Jump to content

GL/ATWT: First look at new Springfield/Oakdale


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I haven't watched ATWT yet, but at the end of GL today they showed a preview of what the new Springfield will look like. We got to see the entire city on location, including cemetaries, Dinah in a car, houses and even the legendary lighthouse. I must give them proips, it actually looked good! The premiere date given was February 28th or 29th, I'm not 100% on that.

For those who watched ATWT, did they show something similar? I might start tuning back in to GL now that it doesn't look like a high school play. And to think people say PGP wants to kill their soaps! They're the only ones innovating. Yeah right now they have awful HWs, but that's more the fault of the EPs since they no longer have someone running their daytiem soaps (like MADD).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 35
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

They did not air anything like that for ATWT :( I hope they do soon!

I agree that it looked terrific! I'm really curious about the "permanent" sets they are creating too.

And I am also sick of hearing that P&G is trying to kill their soaps. At least they are doing something to try to save them. I also think this could be a very positive change in the look in addition to saving money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It still looked like footage shot with a pocket digital camera, if you ask me. The wide shots seem really far away, as if to desperately prove that they're really outside. The long shot leading to the lighthouse would be nice for the opening montage. We shall see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, I don't blame anyone who watched ATWT's "experiments" with the digital handheld cameras this fall for thinking this would be horrible. BUT, I admit, that GL promo looks fabulous. If they can deliver half of what the promo looks like, it will be successful. I still don't understand how it's going to cut costs with the added complication of being "on location", and being subjected to the whims of the weather, but whatever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

FYI, Rosebud has also posted about Days -- the thing is the posts are dead on about Corday being an idiot. :)

Back to the topic... ATWT has not done anything yet to promote the new look, but I absolutely LOVE GL's look. I didn't know what to expect, but it looks very realistic. They'll be able to use NY streets for some location footage and that town in New Jersey (I forget its name) for other work.

Looks like the lighthouse will have a prominent role, too, and that should make traditionalists like me happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I managed to track down a clip of the promo, and while it looks good all pieced together like that, I cant see how well it'll translate on screen when they're jumping between outside shots and the new 'four walled' sets they promised...if they're as bad as the current sets it will be too jarring a contrast unless they do it right. I can't see the having EVERYTHING taking place outdoors and I really can't see them building permanent sets that feature as homes for characters (unless everyone lives in identical houses with just different furniture etc, which wouldn't be any better than everyone living in The Beacon), so I don't know how it will all pan out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's not a single post.... it's a recurring thing on the mediadomain.com board. Someone will post, ''I hate this storyline'' and Rosebud2 will reply, ''This is not new. This has been going on for the past 10-15 years. P&G no longer wants to be in the soap opera business and is intentionally sabotaging the show. blahblahblah''

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I hate all this conspiracy theory talk. The truth of the matter is that if P&G no longer wanted to be in the soap opera business they wouldn't be spending money on trying to rejuvenate their soaps; they would just let them continually churn out the same old drivel. Maybe, in ATWT's case, they want rid because it costs too much (due to having a larger cast than GL and larger amount of vets), but it seems P&G are really behind GL and it's recent Emmy win has bought it some time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The rejuvenation at P&G isn't due to spending more money than they did before. Actors have taken pay cuts or voluntarily jumped ship. TPTB are churning out the same old drivel as I type this reply! Of course networks don't want to be in the soap business with the ratings they're getting, but the they have no programming formula in place to replace the shows with. Diane Sawyer painting her nails for 3 hours isn't a hot proposition just yet. Imagine the viewer revolt if soaps were all yanked off the air with no hope of renewal. It's a lot safer to pretend bad ratings are the result of abandonment than the horrific writing and daytime's practically incestuous insistence on hiring the same hacks over and over again. How do you rejuvenate anything while Wheeler, Goutman, Kreizman and Passanante are still employed? :rolleyes:

A face lift fools nobody when you're obviously old as hell. B)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • My comment has nothing to do with cast resentment, but does relate to the Finland location shoot: It may be a coincidence, but Jim Matthews died in Finland in 1982.  Hugh Marlowe's final episode was in April 1982, but the character probably didn't die untll May or June. (I'm unable to find the character's date of death, only the date of Marlowe's final episode). SInce Jim and Rachel had very little interaction after around 1975, it is unlikely Jim's death in Finland had any connection to Rachel's potential visit, but the choice to have Jim die in that location at that time is a head-scratcher. 
    • I totally understand your sloths concern about it and I agree with you. Let’s hope the show plays it’s cards right.    Further comments about the last few episodes: - I liked that one of the attendees was filming the scene. That’s realistic. I wonder if the writers will follow up with that.  - Martin and Smitty trying to drag Leslie out was very heteronormative, so perfectly in line with them two as characters lol.    As for the future: it’s obvious the Duprees will come to accept Eva one way or another, but the rivalry with Kay should be here for the long term   On the topic of acting: the only bad actors I’m seeing are Ted and Derek. Tomas hasn’t proven to be either good or bad, so far, but he’s certainly mediocre and uncharismatic. He sucks the energy out of the scenes and I don’t see any couple of women ever vying for him. 
    • I’m trying to think which actors VW were working with at the time, and none of them had been there for a while. Even like Mac and Ada didn’t have that big of a part in Rachel’s storyline.  And Jamie was involved with all that movie stuff.
    • Brooke did ads before ATWT too. That probably helped get her the job. After ATWT she seemed to branch more into hosting, along with ads.  I think I saw Kelley in an ad or two, but you're right she wasn't on as much. 
    •   Thanks for sharing these. I wonder if Charles might have been in the running for Adam. I know Preacher was a bit of a bad boy at times on EON, but Neal seemed to be a step down, and Robert Lupone had played a similar part on AMC. Given the huge cast turnover at this point I wonder who thought they had been there long enough to go.  Laura Malone/Chris Rich would get a remote within the next year. 
    • Interesting.  It seems to allude to that statement that Warren Burton made around that time about some AW actors getting special treatment.  I wonder who was resentful about not getting to go. 
    • Good morning, boys!  I figured that it was time that our Gio was introduced into the hotness thread

      Please register in order to view this content

      @ranger1rg I even included a close up of his face for ya!
    • Under all of Madonna's social media today there is this wave of negative, toxic, absurd comments by Lady Gaga fans telling her how Gaga surpassed her in concert in Copacabana. I mean... Who the hell cares? Why are these fan communities so freaking toxic??? I'm sure Madonna doesn't care... But still. Have some respect for M. Leave her social media alone. Go cheer Gaga and be happy. Why come and spew hate on M??? Crazy world.
    • FYI, again, Ruth/Letitia is not in either of these 2 episodes. So that concludes the 4 episodes I had from Nov. 1983. I don't have the October episodes.
    • Eddie has begun uploading the 1990 episodes. I'm so happy about that. I was mindfully taking a break till there's plenty of episodes I can binge watch when I feel like it. Now that 1989 is complete... I can't wait to press play on February 1989 and resume where I left off.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy