Jump to content

Barack Obama Elected President!


Max

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I am sure people would understand why SDs would go for Hillary if she is more formidable and why the SDs feel she should be at the top of the ticket and still vote....especially if she puts him on as VP. Remember that a lot of Obama supporters will go for McCain if he is not on the ticket. I think they need each other...they admire each other, like each other as friends, and odds are have a deal worked out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Some don't see it that way.

They would rather ruin the party and give Hillary what she wants instead of thinking about the big picture.

If she wouldn't have ran a bad campaign, and wouldn't have been so arrogant, and would be leading in all the categories, who could argue with giving her the nom?

But she's not. She's behind and her campaign is broke. And the peson leading shouldn't get the nom? I mean, where is the logic in that? That would mean that no matter how the people voted in each state, it wouldn't matter, because the few in the back room would make the decision. How is that being a party of the people?

I just want to know does every vote count.......or do only the votes count if your candidate is winning?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No problem with it at all. But when posters start heckling someone else for adoring Hilary...well it bugs the hell out of me. Seriously, so what if Hilary is losing...do you have to GLOAT over it every post ....DO YOU??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And Roman I wouldnt Gloat too much. There are reports Obama is in trouble if he cant get the right people to vote for him against McCain. So McCain might reign on your party.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It sounds like your argument changes depending on what is going on.

Let me put it this way.

You and a co-worker are up for a job. You both have 30 days to prove who is better, and whoever has the betternumbers gets the position. So, you come in on time, do your job and get the better numbers. Your co-worker comes in late every single day, slacks off and comes in second.

But your other co-workers take a poll, and since they judge that he could be a better supervisor than you, he/she gets the position.

Now, by your logic......that is fair, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I watched every Daytime Emmy broadcast from 1985-2011 and 2020 onward and the best years were 1985-1999.
    • Thank you for your input.
    • I'm that person and I own it.  I just find that look so performative. She comes across as playing dress ups. Will anyone back me up? ....anyone??
    • I didn't even bother.  And to trot out Lauren and Michael who are hardly on and don't have stories... It must be a money saving situation.
    • I recall a scene between Phillip and Chelsea that was played with Bolger--I think it was the characters' first major conversation--but soon after that Grant returned.  Chelsea working in PR at Spaulding made little sense. At least Blake was supposed to be qualified. Never understood why Alan was willing to give Chelsea that job. He seemed to really like Chelsea as Phillip's girlfriend, too, which made less sense, as she was even lower on the social scale than Beth. Wait... Just thought of something. Took her storyline?  Was CHELSEA originally supposed to be Alan's spy to help him get Spaulding back? Were they going to become lovers? Is THAT what Maureen meant about her being "wild?" Yikes.
    • The ball had a certain and-now-for-something-different charm back in the day, but yeah, it's just too polished, too much of an "institution."
    • Good catch. More Bell parallels. ICAM! With both statements. Same. It doesn't seem like they even enjoy writing for her. They may need to change her career to move her around.  I hope it's only for flashback scenes. Not every character needs a family member, especially the villains. That's how I felt, too. It ruined the coming out moment for me. I still liked the moment, but it was more like a plot device instead a more natural time.
    • My god Kristina was in full delusion today. I know she was never the best character but I don’t remember ever hating the character the way I do now and have since the baby nonsense.
    • To me that's always what they have been. I figured that was part of the charm to people who enjoy them. They could have just had the legendary Rosalind Cash onstage but instead they have Lucky and Luke (and Justus) in the background to give us some heartwarming comedy as the Pips. I think the Nurses' Ball should just have been left to those first few years, to be honest (any time before we got year after year of Ned "rocking out" and the year of a sex tape being played), but I do know many people love them. My main issue is they often just seem a little too glossy since coming back thanks to the HD format. I was watching the Spinelli performance on Youtube and it is clearly meant to be charming, silly fun, which it is, but it's more suited to the cheap seats era of the Ball where you had someone literally hanging from the rafters, not today's slickness.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy