off of it as quick as it appeared.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree with everything you have written here, Jess.

I would add that it isn't just Biden that is undisciplined, though... I think the Obama campaign is stumbling big time. And I think that some dark days are ahead for the campaign. I just have this feeling that there is some dirt out there and someone has it, ready to drop it in October...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'll make this my last comment on this subject, because it seems everyone is in agreement that this is bullshit or insignificant..

I don't know what the exact proof is that Berg plans to stipulate in court.

You're right in that the burden of proof is on the plantiff, and evidently the judge seeing this case felt that the evidence was measurable enough to constitute a trial. The judge does have the authority to deny any motions or requests for trial.

You're probably right. As I said before, I don't know what to believe yet. I think time will tell.

False accusations or not, I am still interested in Obama's testimony and the judgement...This could erupt into a huge story if the judge wants to become famous...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Roman, I think you may have missed the posts I made earlier in the day today..I posted an article that covered the financial crisis, and the Democrat's connection.

What are your thoughts on that topic?

I dont want to be included with the "those that can only push..the black man is not American" crowd..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can only assume this post is talking about me, since it addresses all of the items I addressed in a previous post. If not, I apologize.

Tone is so hard to "read" on a message board. The "we" talking about same sex marriage and abortion is "we," as a nation, not "we" on this chatboard. For the most part, I think we stay out of the muck here. However, in the public at large, people are voting on items that are inconsequential in the long run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

"I think we're going to be up very late counting votes," Sen. Joe Biden, D-Del., told a kettle of lawyers Tuesday night at a fundraiser for the Democratic Victory Fund hosted by the American Association of Justice in Washington, D.C. "And so, your help means a big deal. The last help we need you for, is you're the best legal minds in the country. We're going to need you going into election time, because we're going to mobilize thousands of lawyers to make sure they don't steal another election."

"He has never, never, never, never, never, never, never shared the values set that you share," Biden said. "He's an honorable, decent man, but John McCain truly believes, truly believes that you are corporate America's problem," he said to the trial lawyers. "And thank God you are."

Biden said that he's "done more than any other senator combined" for trial lawyers.

"There are two people -- you've heard me say it before -- two groups that stand between us and the barbarians at the gate," Biden said. "It's you and organized labor. That's it. That is it. So, mark my words, mark my words, if we lose this election, you are going to continue to see a continuation of the onslaught on everything we care about. For real. For real. So, I'm not only thanking you for your help. I would think you're all absolutely brain-dead if you didn't help. And I mean it."

>>sigh<< OMG, will somebody shut this jackass up already!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

biden-goal.jpg

Joe Biden continued his one-man Gaffemaster routine last night while being interviewed by Katie Couric at CBS. He attempted to discuss real leadership in the face of financial catastrophe, and reached back to the brilliant example of FDR and his televised speeches during the 1929 stock-market crash.

“When the stock market crashed, Franklin Roosevelt got on the television and didn’t just talk about the princes of greed,” Biden told Couric. “He said, ‘Look, here’s what happened.’”

How ignorant is this statement? Let me count the ways:

Franklin Roosevelt didn’t become president in 1929 during the crash. He won the 1932 election and took office in 1933, largely because of the 1929 crash and the incompetent protectionist policies that transformed it into a Great Depression.

If FDR and President Herbert Hoover didn’t talk about the “princes of greed” in 1929, by the time FDR took over, that kind of populist rhetoric had certainly taken root. FDR greatly escalated the scope of federal government to institute the kind of redistributionism that Obama and Biden now champion.

If Hoover or FDR appeared on television in 1929 or even 1933, only a few hundred people would have seen it. Television was still an experimental medium and wouldn’t be introduced to the public for at least another decade.

http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/23/bide...the-1929-crash/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Then.....

1. Why did you push that BS as hard as you did?

2. I have posted, in several posts, that the Repubs. AND Dems are to blame for this. Maybe you were alittle busy and didn't see that. :)

And who do YOU feel is to blame for this?

Please answer that question for me. Thanks. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • You are going to be so proud of me because I agree.  I kept thinking why is Sonny/Mo getting all the dialogue and gate keeping everyone's feelings when there are 3 other capable actors in these scenes?  Ned should have told Sonny to shut up lol. I am fine with Sonny getting a reaction, but he got 90% of the airtime for his reaction.  I don't even think it's mental health that's keeping his job.  MB wouldn't get this much time on screen if it was a pity thing.  Frank is too afraid to cut Sonny because of fan reaction.  I know there aren't any Sonny fans here, but I do think there are Sonny fans out there (besides me) lol.
    • I've been looking at the ratings during and after each head writer switch.  The ratings during Marcus' tenure (Oct 74 to April 75) were very good but at first not quite as high a Upton's (who was there six months prior. Marcus left when Mary Hartman was picked up as she was a creator and head writer). I've watched Marcus' interviews on Youtube; she discusses most of the soaps she worked on. She liked the money; she's not all warm and fuzzy about writing for them. She loved nighttime genres that gave her writing more flexibility than soapy dramas. But she was good at writing soaps.  By April 75, SFT was no.2 in the ratings behind ATWT. O'Shea was next (lasted 18 months) and in May 75, SFT high No. 1. When O'Shea left the show as still in the top five. O'Shea moved to OLTL in 77? but not as head writer so not sure why she left SFT. The Corringtons were the safest bet to keep long term. They needed to change direction by 1980 as the ratings were  dropping but still very solid 6s/low 20s share). They should have expanded the show to an hour and given the Corringtons some direction and more budget. One has to wonder about two people who were with the show for a long time: Mary Ellis Bunim was promoted to EP when she was about 28, amazingly and a woman! She as talented but she went through at 11 head writer changes if she started in 1974.  Here's her list of writers: Theodore Apstein (January 1974 – May 1974) 5 mo Gabrielle Upton (May 1974 – November 1974) 6 mo Ann Marcus (October 1974 - April 1975) 6 mo Peggy O’Shea (April 1975 – November 1976) 18 mo Irving Elman (with James Lipton) (November 1976 – Summer 1977) 9 mo Robert J. Shaw with Charles/Patti Dizenzo (August 1977 - Spring 78) 6-9 mo? Henry Slesar (Spring 78 to August 78) 3-4 mo? Corringtons (August 1978 to May 1980) 1 yr/9mo Linda Grover/John Porterfield (May 1980 to mid July 1980) 3 mo. Gabrielle Upton (July 1980 to at least through March or April) Harding Lemay April to June 81 writers' strike Don Chastain (Summer 1981 writers' strike - replaced by Ellis/Hunt Dec 81 or Jan 82) Then Fred Bartholemew comes in when Bunim goes to ATWT (Oct 81?) and he brings in Ellis Hunt for the NBC switchover, they lasted 11 months. Mary Stuart is the other mystery to me: how was she to work with? Did she instigate many of the writer firings? Was she not involved at all. No other P&G show went through this kind of frenetic change. (The Doctors might be a close second but wasn't on as long and not P&G).
    • I'm getting the sense that something happened between Anita and Dante Green that wasn’t exactly copacetic, to say the least. I wonder — did he promise her fame and fortune as a solo artist, and then attack her when she rebuffed his advances? I hope it’s not a long-lost child plot lurking out there for her. Maybe she left behind an sibling in poverty or something instead, back in Cabrini-Green/Chicago. It does seem like neither Tracy nor Sharon’s solo careers turned out the way they dreamed — both ended up singing at City Wineries. I still think Leslie is connected to the Duprees — maybe her mother is Sharon, and she's going after the Duprees because she believes she could’ve had their lifestyle if things had gone differently for her mom. She does have ties to Chicago. That said, I hope this is the last disguise from her toolbox for a while — I’d hate for that to get played out. But I do wonder if she’s going to use Nicole 2.0 to frame Nicole for something down the line? I’m all for giving Shanice more time on canvas, and I wouldn’t hate it if she and Andre became an item — someone who doesn’t mind being public, unlike Dani. Or I can see Doug finally getting fed up with their arrangement and turning to the nurse for some “relief.” Vanessa was, in a way, telling herself off in those scenes with Ted about his cheating. And I have to say, Keith Robinson’s Ted brings a broader range of emotion than Maurice Johnson’s did — though I think Ted 2.0 is benefitting from better writing than OG Ted, whose arc relied more on MJ’s charisma and physical presence. That said, as someone else pointed out, Keith looks like he’s drowning in the clothes they’ve got him in. Hopefully, they’ve got some better-fitted attire lined up now.
    • They are just right there in your face.  It's hard to not see Ciara's boobs at all times.  And simmer down camera man, this is a family show!! The high school stuff makes it weird.  Physically the actors all look fine together.  It just makes me think Doug needs to find friends his own age.   With Ari at least Doug was under the impression she was over 21. I liked JJ and Eve too lol!
    • Specifically that's Kat & she is, there's no other way to say it except like pulling off a band-aid. She's Chad's "#1 fan" IOW, basically, kinda sorta she's an albatross around Chad's neck.  Kat can turn any conversation into a discussion of Chad & what he ate for breakfast or the most minute of minute things about Chad Duell's life & times.  We hope she's not dangerous. We hope she's just boring. That Chad is not back has lit a fire under her. She's upped her number of posts, which all relate in some way to Chad. Now you know what there is to know about as I said Chad Duell's #1 fan.     
    • The Duh-prees - Count me in as someone who cannot stand Kat’s fashion. No one walks around town dressed like that. And those wigs? Completely immovable. We have incredible wig technology these days—can’t the show find something better? - Vernon’s sermons are total FF material. - It looks like they’re setting up a past drinking habit for Anita (with all the “drowning” references), and maybe even a rape/child plot? Also—remember when Dani was an alcoholic? Lol.   Ted / Nicole / Leslie - Some people are projecting way too much onto OG Ted. Sure, he had screen presence, but his line delivery was pure caricature. He wasn’t menacing or threatening—he was a joke. NuTed may be meek, a bit one-note, and smaller in stature, but his confrontation with Leslie on Friday worked. Also, let’s be real—Bill’s not scary either. Total softie. Couldn’t scare a fly. - The ATWT reference was cute, but wasn’t the Duncan storyline from the ‘80s? Are we supposed to believe Nicole was already practicing back then? Since she said it was her patients who watched… like others pointed out, God forbid she watched herself! - Also: I stand corrected on Leslie. I think she’s starting to make more sense as a character. She’s fearless and provocative—that’s what drives her. I actually loved her mirror scene where Nicole 2.0 made her debut.   The non-Dupree characters - You guys were a bit dramatic about Monday’s show. It just had too many unlikeable storylines crammed into one. That’s all. Also, I stand by what I said about Derek and Ashley—their storyline is totally rom-com coded, and I’m into it. - I’ve developed a soft spot for Doug!!

      Please register in order to view this content

      And I thought that Vanessa ripping into Ted had a subtle layer of self-reprimand to it   - I officially can’t stand André. I don’t buy him as a playboy at all. Same goes for Pamela with her transatlantic accent. It’s such a shame that this is the first character CML had to create… and this is what we got?
    • party pics and vids from Don Diamont's wife Cindy Ambuehl https://www.instagram.com/p/DJ9X--uxnF2/
    • You’re really starting to see panic in the other actors’ eyes as they watch him struggle to get through his lines. There is a shot in yesterday’s episode in which  Swickard is standing behind Mo while he drones on and on, and the younger actor is clearly doing everything he can to hide his “WTF” face.
    • Don posted May 12th for 16th anniv of his B&B debut, and Michele Val Jean replied on May 21st: https://www.instagram.com/p/DJknIr8y4ra/

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I just saw this & I liked it. Maybe you will like it too. You do not have to attend every argument you are invited to. It seems to me to be a suitable adage for today's internet.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy