Jump to content

Barack Obama Elected President!


Max

Recommended Posts

  • Members

The press is definitely helping Obama, there is no question about it. Hillary was justified in saying the media is not looking at this objectively. As I said, Obama is running on a movement and the media loves to report something like that. If the media maybe were to report on this a little more objectively, perhaps more people would see what Obama puts forward in inspiration, he more than lacks on true substance and vision. That's just my opinion. I personally think its great he is getting people so energized and this campaign is getting more people energized *(ust look at the numbers coming out to vote in these primaries) but I truly don't think he is ready to be the president of the united states.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

From MSNBC's First Read:

From NBC’s Domenico Montanaro

Per the Toronto Globe and Mail, in a story that was the lead on the paper’s front page today, that call to the Canadian embassy was actually from the Clinton campaign, not Obama’s:

“Mr. [ian] Brodie, [PM Harper’s chief of staff], during the media lockup for the Feb. 26 budget, stopped to chat with several journalists, and was surrounded by a group from CTV. The conversation turned to the pledges to renegotiate the North American free-trade agreement made by the two Democratic contenders, Mr. Obama and New York Senator Hillary Clinton.

“Mr. Brodie, apparently seeking to play down the potential impact on Canada, told the reporters the threat was not serious, and that someone from Ms. Clinton's campaign had even contacted Canadian diplomats to tell them not to worry because the NAFTA threats were mostly political posturing. The Canadian Press cited an unnamed source last night as saying that several people overheard the remark.

“The news agency quoted that source as saying that Mr. Brodie said that someone from Ms. Clinton's campaign called and was ‘telling the embassy to take it with a grain of salt.’

“The story was followed by CTV's Washington bureau chief, Tom Clark, who reported that the Obama campaign, not the Clinton's, had reassured Canadian diplomats.

“Mr. Clark cited unnamed Canadian sources in his initial report. There was no explanation last night for why Mr. Brodie was said to have referred to the Clinton campaign but the news report was about the Obama campaign.”

*** UPDATE *** The Clinton campaign responds: "Unlike the Obama campaign, we can and do flatly deny this report and urge the Canadian government to reveal the name of anyone they think they heard from. The Obama campaign has given a variety of misleading answers to the press and the public about its top economic adviser’s contacts with the Canadian government and should come clean about why they did so," writes campaign spokespman Phil Singer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Florida and Michigan knew they would be stripped of delegates because they held it so early. They didn't change it. If Hilary was ahead, Barrack was no where close to her, I bet it wouldn't be such a problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think they should because these two states are very important in the general election. We may wind up actually taking Florida away from the Republicans and Michigan is considered a swing state. Let's see who both of those states want as the nominee and play it from there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And now Hillary says she does not want a recount and won't accept a caucus.

This is after the truh of NAFTA cmes out, and the only thing her spokesman can do is compair Obama with Ken Starr.

And this is the person I'm supposed to back? She's worrid about answering the phone at 3am?

When she does answer it, whatis she going to say? I know.......

"Bill.......it's for you."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think there should be a revote, because I don't think obama put his name on the ballots of MI and FL because the states broke the rules and their delegates wouldn't count. Its only fair that they should do a re-vote. I don't know why hillary is against this I think she definantly would get FL, but I don't know about MI.

After reading about how much it would cost for the re-vote I don't think the states should do it, that money is better off spent somewhere else in need. An I was mistaken about FL, obama's name was on the ballot so imo that one should count. His name wasn't on the MI ballot so I think they should either leave it alone or give it hillary or shell out 10 million dollars. What I don't understand is if the government knew their voters votes weren't going to count why did they go ahead and hold primaries anyway? Didn't that waste taxpayers money? I can see why hillary doesn't want a re-vote, its a total of 366 delegates combined which would put her most likely in lead if they were counted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't care how much it costs...a re vote is a guarantee that people's voices are heard in these states...either tax payer dollars pay for it or the DNC

As for wasting taxpayer money, EK70, California did that in the recall election. They mailed out ballots that were inaccurate and hence had to issue out new ballots. So it is not foreign for a state to waste tax dollars over an election

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't care how much it costs...a re vote is a guarantee that people's voices are heard in these states...either tax payer dollars pay for it or the DNC

As for wasting taxpayer money, EK70, California did that in the recall election. They mailed out ballots that were inaccurate and hence had to issue out new ballots. So it is not foreign for a state to waste tax dollars over an election

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Now the clinotons are pushing for a clinton/obama ticket, with her as president and obama as vp. I'm not sure they should be pushing this at the moment considering he's beating her by over 100 delegates. I thnk they should of waited to see if she could take the lead and then push the ticket, it would of helped give her more momentum, pushing it now could backfire. An not that the clintons would ever do this :rolleyes::lol: , I think they are saying this now to gurantee that hillary gets VP just in case Obama wins the nom. They are pushing obama in the corner, because even if he does win he is gonna need hillary's supporters and they won't be thrilled if he doesn't pick her as his vp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • When Anita read Barbara's letter, it started out with the viewers hearing it in Barbara's voice as Anita read silently. And then Anita saying the next portion aloud while Barbara's voice continued simultaneously. And then ending with Anita alone saying the last part aloud. Excerpt from interview  (link to full interview) The rest may be spoilerish -- Only the nonspoiler part here: I love the idea of reading that letter,” shares Tunie. “And at one point in the script, I think it said that my voice joined her, and [Anita] started reciting the letter from memory because [she] memorized this letter. I suggested to Steve Williford, our director, ‘What if it’s like that moment in Hamilton when Hamilton is writing the resignation letter to George Washington, and then he starts saying it too, and then Hamilton’s voice fades away, and then it’s all George. What if we do something like that?’ And he was like, ‘Oh, my God! I just got chills. Let’s do it!’ So, we did it.” I understood that it worked really well, so I’m really happy about that.”  
    • I think MVJ and Guza made a good team in the launching of the soap, and I'm hoping that the rotation of all stories and characters is maintained once he officially departs from the credits. And so far, Ron C's breakdowns have been decent... but they pop only when he's paired with a good script writer like Jazmin.   I hope once Guza leaves officially... that MVJ is able to reign in Ron C and the dread Jamey G.
    • I read that, but my interpretation was that she is uncredited because it is in a non-production capacity.  In others words, she's not secretly producing, or writing, as some had speculated prior to the confirmation. Her likeliest position would be in a post-production consultant capacity. I assume we agree on this?
    • Errol already confirmed she is back at Y&R and in a non-producing role; this alludes to she is not credited for the role she has.
    • I don't think Lisa served a purpose after the serial killer storyline. The writers never gave her anything to do but be Vicky's nemesis. Joanna Going deserved better. Another example of a character taking over the show and then the writers not having a longterm plan for the character.  Exhibit B: Sally Spencer. Such a missed opportunity. It really angers me how they misused her. She could sing and act and they just threw her away in that sexist nonsense storyline. Once the story was over, they wrote her off. The McKinnons should have lasted for years. I will give the show credit for how they introduced Sandra Ferguson as Amanda. I thought it was expertly done. She comes in and she immediately connected to RKK's Sam. She has chemistry with Matthew and she has realistic conversations with MAc and Rachel. That's how it is done. 
    • Great points, and it has not completely vanished. Leslie on Beyond the Gates fits the trope (she's still not over that Ted lovin' two decades later), though I will say there does seem to be an effort to make her more complex.
    • I understand why people speculate, but I have to say it doesn’t sound very plausible that Jill Farren Phelps would be working at Y&R in any uncredited role. CBS daytime shows are tightly bound by union contracts and corporate oversight, and that kind of informal arrangement would be a major liability in 2025. Before the mergers of SAG-AFTRA and the two WGA branches, it may have been easier to hire someone quietly or off the books. But those days are behind us. With digital payroll, tighter pension tracking, and increased scrutiny from legal and compliance departments, it’s just not the kind of thing anyone can get away with anymore. Most union members, especially producers nearing retirement, would not risk their eligibility or benefits to take an uncredited role. The Producers Guild of America is also very clear about crediting. To even receive the PGA mark, a producer has to be verified through a formal review process. According to their credit certification guidelines (source), "only individuals who performed a majority of the producing functions on a motion picture or television production" are eligible for credit, and those credits must be official and recorded. If someone is functioning in that capacity, they are not supposed to be uncredited. Studios that are union signatories, like CBS and Sony, know better than to skirt those rules. If anyone has a legitimate, primary source confirming that CBS is hiring someone like Phelps in an uncredited production role, I’d honestly be curious to read it. But without that, this just feels like rumor—not reality.
    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
    • Elements of it were silly, but it was a small price to pay to get Zas back. I should say there's a difference between in town and out of town returns. It's understandable for Roger to skulk around town in a bad wig and clown suit when he's in Springfield and running the risk of bumping in to people he knows.  Taking us out of town to find someone always has a short shelf life. Then it usually becomes about another character knowing X is alive but determined to keep them out of Springfield. Like Alan discovering Amish Reva. I don't know how long it went on, but it was probably twice as long as necessary.
    • Elizabeth Dennehy complained on the Locher Room about how ridiculous so much of the writing was for Roger's return. She laughed at so much of Roger's antics and how it was hard for her to take them seriously. Probably another reason she was fired as she didn't play the game.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy