Jump to content

2008: The Directors and Writers Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 4.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

If you set your expectations too high you're guaranteed to be disappointed. For me, I take the soaps one day at a time. I refuse to get excited about anything until there's consistent growth and progress on a specific show. Once that happens, I can begin to get excited about things again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I see, for now, as much as I'd love scriptwriters and breakdown writers with better reputations, if the storylines suck, there's no need for me to watch a soap. If the dialogue and structure are average, that's fine, but there has to be something about the storylines that will keep me watching.

I seriously doubt most of these people will last at Y&R for very long. Y&R seems to be like how the other soaps were a few years ago, you know constant hirings and firings. While the other soaps are trying to be cheap and keep all writers they have now, instead of firing them and hiring new writers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh, just that they're more experienced script writers with an appreciation for character and the distinction between voices. So if they're given a more "general" outline to work from, they have lots of room to really add a lot to the episode, as opposed to an inexperienced script writer who won't know what to do with that kind of outline, and ends up writing in flashbacks and awkward "hip" moments like R Sinclair was referring to.

I always hear stories, and interviews with soap writers who have referenced this, about Santa Barbara's glory days, and that the outlines were atrocious, but the script writing team was so strong, they really got to fill in the blanks of the horrible breakdowns with all of those wonderful Capwell dinner conversations, the Mason/Julia cerebral bantering, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

All he does it write dialogue for B&B.

I know he wrote outlines in addition to scripts at SB, GL, and GH.

Since B&B is only a half hour show and doesn't use traditional outlines, all Mulcahey does is write scripts.

B&B will never win an Emmy for writing, but that's another story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Because, look at what he has to work with (says the Patrick Mulcahey apologist, lol). Put aside the fact that, for the most part, B&B's cast is one of the weaker ones right now. As unfocused as SANTA BARBARA could be sometimes, the show still possessed amazing, multi-layered characters, like Mason, Julia, Gina, Keith, CC and Sophia, Lionel and Augusta, and so forth. With the exceptions of Stephanie and Pam, B&B's characters are bland and insipid by comparison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Has anyone ever totted up how many women on GL slept with both father and son(s)? Reva gets a lot of crap for it but she's far from the only one: Claire Beth Blake Olivia Dina Did I miss anyone?  
    • I think Long was probably planning to have Claire suffer from Post Partum, but she left the writing staff shortly after Claire had Michelle so that element didn't get explored. And I always assumed that when Claire returned in the late 90s/early 00s.. that she was realizing that she messed up by not staying a part of Michelle's life and became resentful/bitter over her previous choices.  That was my theory.  
    • Jenn was a huge part of the success of Days back in the day, and that contribution shouldn't be dismissed.  With that said, I do think her and Jack's time on the show should remain as occasional visits/drop ins. When Missy returns to play Jenn, Jenn is back to being Jenn.   Jenn in her glory days was head strong, fiesty, and was a live wire.... and her scenes with Jack on Friday was classic Jenn with Jack being the voice of reason.   It was the foundation of their relationship back in the day.    
    • Claire was always tightly wound, I think what Long was going to do is to throw the three into this impossible situation with no bad guys, Mo, knowing how to take care of kids from growing up but unable to conceive and Claire, who didnt know how to take care of kids and was totally focused on her career, gets knocked up.  Ryder took Claire off the deep end as a convenient way to make story for characters he wasnt interested in (though Pratt blames McTavish) with little effort. It was later explained to be a brain tumor (though why was she a bitch again when she returned?) \ Claire did sleep with Rick, she was his first!
    • I'm sorry, truly I am, but this literally made me LOL. Tempting fate, much?

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Oh, I have very little doubt that Missy feels some way personally and privately.  Donna was just saying she actively spoke out against Days in public in reference to the gay storylines, which she did not. I don't have super strong feeling about Jen one way or another.  She was always a side character to me.  I still think Missy is Jen regardless of her stupid beliefs.
    • I hated the swap-over; Clayton Norcross, to me, was far superior in the role of Thorne than Jeff Trachta ever was. And the recast left me disliking Thorne when he was the superior son to me. As for Teri Ann Linn, I feel like she got the raw deal. Kristen was very clear as a forefronting character, especially in her rivalry with Stephanie, and it feels like she was dropped off for Felicia, and they never returned it. Not to mention the subpar recast with Tracy Melchior in 2001. Someone like Brenda Epperson (ex-Ashley, Y&R) would've been more suited for that role.
    • I just remember when Leo was marrying Craig (?), Greg Rikaart stated a line and made direct eye-contact with Melissa Reeves, and when the camera cut to her, she looked away. 

      Please register in order to view this content

       Rikaart had a mission that day, and he succeeded.
    • I need to go and find less.
    • Scroll to page 2 and there it is.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy