Jump to content

Barack Obama Elected President!


Max

Recommended Posts

  • Members

The only rules she cares about are the ones that benifit her and the ones she can break. What is amazing is that she signed a letter banning both Mich. and Florida from the convention, and now that she needs their delegates, she fights to get them seated, and gets this arrogance about her that they should be......even though she agreed that they brook the rules!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Now, trip off this.

From CNN:

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Hillary Clinton supporter Harvey Weinstein threatened to cut off contributions to congressional Democrats unless House Speaker Nancy Pelosi embraced his plan to finance revotes in Florida and Michigan, three officials familiar with their conversation said.

Sources say Harvey Weinstein threatened to cut contributions to congressional Democrats.

Weinstein and Pelosi talked on the phone late last month, the sources said.

The three officials spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to talk publicly about the conversation.

They said Weinstein, a top supporter of Clinton's presidential campaign, appeared determined to buy Clinton more time in her battle against Sen. Barack Obama by pushing for the revote. He was also pressing Pelosi to back off her previous comments that superdelegates should support the candidate who's leading in pledged delegates in early June, the sources said.

Weinstein, a co-founder of Miramax Films who now runs the Weinstein Company, called CNN Thursday to vehemently deny that he issued any threats. "Never, ever was the thought about denying funding to Democrats," he said.

Weinstein said the phone call focused on his offer to put together a team of people to help finance a revote in Florida and Michigan. "I told her people felt there would be a disenfranchisement of voters" unless Democrats came up with a remedy, he said. Watch a report on the Pelosi-Weinstein conversation »

Another person familiar with the phone call said what might have upset Pelosi is that Weinstein also suggested that if Democratic leaders "did not fix" the Florida and Michigan problem, powerful Democrats may abandon the eventual party nominee in favor of Sen. John McCain, the presumptive Republican nominee, in November.

But the three officials briefed on the call insisted Weinstein went further by suggesting that if Pelosi did not consider his proposal on the revote, he would help slow the flow of donations to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, which works to elect House Democrats.

"He was trying to get [Pelosi] to promise not to shut the race down," said one of the officials familiar with the call, which came before the primaries in Indiana and North Carolina.

But Pelosi, who has repeatedly insisted she is neutral in the presidential showdown, refused to meet Weinstein's demands.

"She said, 'Don't ever threaten me again,'" said a second official familiar with the heated conversation.

Pelosi spokesman Nadeam Elshami would not characterize the phone call to CNN, saying only: "This was a private conversation, one of many the speaker has about the presidential campaign."

The possibility of a revote in the delegate-rich states of Florida and Michigan is a critical issue because it may be Clinton's last chance to catch up to Obama in the delegate count.

Currently, Obama has 1,845 pledged delegates to Clinton's 1,686.

The tense confrontation between Pelosi and Weinstein is raising private concerns among some Democrats that tensions run so deep that it may be difficult to heal the party's wounds when the primary season is scheduled to end in early June.

Pelosi's decision to refuse to sign on to Weinstein's proposal for revotes in Florida and Michigan -- which were stripped of their delegates by the Democratic National Committee for moving up their primary dates -- is likely to further irk Clinton allies who have charged that the speaker has been tilting her support to Obama.

A superdelegate herself, Pelosi angered the Clinton camp in March by saying that superdelegates should back the candidate who leads in the pledged delegate count by early June.

Clinton allies saw that as favoring Obama, who has been leading in the pledged delegate count. Pelosi has stressed she is only concerned it will be a problem for the Democratic party as a whole if superdelegates are perceived to have overturned the will of the people by backing a candidate who is behind in pledged delegates.

In March, 20 Clinton fundraisers scolded the speaker in a letter for her remarks on the superdelegate issue, hinting they might hold back funds for the DCCC if Pelosi did not allay their concerns. Weinstein was not among the fundraisers who signed the letter.

"We have been strong supporters of the DCCC," the fundraisers wrote to Pelosi. "We therefore urge you to clarify your position on superdelegates and reflect in your comments a more open view to the optional independent actions of each of the delegates at the National Convention in August."

Pelosi did not back down then either, and Democratic party officials hardly seem scared by any of the threats. The DCCC reported more than $44 million in cash-on-hand recently, far outpacing its rival, the National Republican Congressional Committee.

While Weinstein is a prolific fundraiser for favored candidates like Clinton, he has not given much money out of his own pocket to the DCCC. His only contribution to the DCCC was a mere $2,000 in 1993, according to Federal Election Commission records, though he has given tens of thousands of dollars in personal money to Senate Democrats over the last decade. The mogul has also raised tens of millions of dollars for Democratic candidates from other donors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Let me get this straight?

Clintons rich supporters want to pay for revotes?

I wonder who would win? lol

These peeps are really coming off as SLIMEBALLS!

I'm glad that the speaker isn't backing down!

She's 1 tough cookie!

If Obama had lost both races but a pretty good margine Bigshots Dems would eb all over him to quit.

Yet they're treating Clinton with kid gloves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

These tactics really irritate me. I am starting to like Nancy Pelosi more every day. The Clintons are just bullies and think they are entitled to the nomination and to the support of all public officials whether they actually win the primary or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You know I really liked Bill Clinton as president. I thought he did a very very good job. I always thought he was without prejudice and I believe his presidency made a difference. I always like Hillary too. She has been such an icon for women. When I went to vote in the Democratic Primary, I honestly did not make up my mind until I was standing over the ballot. I voted for Obama because he is an optimist and really seems to want to do what is right for everybody. I also like that he seems so calm. I don't think he will be given to emotional decisions. Now, because of this campaign, I have a really bad taste in my mouth about the Clintons. I don't mind so much that she is not throwing in the towel. I think that is more wishful thinking on her part than anything. Anybody who has been associated with a campaign knows that you just don't accept that they are going to lose. What bother me is that it just seems she will violate any rule or do anything to win, even if it means cheating or hurting the party. Her supporters saying that they will toss Congress to the R's if they don't do what Hillary wants? That makes us as bad as the Republicans. I want Hillary to express outrage over that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Good Luck with that.

She's using the media today to try and make him into the "bad guy" who is disenfranchising the voters in FL and MI.

Your commitment to the voters of these states must be clearly stated and your support for a fair and quick resolution must be clearly demonstrated.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/...a-on-delegates/

Some of the comments below the article are hilarious but there's one that really had me laughing.

When she opens her mouth now I swear all I can hear is "Give me the White House. It's mine. It's mine."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Is Obama still in this thing?

Hilary Clinton is now saying that WV is must win for Democrats in order to win the WH. Shockingly enough she's expected to win WV. Now not only is she the real leader of the white voters but she's apparently got an even greater range:

Amid questions of whether she can still win the nomination, Clinton argued that she is beating Obama with the groups of people McCain will be targeting in the Fall – Catholics, Hispanics, blue-collar workers and senior citizens. Clinton also called McCain a "formidable" opponent.

Why did she leave out the Protestants and the Jews, the young, the middle aged, Ronald McDonald, Jack in the Box, the Pillsbury Dough boy? She gets worse by the minute.

I forgot to include the link:

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/...-for-democrats/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh, and just so we can end this Bulls**t about NC's racial make-up......you know, that the reason why Obama won the state was because all the black people voted:

In 2007, the U.S. Census estimated that the racial makeup of North Carolina was as follows: 70% White American, 22.3% African-American, 1.2% American Indian, and the remaining 6.5% are Hispanic or Latino (of any race).

Damn..........he must have performed the Vulcan Mind Meld on those 6 white people who voted for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • -- Weirdest red carpet ever at the Nurses' Ball. Every conversation was filled with snark and shade or outright insults, and we even got an on-camera arrest of Tracy -- while Congressman Drew (who's never in DC) stood there. I guess it was more interesting than the usual. -- Why did Gio walk the carpet with Joss? -- Sonny is usually escaping mobsters who want to kill him. So of course he accompanies his granddaughter on the carpet. On camera.
    • I agree with all of this.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

    • I'm not Jason but O'Connor was not listed in Monday's episode with the BDWs.
    • As much as I love the Nurses Ball, the campiness of it all always comes off as strange and a little cringey, because GH isn't often like that. But whatevs, I'm looking forward to seeing what happens. The surprise with Kai was kinda sweet. I wish they had spent more time on that, and given us more of Trina's POV, instead of rushing through it and talking more about his surgery.  But yeah, poor Gio. He really should've escorted Emma instead of Joss

      Please register in order to view this content

       I'm looking forward to seeing him perform though  And, poor Tracy too. She will never be the bad guy in this whole situation with Sonny, Drew, etc., no matter how Chris and Elizabeth (or Frank) choose to write it. Btw, since this is the Nurses Ball, where the hell is Nurse Liz? 
    • @JAS0N47 was O'Connor listed in Monday's episode with the BDWs
    • Considering that a soap opera hasn't been launched in over 25 years, I think the show is doing well. In 2025, you're not going to get a soap opera on the level of soaps you watched before the 1990s for a variety of reasons. - All scenes are filmed out of order.  No longer do shows do the live to tape process. - No longer are there rehearsals before filming the episodes. - Most of the greats retired/passed away without teaching a lot of the new generation how to produce or write a soap opera in the pre 2000 way. Also, this isn't filmed where soap operas were filmed so the show is using local talent that is hitting it out of the park.  It reminds me of the CBN soap Another life that used local talent in the Virginia beach area. Lastly, soaps take several months to get going.. and I think the show is in good shape after 56 episodes (at least compared to other soaps that started in the late 80s and 90s like Generations, SunSet Beach, Passions, etc)
    • Cool, thank you for the perspective - helps me appreciate the story more. Totally makes sense - we know BB was so frustrated with the state of the show after its first 6 months that he was ready to cancel it.
    • I couldn't agree more. It's all subjective.
    • It should be better for a show airing in 2025. But that's just my take.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy